On the Holy Spirit (in Jerome's Latin translation)
The whole work on one page. Select a passage number to open that passage with its notes, Scripture references, and citation.
On the Holy Spirit 0
0PL 23
Cum in Babylone [scil. Romae] versarer: et purpuratae meretricis essem colonus, et jure Quiritum viverem, volui garrire aliquid de Spiritu sancto, et coeptum opusculum, ejusdem urbis pontifici dedicare. Et ecce olla illa, quae in Jeremia post baculum cernitur a facie aquilonis coepit ardere: et Pharisaeorum conclamavit [al. conclamare ] Senatus et nullus scriba vel fictus, sed omnis quasi indicio sibi praelio doctrinarum, adversum me imperitiae factio conjuravit. Illico ego, vehit postliminio, Jerosolymam sum reversus: et post Romuli casam, et ludorum Lupercalia, diversorium Mariae, et Salvatoris speluncam aspexi. Itaque, mi Pauliniane [al. Pauline], frater, quia supradictus Pontifex Damasus, qui me ad hoc opus primus impu lerat, jam dormit [al. obdormivit in Domino] in Christo: tam tuo quam venerabilium mihi, aucillarum Christi, Paulae et Eustochii nunc adjutus oratu [al. hortatu]: canticum quod cantare non potui in terra aliena, hic a vobis in Judaea provocatus immurmuro; augustiorem multo locum existimans, qui Salvatorem mundi, quam qui fratris genuit parricidam · Et ut auctorem titulo fatear: malui alieni operis interpres exsistere, quam (ut quidam faciunt) informis cornicula, alienis me coloribus adornare. Legi dudum cujusdam libellos de Spiritu sancto: et juxta Comici [scil. Terentii] sententiam ex Graecis bonis, Latina vidi non bona. Nihil ibi dialecticum, nihil virile atque districtum, quod lectorem vel ingratis in assensum trahat: sed totum flaccidum, molle, nitidum, atque formosum, et ex quisitis hinc inde odoribus pigmentatum. Didymus vero meus, oculum habens sponsae de Cantico canticorum, et illa lumina quae in candentes segetes sublimari Jesus praecepit, procul altius intuetur: et antiquum nobis morem reddidit; ut Videns vocetur propheta. Certe qui hunc legerit, Latinorum furta cognoscet; et contemnet rivulos, cum coeperit haurire de fontibus. Imperitus sermone est, et [al. sed] non scientia: apostolicum virum ex ipso sermone [al. stylo] exprimens, tam sensuum lumine quam simplicitate verborum.
When I was living in Babylon [that is, Rome], a tenant of the woman of easy virtue clothed in purple, and lived under the law of the Quirites, I wanted to babble something about the Holy Spirit and to dedicate the little work I had begun to the bishop of that same city. And behold, that pot which in Jeremiah is seen after the rod, from the face of the north, began to boil; and the senate of the Pharisees cried out together, and not a single scribe, not even a counterfeit one, but the whole faction of ignorance conspired against me, as if a battle of doctrines had been proclaimed against it. At once I returned to Jerusalem, as if by the right of return from captivity; and after the hut of Romulus and the games of the Lupercalia I looked upon the lodging of Mary and the cave of the Saviour. So, my brother Paulinian, since the bishop Damasus mentioned above, who first urged me to this work, now sleeps in Christ, I am now helped by your prayers as well as by those of Paula and Eustochium, handmaids of Christ whom I revere; and the song which I could not sing in a foreign land I now murmur here in Judaea, called forth by you, thinking this place far more august, which gave birth to the Saviour of the world, than that which gave birth to the murderer of his brother. And to confess the author in the title: I preferred to be the translator of another man's work rather than, as some do, a shapeless little crow decking myself out in another's colours. Some time ago I read a certain man's little books on the Holy Spirit, and, as the Comic poet says, I saw Latin that was not good made out of good Greek. Nothing there was argued with logic, nothing manly and taut that would draw the reader to assent even against his will: everything was flabby, soft, glossy and pretty, painted with perfumes gathered from here and there. But my Didymus, who has the eye of the bride in the Song of Songs and those lights which Jesus commanded to be lifted up to the white fields, looks far higher, and has restored to us the ancient custom by which a prophet is called a Seer. Certainly whoever reads him will recognize the thefts of the Latins and will despise the little streams once he begins to drink from the springs. He is unskilled in speech but not in knowledge, expressing the apostolic man by his very speech, as much by the light of his thought as by the simplicity of his words.
Chapter 1
1PL 23
Omnibus quidem quae divina sunt, cum reverentia et vehementi eura oportet intendere: maxime autem his quae de Spiritus[al. sancti Spiritus] divinitate dicuntur, praesertim cum blasphemia in eum sine venia sit: ita ut blasphemantis poena tendatur non solum in omne praesens saeculum, sed etiam in futurum. Ait quippe Salvator, blasphemanti in Spiritum sanctum non esse remissionem, « neque in isto saeculo, neque in futuro. » Unde magis ac magis oportet intendere, quae Scripturarum de eo relatio sit: ne in aliquem saltem per ignorantiam blasphemiae error obrepat. Expedierat quidem fideli, et timido, moderanti vires suas, magnitudinem praesentis quaestionis silentio praeterire: et rem plenam periculo non in suum discrimen attrahere. Verum quoniam quidam [al. quidam cum] temeritate potius, quam recta via etiam in superna eriguntur, et haec de Spiritu sancto jactitant, quae neque in Scripturis lecta, neque a quoquam ecclesiasticorum veterum usurpata sunt, compulsi sumus creberrimae exhortationi fratrum cedere: quaeque sit nostra de eo opinio, etiam Scripturarum testimoniis comprobare: ne imperitia tanti dogmatis, hi qui contraria opponunt, decipiant eos qui, sine discussione sollicita, in adversariorum sententiam statim pertrahuntur.
All divine matters ought to be attended to with reverence and great care, but above all what is said of the divinity of the Spirit, especially since blasphemy against him is without pardon, so that the punishment of the blasphemer extends not only through the whole present age but into the age to come. For the Saviour says that for one who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit there is no forgiveness, "neither in this age nor in the age to come." So all the more must we attend to what account the Scriptures give of him, so that the error of blasphemy may not creep up on anyone, even through ignorance. It would have been better for a faithful and fearful man, who measures his strength, to pass over the greatness of the present question in silence and not draw a matter full of danger into his own peril. But since some, by rashness rather than by the right way, raise themselves even to heavenly things and boast things about the Holy Spirit that are neither read in the Scriptures nor used by any of the ancient churchmen, we have been compelled to yield to the very frequent urging of the brothers, and to prove by the testimonies of the Scriptures what our view of him is, so that those who set forth contrary views may not, through ignorance of so great a doctrine, deceive those who without careful examination are at once drawn over to the opponents' opinion.
Chapter 2
2PL 23
Appellatio Spiritus sancti, et ea quae monstratur ex ipsa appellatione substantia penitus ab his ignoratur qui extra sacram Scripturam philosophantur. Solummodo enim in nostratibus Litteris; et notio ejus et vocabulum refertur, tam in Novis quam in Veteribus. Veteris quippe Testamenti homo David, particeps ejus effectus, orabat ut in se permaneret, dicens: « Spiritum tuum sanctum ne auferas a me. » Et Danieli adhuc puero suscitasse dicitur Deus Spiritum sanctum quasi jam habitantem in eo. Nec non etiam in Novo Testamento hi viri qui Deo placuisse referuntur, Spiritu sancto pleni sunt. Joannes quippe adhuc in matris utero sanctificatus exsultat, et Jesus a mortuis resurgens, cum insufflasset in faciem discipulorum, ait: « Accipite Spiritum sanctum. » Plena sunt volumina divinarum Scripturarum his sermonibus quorum con geriem in praesenti opere digerere supersedi: quia difficile non est ex his quae assumpsimus, unumquemque lectorem sibi similia reperire.
The name "Holy Spirit", and the substance that the name itself points to, are wholly unknown to those who philosophize outside sacred Scripture. For both the notion of him and the term are found only in our own writings, in the New as well as the Old. David, a man of the Old Testament, who had become a sharer in him, prayed that he might remain in him, saying: "Do not take your Holy Spirit from me." And God is said to have stirred up the Holy Spirit in Daniel while he was still a boy, as one already dwelling in him. In the New Testament too, those men who are reported to have pleased God are full of the Holy Spirit. John, sanctified while still in his mother's womb, leaps for joy; and Jesus, rising from the dead, breathed into the face of the disciples and said: "Receive the Holy Spirit." The volumes of the divine Scriptures are full of such sayings; I have refrained from collecting the whole mass of them in this work, since it is not hard for any reader to find similar ones for himself from those we have cited.
Chapter 3
3PL 23
Nemo autem suspicetur alium Spiritum sanctum fuisse in sanctis viris ante adventum Domini, et alium in apostolis caeterisque discipulis, et quasi homonymum in differentibus esse substantiis. Possumus quidem testimonia de divinis Litteris exhibere, quia idem Spiritus et in apostolis et in prophetis fuerit. Paulus in Epistola quam ad Hebraeos scribit, de Psalmorum volumine testimonium proferens, a Spiritu sancto id dictum esse commemorat: « Et sicut dicit hic Spiritus sanctus: Hodie si vocem ejus audieritis, nolite obdurare corda vestra, » etc. In fine quoque Actuum apostolorum, cum Judaeis disputans, ait: « Sicut Spiritus sanctus locutus est per Isaiam prophetam ad patres nostros, dicens: Auditionem audietis, et non intelligetis. » Neque enim Paulus alium habens Spiritum sanctum, haec de eo scripsit, qui in prophetis ante adventum Domini alius fuit; sed de eo cujus et ipse particeps fuit; et omnes qui in fide consummatae virtutis ferebantur. Unde et cum articulo ejus meminit, quasi solitarium et unum esse contestans. ubi dicit non simpliciter, Πνεύμα άγιον, hoc est « Spiritus sanctus, » sed cum additamento articuli τδ Πνεύμα τδ άγιον; hoc est « hic Spiritus sanctus. » Et Isalam prophetasse commemorat cum arti culata voce, διά τδ Πνεύμα τδ άγιον. id est « per hunc Spiritum sanctum, » et non simpliciter Πνεύμα άγιον. Petrus quoque in eo sermone, quo praesentibus persuadebat: « Oportuerat [al. Oportet], inquit, impleri Scripturam, quam locutus est Spiritus sanctus (id est, τδ Πνεύμα τδ άγιον) per os David de Juda: » ostendens et ipse eumdem Spiritum, et in prophetis, et in apostolis operatum.
Let no one suppose that there was one Holy Spirit in the holy men before the coming of the Lord and another in the apostles and the other disciples, as if a single name stood for different substances. We can produce testimonies from the divine writings that the same Spirit was in the apostles and in the prophets. Paul, in the epistle he writes to the Hebrews, citing a testimony from the book of Psalms, records that it was spoken by the Holy Spirit: "And as this Holy Spirit says: Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts," and so on. At the end of the Acts of the Apostles also, disputing with the Jews, he says: "As the Holy Spirit spoke through Isaiah the prophet to our fathers, saying: You will hear with your ears and not understand." Paul did not write this as one who had a different Holy Spirit, about one who was a different Spirit in the prophets before the Lord's coming, but about the one of whom he himself was a sharer, and all who were borne along in the faith of perfected virtue. That is why he mentions him with the article, as if testifying that he is unique and one: he does not say simply Πνεῦμα ἅγιον, that is, "Holy Spirit", but with the addition of the article, τὸ Πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον, that is, "this Holy Spirit". And he records that Isaiah prophesied using the articled expression διὰ τοῦ Πνεύματος τοῦ ἁγίου, that is, "through this Holy Spirit", and not simply Πνεῦμα ἅγιον. Peter too, in the speech in which he was persuading those present, says: "The Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit (that is, τὸ Πνεῦμα τὸ ἅγιον) spoke through the mouth of David concerning Judas," showing that the same Spirit worked both in the prophets and in the apostles.
Chapter 4
4PL 23
Plenius de hoc in consequentibus tractabimus, cum dicere coeperimus, non solum Dominum [al. Deum] Verbum factum esse ad prophetas sed et Spiritum sanctum; quia et inseparabiliter possidetur, cum unigenito Filio Dei. Ipsa vox [al. Ipsa igitur voxj Spiritus sancti, non est vacua appellatio, sed subjacentis essentiae demonstratrix: Patri Filioque socia [al. sociata], et a creaturis penitus aliena. Cum enim creaturae in visibilia, et in invisibilia, id est in corporalia et in incorporalia partiantur, nec de corporalibus substantiis est Spiritus sanctus, animae et sensus habitator, sermonis et sapientiae, et scientiae effector: nec de invisibilibus creaturis. Haec quippe omnia sapientiae et caeterarum virtutum. et sanctificationis capacia sunt. Ista vero substantia, dc qua nunc sermo est, sapientiae et scientiae, et sanctificationis effectrix est. Neque enim inveniri potest aliqua in Spiritu sancto fortitudo, aut operatio sanctificationis virtutisque, quam ab extraneo quodam sustineat: quia istiusmodi natura mutabilis est. Porro Spiritus sanctus, confessione omnium, immutabilis est, sanctificator scientiae divinae, et universorum attributor bonorum, et, ut brevius dicam, ipse subsistens in his bonis quae a Domino largiuntur. Nam eumdem Evangelii locum Matthaeus Lucasque describens, alter ex his ait: « Quanto magis Pater coelestis dabit bona petentibus se? » Alter vero: « Quanto magis Pater vester coelestis dabit Spiritum suum sanctum petentibus se? » Ex quibus apparet, Spiritum sanctum plenitudinem esse donorum [al. bonorum] Dei; et ea quae divinitus administrantur, non absque eo subsistere; quia omnes utilitates quae ex donorum Dei gratia suscipiuntur, ex isto fonte dimanant. Quod autem substantialiter bonum est, non potest extraneae capax esse bonitatis, cum ipsum tribuat caeteris bonitatem. Igitur manifestum est, non a corporalibus tantum, sed et ab incorporalibus creaturis extraneum esse Spiritum sanctum; quia exterae substantiae hanc substantiam sanctificationis accipiunt; iste vero non tantum non est capax sanctificationis alienae, sed insuper attributor est et creator. Denique qui communione ejus fruumtur, participes dicuntur Spiritus sancti, sanctificati utique ab co. Perspicue enim scriptum est, « Et Spiritui gratiae contumeliam faciens, » haud dubium quin is qui post susceptionem ejus peccaverit. Si autem sanctificatus est per communionem Spiritus sancti, ostenditur quod ipse particeps ejus fuerit, et largitor ejus sanctificationis Spiritus sanctus. Apostolus quoque ad Corinthios scribens, et enumerans eos qui regnum coelorum sunt consecuturi, addit dicens: « Et haec quidem fuistis; sed abluti estis, sed sanctificati estis, sed justificati estis, in nomine Jesu Christi et in Spiritu Dei nostri: » Spiritum Dei, non alium asserens esse quam Spiritum sanctum. Etenim in consequentibus idem approbat, dicens: « Nemo in Spiritu Dei loquens, dicit anathema Jesu: et nemo dicit Dominum Jesum, nisi in Spiritu sancto, » Spiritum Dei, Spiritum sanctum esse confirmans.
We shall treat this more fully in what follows, when we begin to show that not only did the Word of the Lord come to the prophets but also the Holy Spirit, because he too is possessed inseparably with the only-begotten Son of God. The very name "Holy Spirit" is not an empty title but points to an underlying essence, partner of the Father and the Son and wholly foreign to creatures. For since creatures are divided into visible and invisible, that is, corporeal and incorporeal, the Holy Spirit, who dwells in the soul and the mind and produces speech, wisdom and knowledge, is not of the corporeal substances; nor is he of the invisible creatures. For all these are capable of receiving wisdom and the other virtues and sanctification; but this substance of which we now speak produces wisdom and knowledge and sanctification. Nor can any strength be found in the Holy Spirit, or any working of sanctification and virtue, that he holds from something outside himself, since a nature of that kind is changeable. But the Holy Spirit, by the confession of all, is unchangeable, the sanctifier in divine knowledge and the giver of all good things; and, to put it briefly, he himself subsists in the good things that are bestowed by the Lord. For Matthew and Luke, describing the same passage of the Gospel, one of them says: "How much more will the heavenly Father give good things to those who ask him?" and the other: "How much more will your heavenly Father give his Holy Spirit to those who ask him?" From this it appears that the Holy Spirit is the fullness of God's gifts, and that what is given by God does not subsist without him, since all the benefits received from the grace of God's gifts flow from this spring. What is good by substance cannot receive goodness from outside, since it gives goodness to others. So it is clear that the Holy Spirit is foreign not only to corporeal but also to incorporeal creatures, since other substances receive this substance of sanctification, while he is not only incapable of receiving a sanctification foreign to himself, but is moreover its giver and creator. Those who enjoy communion with him are called sharers in the Holy Spirit, sanctified, of course, by him. For it is plainly written: "And outraging the Spirit of grace", undoubtedly of one who sinned after receiving him. If he was sanctified through communion with the Holy Spirit, it is shown that he had been a sharer in him, and that the Holy Spirit is the giver of his sanctification. The Apostle too, writing to the Corinthians and listing those who are to attain the kingdom of heaven, adds: "And such some of you were; but you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God," asserting that the Spirit of God is none other than the Holy Spirit. And he confirms the same in what follows, saying: "No one speaking in the Spirit of God says, Jesus is anathema; and no one says, Jesus is Lord, except in the Holy Spirit," confirming that the Spirit of God is the Holy Spirit.
Chapter 5
5PL 23
Si igitur sanctificator [al. sanctificatio] est, non mutabilis, sed immutabilis substantiae ostenditur. Immutabilem autem substantiam Dei tantum, et unigeniti Filii ejus, manifestissime tradent divina eloquia: convertibilem et mutabilem omnem creaturarum substantiam praedicantia. Ergo quoniam substantia Spiritus sancti non convertibilis, sed inconvertibilis demonstrata est: non erit creaturae δμούαιον [leg. δμούσιος]. Esset quippe et creatura immutabilis, si cum Patre poneretur et Filio, eamdem habens inconvertibilitatem. Omne enim quod alieni boni capax est, ab hac substantia separatur. Tales autem sunt cunctae creaturae Deus vero cum bonus sit, fons et principium bonorum est: facit igitur eos bonos, quibus se impertit, bonus ipse non factus ab alio, sed subsistens: ideo capabilis, et non capax. Unigenitus quoque Filius, ejus sapientia et sanctificatio, non fit sapiens, sed sapientes facit; et non sanctificatur, sed sanctificat. Unde et ipse capabilis est, et non capax. Cum igitur invisibilis creatura, quam rationabilem et incorporalem substantiam vocari consuetudinis est, non sit capabilis, sed capax: si enim capabilis esset, nullius boni capax esset, per se simplex ipsa subsistens, et alterius boni receptatrix; participatione habeat bonum, et non de his quae habentur ab aliis, sed de his quae habent alia intelligatur, Patre et Filio habitis magis quam habentibus; creatura vero habente, et non habita: de Spiritu quoque sancto retractemus, et si quidem ipse quoque participatione alterius sanctimoniae sanctus est, connumere tur caeteris creaturis. Si vero sanctos facit capaces sui, cum Patre ponatur et Filio. Quod autem ab aliis capiatur Spiritus sanctus, et non alia capiat, et nunc, et in Sectarum volumine (prout potuimus) expressimus: et ex omni Scriptura sermonem nostrum affirmare perfacile est. Beatus quoque Apostolus ad Ephesios scribens ait: « In quo et credentes signati estis Spiritu promissionis sancto, qui est pignus haereditatis nostra. » Si enim siguantur quidam Spiritu sancto, formam et speciem ejus assumentes: ex his est Spiritus sanctus, quae habentor, et non habent: habentibus illum signaculo ejus impressis. Ad Corinthios [Ephesios] quoque idem scribens, « Nolite, » inquit, « contristare Spiritum sanctum, in quo signati estis, » signatos esse contestans eos qui susceperant communionem Spiritus sancti. Quo modo enim disciplinae et virtutis assumptor signaculum et figuram (ut ita dicam) in suum sensum recipit ejus scientiae, quam assumpsit: sic et is qui Spiritus sancti particeps efficitur, per communionem ejus fit spiritualis pariter et sanctus.
If, then, he is a sanctifier, he is shown to be of an unchangeable, not a changeable, substance. But the divine oracles hand down most plainly that only the substance of God and of his only-begotten Son is unchangeable, while they proclaim the whole substance of creatures to be alterable and changeable. Therefore, since the substance of the Holy Spirit has been shown to be not alterable but unalterable, he will not be consubstantial with the creature. Otherwise a creature too would be unchangeable, if it were ranked with the Father and the Son, having the same unalterableness. For everything that is capable of receiving a good from outside is separated from this substance; and all creatures are of that kind. God, being good, is the source and beginning of good things: he makes good those to whom he gives himself, being good not because made so by another but by subsisting; therefore he is one who is received, not one who receives. The only-begotten Son too, his wisdom and sanctification, does not become wise but makes others wise; he is not sanctified but sanctifies. So he too is one who is received, not one who receives. Since, then, the invisible creation, which is customarily called the rational and incorporeal substance, is not something received but something that receives (for if it were received, it would not be capable of receiving any good, subsisting simple in itself, and also a receiver of another good), it has the good by participation, and it is to be understood not among the things that are had by others but among those that have others, the Father and the Son being had rather than having, and the creature having and not being had. Let us consider the Holy Spirit too in the same way: if he too is holy by participation in another's holiness, let him be numbered with the other creatures; but if he makes the saints capable of himself, let him be ranked with the Father and the Son. That the Holy Spirit is received by others and does not receive others we have set forth, as we could, both now and in our volume On the Sects, and it is very easy to confirm our argument from the whole of Scripture. The blessed Apostle, writing to the Ephesians, says: "In whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, who is the pledge of our inheritance." If some are sealed with the Holy Spirit, taking on his form and likeness, the Holy Spirit is among the things that are had, not those that have, those who have him being impressed with his seal. Writing to the Corinthians [Ephesians] also, the same apostle says: "Do not grieve the Holy Spirit, in whom you were sealed," testifying that those who had received communion with the Holy Spirit are sealed. For just as one who takes up a discipline and a virtue receives into his mind the seal and, so to speak, the figure of the knowledge he has taken up, so one who becomes a sharer in the Holy Spirit becomes, through communion with him, both spiritual and holy.
Chapter 6
6PL 23
Ipse vero Spiritus sanctus, si unus de creaturis Esset, saltem circumscriptam haberet substantiam, sicut universa quae facta sunt. Nam et si non circumscribantur loco et finibus invisibiles creaturae, tamen proprietate substantiae finiuntur. Spiritus autem sanctus, cum in pluribus sit, non habet substantiam circumscriptam. Mittens quippe Jesus praedicatores doctrinae suae, replevit eos Spiritu; et insufflans in faciem eorum: « Accipite, inquit, Spiritum sanctum, » et, « Euntes, docete omnes gentes, » quasi omnes cunctis gentibus mitteret. Neque enim omnes apostoli ad omnes gentes pariter sunt profecti, sed, quidam in Asiam, quidam in Scythiam, et alii in alias dispersi nationes; secundum dispensationem illius quem secum habebant Spiritus sancti, quo modo et Dominum dicentem, « Vobiscum sum omnibus diebus usque, ad consummationem saeculi. » His et illud congruit: « Accipietis virtutem supervenientis [al. supervenientem] Spiritus sancti in vos; et eritis testes mihi in Jerusalem, et in omni Judaea et Samaria, et usque ad extremum terrae,. » Si ergo hi in extremis finibus terrae ob [al. secundam] testimonium Domini constituti, distabant inter se longissimis spatiis, aderat autem eis inhabitator Spiritus sanctus, incircumscriptam habens substantiam, demonstratur angelica virtus ab hoc prorsus aliena. Angelus quippe qui aderat, verbi gratia, apostolo in Asia oranti, non poterat simul eodem tempore adesse aliis in caeteris partibus mundi constitutis. Spiritus autem sanctus non solum sejunctis a se hominibus praesto est, sed et singulis quibusque angelis, principatibus, thronis, dominationibus inhabitator assistit; et ut homines sanctificans, alterius quam sunt homines, est naturae; sic et alias creaturas sanctificans, alius ab earum est substantia, quoniam omnis creatura non ex sua substantia, sed ex communione alterius sanctitatis sancta perficitur.
If the Holy Spirit himself were one of the creatures, he would at least have a circumscribed substance, like everything that has been made. For even if invisible creatures are not circumscribed by place and boundaries, they are nevertheless bounded by the particular character of their substance. But the Holy Spirit, since he is in many, does not have a circumscribed substance. For when Jesus sent out the preachers of his teaching, he filled them with the Spirit, and breathing into their faces he said: "Receive the Holy Spirit," and "Go, teach all nations," as though he were sending all to all nations. For not all the apostles set out to all the nations alike; some went to Asia, some to Scythia, and others were scattered among other nations, according to the dispensation of the Holy Spirit whom they had with them, just as the Lord said: "I am with you always, to the end of the age." With this agrees also: "You will receive the power of the Holy Spirit coming upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judaea and Samaria and to the end of the earth." If, then, these men, placed at the farthest ends of the earth for the testimony of the Lord, were separated from one another by very great distances, and yet the Holy Spirit was present with them as an indweller, having an uncircumscribed substance, angelic power is shown to be wholly different from him. For an angel who was present, for example, with an apostle praying in Asia could not at the same time be present with others placed in other parts of the world. But the Holy Spirit is present not only to men separated from one another but also dwells with every angel, principality, throne and dominion; and as, sanctifying men, he is of another nature than men, so, sanctifying other creatures, he is other than their substance, since every creature is made holy not by its own substance but by communion in a holiness other than itself.
Chapter 7
7PL 23
Dicti sunt quidem sancti angeli in Evangelio, Salvatore dicente, venturum esse Filium hominis in majestate sua et Patris, et sanctorum angelorum. Et Cornelius in Actibus apostolorum a sancto angelo scribitur [al. subjicitur] accepisse responsum, ut Petrum ad se Christi discipulum vocaret. Verum sancti sunt angeli participatione Spiritus sancti, et inhabitatione [al. communicatione] unigeniti Filii Dei, qui sanctitas est, et communicatio Patris. De quo Salvator ait: « Pater sancte. » Si igitur angeli non ex propria substantia sancti sunt, sed ex participatione sanctae Trinitatis, alia angelorum ostenditur a Trinitate esse substantia. Ut enim Pater sanctificans, alius est ab his qui sanctificantur; et Filius est alius ab his quos efficit sanctos: ita et Spiritus sanctus alterius est substantiae ab his quos sui largitione sanctificat. Si vero haeretici proposuerint, ex natura conditionis suae angelos sanctos esse: consequenter coguntur dicere όμουσίους esse Trinitati, et inconvertibiliter eos juxta substantiam sanctos esse. Si autem hoc refugientes, dixerint, unius quidem naturae esse cum caeteris creaturis, non tamen eamdem habere sanctitatem, quam homines habent: necessario deducetur, ut dicant multo melioris homines esse substantiae cum hi per communionem Trinitatis habeant sanctitatem, et angeli, propria natura sancti, ab ea sint alieni. Sed vota sunt hominum perfectorum, et ad consummationem sanctitatis venientium, aequales angelis fieri. Angeli quippe hominibus, et non homines angelis auxilium tribuunt, ministrantes eis salutem, et annuntiantes eis largiora Dei beneficia. Ex quo liquido ostenditur honorabiliores et multo meliores esse angelos hominibus, per germaniorem, ut ita dicam, et pleniorem Trinitatis assumptionem.
The angels are indeed called holy in the Gospel, when the Saviour says that the Son of Man will come in his majesty and the Father's and that of the holy angels. And in the Acts of the Apostles Cornelius is written to have received an answer from a holy angel, to call Peter, Christ's disciple, to himself. But the angels are holy by participation in the Holy Spirit and by the indwelling of the only-begotten Son of God, who is holiness, and by communion with the Father, of whom the Saviour says: "Holy Father". If, then, the angels are holy not by their own substance but by participation in the holy Trinity, the substance of the angels is shown to be other than the Trinity. For just as the Father who sanctifies is other than those who are sanctified, and the Son is other than those whom he makes holy, so the Holy Spirit is of another substance than those whom he sanctifies by his bounty. But if the heretics propose that the angels are holy by the nature of their own constitution, they are forced in consequence to say that they are consubstantial (ὁμοούσιοι) with the Trinity and holy unalterably by substance. If, avoiding this, they say that the angels are of one nature with the other creatures, yet do not have the same holiness as men have, they will necessarily be led to say that men are of a much better substance, since men have holiness through communion with the Trinity, while the angels, holy by their own nature, are strangers to it. But the hope of perfect men, coming to the fulfilment of holiness, is to become equal to the angels. For it is the angels who give help to men, not men to angels, ministering salvation to them and announcing to them God's more generous benefits. From this it is clearly shown that the angels are more honourable and much better than men, through a closer, so to speak, and fuller reception of the Trinity.
Chapter 8
8PL 23
Quapropter cum alius sit Spiritus sanctus ab his quae ipse sanctificat, non est unius naturae, cum caeteris creaturis quae eum recipiunt. Si autem alterius est naturae a creaturis, et in propria subsistit essentia, increatus et ineffectus ostenditur. Multae Scripturae sunt, quae sine ambiguitate convincant alterius eum a cunctis conditionibus esse naturae. Quidam etiam Spiritu sancto pleni esse dicuntur; nemo autem sive in Scripturis, sive in plenus creatura dicitur. · Neque enim aut Scriptura sibi hoc vindicat, aut sermo communis, ut dicas plenum esse quempiam angelo, throno, dominatione; soli quippe divinae naturae hic convenit sermo. Dicimus autem virtutis et disciplinae quosdam esse plenos: ut illud « Repletus est Spiritu sancto; » non aliud significantes quam plenos esse consummatae atque perfectae virtutis. Scriptum est de Joanne: « Et Spiritu sancto implebitur adhuc ex utero matris suae; » et iterum: « Repleta est Spiritu sancto Elisabeth; » et post alia: « Et Spiritu sancto repletus est Zacharias pater ejus. » Haud dubium, quin et Joannes prophetavit. Nec non in Actibus apostolorum de multis credentibus qui in unum convenerant, refertur: « Repleti sunt Spiritu sancto. » Cum autem participabilis sit Spiritus sanctus, ad similitudinem sapientiae, ac disciplinae, non in cassis nominibus scientiae substantiam possidet; sed per naturam sanctificantem, et implentem bonis universa, bonus ipse subsistit, juxta quam et repleti quidam Spiritu sancto esse dicuntur, ut in Actibus apostolorum scriptum est, « Et repleti sunt omnes Spiritu sancto, et loquebantur verbum Dei cum fiducia. » Quo modo enim qui aliqua disciplina plenus est, qui perfecte eam habet, erudite et subtiliter potest de ea proferre sermonem: sic qui Spiritum sanctum consummate acceperint, ita ut impleantur eo, cum fiducia verbum Dei loquuntur, quia praesens Spiritus sanctus dignam Deo vocem ministrat. Hinc quidam [al. Unde et quidam] cum supercilio ait: « Haec dicit Spiritus sanctus ·; » et Apostolus: « Sed implemini, inquit, Spiritu sancto; » et in multis locis Actuum apostolorum, pleni fuisse Spiritu sancto discipuli Domini scribuntur: « Considerate ergo, fratres, viros ex vobis testimonium habentes septem, plenos Spiritu sancto et sapientia;» et de Stephano: « Cum autem plenus esset Spiritu sancto, intuens in coelum, vidit gloriam Dei, et Jesum stantem a dextris Dei; » et de electionis vase dicitur: «Saulus autem, qui et Paulus, plenus Spiritu sancto, intuens in eum ait; » et in commune de universis credentibus annotatur: « Discipuli quoque replebantur gaudio et Spiritu sancto. » Angeli autem praesentia, sive alicujus alterius excellentis naturae, quae facta est, non implet mentem atque sensum; quia et ipsa aliunde completur. Quo modo enim ex plenitudine quis accipiens Salvatoris, plenus efficitur sapientia, et virtute, et justitia, et sermone Dei: sic qui Spiritu sancto plenus est, statim universis donationibus Dei repletur, sapientia, scientia, fide, caeterisque virtutibus. Qui igitur implet universas creaturas, quae tamen possunt virtutem, et sapientiam capere, non est ex his quae ipse complet. Ex quo colligitur alterius eum esse substantiae, quam sunt omnes creaturae. Diximus et alibi, quia superintelligatur in sancti Spiritus substantia etiam plenitudo munerum divinorum.
So, since the Holy Spirit is other than the things he sanctifies, he is not of one nature with the other creatures that receive him. And if he is of another nature than creatures and subsists in his own essence, he is shown to be uncreated and unmade. Many Scriptures prove beyond doubt that he is of a nature other than all created things. Some are said to be full of the Holy Spirit; but no one, either in the Scriptures or in [common speech], is said to be full of a creature. Neither Scripture nor common speech claims this, that you should say someone is full of an angel, a throne or a dominion; this expression befits the divine nature alone. We do say that some are full of virtue and learning, as in "He was filled with the Holy Spirit", meaning nothing other than that they are full of complete and perfect virtue. It is written of John: "And he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even from his mother's womb"; and again: "Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit"; and after other things: "And Zechariah his father was filled with the Holy Spirit." No doubt John too prophesied. In the Acts of the Apostles also it is reported of many believers who had come together: "They were filled with the Holy Spirit." But although the Holy Spirit can be shared, like wisdom and learning, he does not possess the substance of knowledge in empty names; rather, through a nature that sanctifies and fills all things with good things, he himself subsists as good; and in accordance with this some are said to be filled with the Holy Spirit, as it is written in the Acts of the Apostles: "And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God with boldness." For just as one who is full of some discipline and possesses it perfectly can speak of it learnedly and precisely, so those who have received the Holy Spirit fully, so as to be filled with him, speak the word of God with boldness, because the Holy Spirit, being present, supplies a voice worthy of God. Hence someone says with authority: "Thus says the Holy Spirit"; and the Apostle says: "But be filled with the Holy Spirit"; and in many places of the Acts of the Apostles the Lord's disciples are written to have been full of the Holy Spirit: "Look out, brothers, seven men from among you of good testimony, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom"; and of Stephen: "But being full of the Holy Spirit, he gazed into heaven and saw the glory of God and Jesus standing at the right hand of God"; and of the chosen vessel it is said: "But Saul, who is also Paul, full of the Holy Spirit, looked at him and said"; and of all the believers together it is noted: "The disciples were filled with joy and the Holy Spirit." But the presence of an angel, or of any other excellent nature that has been made, does not fill the mind and understanding, since it too is filled from elsewhere. For just as one who receives from the fullness of the Saviour is made full of wisdom and power and righteousness and the word of God, so one who is full of the Holy Spirit is at once filled with all God's gifts: wisdom, knowledge, faith and the other virtues. He, then, who fills all creatures that can receive virtue and wisdom is not one of the things he fills. From this it follows that he is of another substance than all creatures. We have said elsewhere too that in the substance of the Holy Spirit the fullness of the divine gifts is also understood.
Chapter 9
9PL 23
Denique impossibile est gratiam Dei sortiri quempiam, si non habeat Spiritum sanctum: in quo approbamus cuncta Dei dona consistere. Quod vero is qui habeat eum, sermonem quoque sapientiae, et reliqua bona perfecte consecutus sit: et nunc manifeste sermo demonstrat, et paulo ante diximus, substantiam bonorum Dei Spiritum sanctum esse; cum posuimus exemplum, « Dabit Pater Spiritum sanctum petentibus se ·» et: « Dabit Pater bona petentibus se. » Nec existimare debemus, Spiritum sanctum secundum substantias [al. substantiam] esse divisum, quia multitudo bonorum dicatur: impassibilis enim, et indivisibilis atque immutabilis est; sed juxta differentes efficientias, et intellectus, multis bonorum vocabulis nuncupatur; quia participes suos non juxta unam eamdemque virtutem communione sui donet, quippe cum ad utilitatem uniuscujusque aptus sit, et repleat bonis eos, quibus judicat se adesse debere. Denique Stephanus primus ille testis veritatis, et dignus suo nomine plenus sapientia, et Spiritu sancto dictus est: sapientia consequenter super intellecta, commorante in eo Spiritu sancto, sicut loquitur Scriptura: « Et elegerunt Stephanum plenum fide et Spiritu sancto apostoli; » et: « Stephanus autem, plenus gratia et virtute, faciebat prodigia et signa magna in populo. » Et adhuc de eodem: « Et non valebant resistere sapientiae, et Spiritui, qui loquebatur in illo. » Plenus enim Spiritu sancto vir beatus, et fidei effectus est particeps, quae ex Spiritu sancto venit, juxta illud, « Alii autem fides, in eodem Spiritu. » Et gratiam atque virtutem juxta eumdem Spiritum habens, signa et prodigia magna faciebat in populo. Necnon et illis donationibus secundum eumdem Spiritum affluebat, quae vocantur curationum gratiae atque virtutes. Et haec enim in enumeratione donorum Dei, qui Spiritu, et secundum Spiritum, in prima apostoli Pauli Epistola ad Corinthios collocantur Intantum autem Stephanus divina gratia abundabat, ut nemo contradicentium, et eorum qui adversus eum disputabant, valerent resistere sapientiae, et Spiritui qui loquebatur in illo. Erat quippe e Spiritu sancto sapiens. Unde et ad discipulos suos Jesus perspicue proclamat: Cum introducti fueritis ad principatus, et potestates, et concilia, et synagogas, nolite esse solliciti quid vos oporteat dicere, aut quid loquamini in illo tempore. Dabuntur enim vobis a Spiritu sancto sermones sapientiae, quibus non queant contradicere, ne hi quidem qui vehementer in disputationibus callent.
In short, it is impossible for anyone to obtain the grace of God if he does not have the Holy Spirit, in whom, as we show, all God's gifts consist. That one who has him has also fully obtained the word of wisdom and the other good things, the present passage clearly shows; and a little earlier we said that the Holy Spirit is the substance of God's good things, when we set out the example: "The Father will give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him," and "The Father will give good things to those who ask him." Nor should we think that the Holy Spirit is divided into substances because he is called a multitude of good things; for he is impassible, indivisible and unchangeable. Rather, according to his different workings and the ways he is understood, he is called by many names of good things, because he does not give himself in communion to those who share in him according to one and the same power, since he is fitted to the benefit of each one and fills with good things those with whom he judges he ought to be present. So Stephen, that first witness of the truth, worthy of his name, is called full of wisdom and the Holy Spirit, wisdom being understood as following from the Holy Spirit dwelling in him, as Scripture says: "And the apostles chose Stephen, full of faith and the Holy Spirit"; and: "Stephen, full of grace and power, was doing wonders and great signs among the people." And again of the same man: "And they could not resist the wisdom and the Spirit with which he spoke." For the blessed man, full of the Holy Spirit, became a sharer also in faith, which comes from the Holy Spirit, according to the saying: "To another faith, by the same Spirit." And having grace and power according to the same Spirit, he was doing signs and great wonders among the people. He abounded too, by the same Spirit, in those gifts that are called gifts of healing and powers. For these too are placed in the list of the gifts of God, given by the Spirit and according to the Spirit, in the apostle Paul's first Epistle to the Corinthians. Stephen so abounded in divine grace that none of those who contradicted and disputed against him could resist the wisdom and the Spirit with which he spoke; for he was wise from the Holy Spirit. That is why Jesus plainly proclaims to his disciples: When you are brought before rulers and authorities, councils and synagogues, do not be anxious about what you ought to say or what you will speak at that time; for words of wisdom will be given to you by the Holy Spirit, which they cannot contradict, not even those who are very skilled in disputation.
Chapter 10
10PL 23
Sed ponamus ipsum testimonium, quod ita contexitur: « Cum autem introduxerint vos in synagogas ad principatus et potestates, nolite solliciti esse quomodo aut quid respondeatis, Spiritus enim sanctus docebit vos in eadem hora quae oporteat dicere » Et in alio Evangelio: « Ponite ergo in cordibus vestris non praemeditari, quemadmodum respondeatis: Ego quippe dabo vobis os, et sapientiam cui non valeant contradicere, aut respondere. » Spiritu vero sancto tribuente apostolis verba adversus eos qui Evangelio contraibant, dilucide ostenditur in substantia ejus superintelligi sapientiae et scientiae sermonem. Quomodo autem Salvator in illa hora os et sapientiam discipulis largiatur, quibus contradicere non queant, ne hi quidem qui apud homines eloquentissimi putantur, non est hujus temporis disserere, quia nunc proposuimus ostendere superintelligi semper in Spiritu sancto dona virtutum; ita ut is qui eum habet, donationibus Dei plenus habeatur. Unde et in Isaia, ipse Deus cuidam dicit: « Ponam Spiritum meum super semen tuum, et benedictiones meas super filios tuos. » Nunquam enim accipit quisquam spirituales benedictiones Dei, nisi praecesserit Spiritus sanctus. Qui enim acceperit Spiritum sanctum, consequenter habebit benedictiones, id est, sapientiam, et intellectum, et caetera, de quibus ita scribit Apostolus: « Propter hoc et nos, ex quo die audivimus, non cessamus orantes pro vobis, et deprecantes, ut impleamini cognitione voluntatis ejus in omni sapientia, et intelligentia spirituali: ambulantes digne Deo Eos enim qui digne sibi [al. bonis] per opera, et sermones, et prudentiam incedunt, impleri ait voluntate Dei, ponentis super eos Spiritum sanctum, ut impleantur sapientia et intellectu, et reliquis spiritualibus bonis; sapientia autem, et intellectus, quae in Spiritu sancto sunt, a Deo dantur. « Dominus, » inquit, « dabit sapientiam; et a facie ejus sapientia, et intellectus procedit; » cum ea sapientia quae ab hominibus venit, non sit spiritualis, sed carnea et humana. De hac itaque Apostolus scribit: « Non in sapientia carnali, sed in gratia Dei conversati sumus in [al. in hoc] mundo; » carnalem sapientiam dicens, quae in rebus corporeis ex humano subsistit cogitatu. Porro spiritualis sapientia et intellectualis, circa invisibilia et intellectualia se tenens, per operationem Spiritus sancti capientibus se sui praesentiam tribuit. In multis quoque aliis locis Apostolus memorat in Spiritus sancti substantia Dei munera commorari [al. commemorari]; sicut in illo: «Deus autem spei repleat vos omni gaudio, et pace in credendo, ut abundetis in spe, et virtute Spiritus sancti. »
But let us set out the testimony itself, which runs as follows: "When they bring you into the synagogues before rulers and authorities, do not be anxious how or what you will answer; for the Holy Spirit will teach you in that same hour what you ought to say." And in another Gospel: "Settle it, then, in your hearts not to prepare beforehand how you will answer; for I will give you a mouth and wisdom which they will not be able to contradict or answer." Since the Holy Spirit gives the apostles words against those who opposed the Gospel, it is clearly shown that the word of wisdom and of knowledge is understood as contained in his substance. How the Saviour in that hour gives his disciples a mouth and wisdom that cannot be contradicted, not even by those thought most eloquent among men, it is not the time to discuss now, since we have now set out to show that the gifts of the virtues are always understood to be contained in the Holy Spirit, so that one who has him is held to be full of God's gifts. That is why in Isaiah God himself says to someone: "I will put my Spirit upon your seed, and my blessings upon your sons." For no one ever receives God's spiritual blessings unless the Holy Spirit has come first. For one who has received the Holy Spirit will in consequence have the blessings, that is, wisdom and understanding and the rest, of which the Apostle writes: "For this reason we too, from the day we heard, have not ceased praying for you and asking that you may be filled with the knowledge of his will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding, walking worthily of God." He says that those who walk worthily of him in works and words and prudence are filled with the will of God, who puts the Holy Spirit upon them so that they may be filled with wisdom and understanding and the other spiritual good things. Wisdom and understanding, which are in the Holy Spirit, are given by God. "The Lord," it says, "will give wisdom, and from his face come wisdom and understanding"; whereas the wisdom that comes from men is not spiritual but fleshly and human. Of this the Apostle writes: "Not in fleshly wisdom but in the grace of God have we conducted ourselves in the world," calling fleshly wisdom that which subsists in bodily matters from human thought. But spiritual and intellectual wisdom, concerned with invisible and intellectual things, gives its presence to those who receive it through the working of the Holy Spirit. In many other places too the Apostle records that God's gifts dwell in the substance of the Holy Spirit, as in that saying: "May the God of hope fill you with all joy and peace in believing, so that you may abound in hope and in the power of the Holy Spirit."
Chapter 11
11PL 23
Deus autem largitor bonorum, spem quam promisit, reddet [ al. reddit ] in virtute Spiritus sancti, his qui habent illum; gaudio et pace complet eos qui imperturbatam et sedatam cogitationem possidentes, laetas habent mentes, et ab omni perturbationum tempestate tranquillas. Qui autem in virtute Spiritus sancti praedicta bona fuerint consecuti, etiam rectam fidem in Trinitatis mysterio consequentur. In alio quoque loco ejusdem Epistolae, « Non est, » inquit, « regnum Dei cibus et potus; sed justitia et pax, et gaudium in Spiritu sancto. » In Spiritu enim sancto justitiam, id est, universam virtutem, et quam supra diximus pacem, Dei gaudio copulatam esse asserens, his qui se audire poterant, manifestissime probat, non alia haec bona quam Spiritus sancti esse substantiam. Cum ergo haec bona ex largitione Spiritus sancti ad homines veniant, vocatio gentium quam Introduxit per doctrinam evangelicam, acceptabilis et sanctificata redditur in Spiritu sancto; quia et in hac sanctificatos, et acceptos faciens Spiritus sanctus, substantia est bonorum Dei. Et qui illo plenus est, universi juxta rationem agit, docens recte, vivens irreprehensibiliter, signa atque portenta vere perfecteque demonstrans. Habet enim fortitudinem Spiritus sancti praestantem sibi thesaurum, et causam plenitudinis omnium bonorum. Novit Petrus discipulus Domini Jesu, largitionem Spiritus sancti donorum Dei esse naturam. Ait quippe ad eos qui objurgabant introitum suum ad Cornelium: « Si itaque aequalem gratiam dedit illis Deus praehens Spiritum sanctum, quomodo et nobis in principio, ego quis eram qui possem prohibere Dominum? » Et insuper ad suos, « Agnitor,» inquit, « cordium Deus testimonium tribuit eis dans Spiritum sanctum sicut et nobis: et nihil discrevit inter nos et eos, fide mundans corda eorum. » In hunc sensum congruit etiam illud quod in multis locis dicitur Spiritum sanctum dari a Domino: « Jacob puer meus, suscipiam eum; Israel electus meus, suscipiet eum anima mea; dedi spiritum meum in eo; » et adhuc: « Qui dat afflatum populo constituto super eam, » haud dubium quin terram, « et spiritum calcantibus eam » Ostendimus autem supra non alium esse Spiritum Dei, et alium Spiritum sanctum. Paulus quoque,« Charitas,» inquit, « Dei diffusa est in cordibus vestris [ al. nostris] per Spiritum sanctum qui datus est vobis;» et illud: « Quanto magis Pater vester coelestis dabit Spiritum sanctum petentibus se? » Iste autem Spiritus effusus quoque esse a Deo super omnem carnem dicitur, ut prophetent, et visiones videant, qui eum acceperint, secundum Joelem, qui ex persona Dei loquitur: « Effundam de spiritu meo super omnem carnem: et prophetabunt filii vestri, et filiae vestrae. » Effusio quippe Spiritus causa exsistit [al. exstes] prophetandi, et videndi sensum pulchritudinemque veritatis. Ipsum quoque effusionis nomen, increatam Spiritus sancti substantiam probat. Neque enim Deus eum angelum mittit, aut aliam creaturam: Effundam, dicit, de angelo meo, aut principatu, aut throno, aut dominatione. In solis quippe his quae ab aliis participantur, hic sermo consentit: sicut nunc, et paulo ante de charitate Dei diximus, quae effusa est in cordibus eorum qui Spiritum sanctum receperunt, « Charitas, » inquit, « Dei diffusa est in cordibus vestris, per Spiritum sanctum, qui datus est vobis. » Salvator quoque, quia et ipse capabilis est, in similitudinem quoque unguenti effusus dicitur: « Unguentum effusum nomen tuum. » Nam ut unguentum quod in vase continetur, habet quidem odoris substantiam, sed prohibetur longius spargi, quia vase intrinsecus clauditur: cum autem vas foris fuerit effusum, emittit procul beneolentiam suam: ita Christi nomen beneolens, ante adventum ejus in solo Israelis populo versabatur, quasi Judaea vase inclusum:« Notus enim, » ait, « in Judaea Deus, in Israel magnum nomen ejus,. » Quando autem coruscans in carne sua Salvator, in universam terram, quin potius in omnem creaturam extendit vocabulum suum. impleto eo quod scriptum est: « Quam admirabile est nomen tuum in universa terra! » quibus consequenter Apostolus loquitur: « Non enim aliud nomen datum est sub coelo, in quo oporteat salvari nos [ al. oportet salvos fieri ]; » et Psalmista ad Dominum loquitur, « Magnificasti super omnia nomen sanctum tuum: » tunc completum est, « Unguentum effusum nomen tuum. » Significat autem effusionis verbum largam et divitem muneris abundantiam.
God, the giver of good things, will render the hope he promised in the power of the Holy Spirit to those who have him; he fills with joy and peace those who, possessing an untroubled and calm mind, have hearts that are glad and tranquil from every storm of disturbance. And those who have obtained the good things just mentioned in the power of the Holy Spirit will also attain right faith in the mystery of the Trinity. In another place of the same epistle he says: "The kingdom of God is not food and drink, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit." By asserting that righteousness, that is, all virtue, and the peace we spoke of above, are joined to the joy of God in the Holy Spirit, he proves most plainly to those who could hear him that these good things are nothing other than the substance of the Holy Spirit. Since, then, these good things come to men from the bounty of the Holy Spirit, the calling of the Gentiles, which he brought in through the teaching of the Gospel, is made acceptable and sanctified in the Holy Spirit; for in this too the Holy Spirit, making them sanctified and accepted, is the substance of God's good things. And one who is full of him does all things according to reason, teaching rightly, living blamelessly, showing signs and wonders truly and perfectly; for he has the strength of the Holy Spirit as a treasure supplying him and the cause of the fullness of all good things. Peter, the disciple of the Lord Jesus, knew that the bestowal of the Holy Spirit is the nature of God's gifts. For he says to those who reproached him for going in to Cornelius: "If, then, God gave them the same grace, giving the Holy Spirit, as he did to us at the beginning, who was I that I could hinder the Lord?" And further, to his own: "God, who knows the heart, bore witness to them by giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us, and he made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith." With this sense agrees also what is said in many places, that the Holy Spirit is given by the Lord: "Jacob my servant, I will uphold him; Israel my chosen, my soul will receive him; I have put my Spirit upon him"; and again: "Who gives breath to the people upon it," no doubt the earth, "and spirit to those who walk on it." We showed above that the Spirit of God is not one and the Holy Spirit another. Paul also says: "The love of God has been poured out in your hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to you"; and that saying: "How much more will your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him?" This Spirit is also said to have been poured out by God upon all flesh, so that those who receive him may prophesy and see visions, according to Joel, who speaks in the person of God: "I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh, and your sons and your daughters will prophesy." For the pouring out of the Spirit is the cause of prophesying and of seeing the meaning and the beauty of truth. The very word "pouring out" proves the uncreated substance of the Holy Spirit. For God does not send an angel or another creature in this way: does he say, I will pour out of my angel, or principality, or throne, or dominion? This expression fits only things that are shared by others, as we said now and a little earlier of the love of God, which has been poured out in the hearts of those who have received the Holy Spirit: "The love of God has been poured out in your hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to you." The Saviour too, since he also is one who is received, is said to be poured out like ointment: "Your name is ointment poured out." For just as ointment held in a vessel has the substance of its fragrance but is prevented from spreading far because it is shut up inside the vessel, but when the vessel is poured out it sends its sweet smell far off, so the fragrant name of Christ, before his coming, was found only among the people of Israel, shut up, as it were, in the vessel of Judaea: "God is known in Judaea," it says, "his name is great in Israel." But when the Saviour shone forth in his flesh, he extended his name to the whole earth, or rather to every creature, fulfilling what is written: "How wonderful is your name in all the earth!" To which the Apostle accordingly says: "For no other name has been given under heaven by which we must be saved"; and the Psalmist says to the Lord: "You have magnified your holy name above all things." Then was fulfilled: "Your name is ointment poured out." The word "pouring out" signifies a generous and rich abundance of the gift.
Chapter 12
12PL 23
Itaque cum unus quis alicubi, aut duo Spiritum sanctum accipiunt, non dicitur, Effundam de spiritu: sed tunc quando in universas gentes munus Spiritus sancti redundaverit. Et ad Titum Apostolus salutem factam gentibus commemorat: « Non ex operibus justitiae quae fecimus nos: sed per lavacrum secundae regenerationis, et innovationis Spiritus sancti, quem effudit super nos abundanter. » Et hic enim largam attributionem Spiritus, verbum effusionis ostendit. Ex quibus universis docemur, capabilem Spiritus sancti esse substantiam, et ex hoc increatam. Capabilem substantiam vocat, quae capitur a pluribus, et eis sui consortium tribuit: capacem vero eam quae communicatione substantiae alterius impletur [ Thol. impleatur]: et capiens aliud, ipsa non capitur [Val capiatur] ab alio. Capabili quippe statim inconvertibile, et inconvertibili aeternum est consequens: quomodo e contrario capienti convertibile, convertibili creabile subsequens est. Nihil ergo de creaturis inconvertibile, propter quod neque sempiternum est. Non solum igitur quod in hominibus est rationale, convertitur, et creatur, verum etiam in omnibus creaturis haec eadem conversio reperitur. Nam et angelorum conversiones et ruinas divina eloquia demonstrant. Licet enim multitudo angelorum, et aliarum excellentium virtutum, in beatitudine et sanctimonia perseverent, tamen cum in ea quae similem habent naturam conversa sint, dilucide ostenditur in primo eos statu non per immutabilitatem suae substantiae, sed per sollicitius in Domino servitium permanere. Neque enim potest coaequalium diversa esse natura. Nam quia omne gentis hominum mortale est, et singuli homines mortales sunt, ut e diverso quoque si qua de superioribus immortalia sunt, haud dubium, quin omnia in eodem genere et specie constituta, sint immortalia.
So when one or two people somewhere receive the Holy Spirit, it is not said, "I will pour out of my Spirit", but only when the gift of the Holy Spirit overflows to all nations. And to Titus the Apostle recalls the salvation brought about for the Gentiles: "Not by works of righteousness that we have done, but through the washing of the second regeneration and the renewal of the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out upon us richly." Here too the word "pouring out" shows the generous bestowal of the Spirit. From all this we are taught that the substance of the Holy Spirit is one that is received, and therefore uncreated. He calls a substance "received" which is taken in by many and gives them a share in itself; but a "receiving" substance is one that is filled by communion with another substance, and, receiving something else, is not itself received by another. For to what is received, unchangeableness follows at once, and to what is unchangeable, eternity; just as, on the contrary, to what receives, changeableness follows, and to what is changeable, createdness. Nothing among creatures, then, is unchangeable, and for that reason nothing is everlasting. Not only is the rational element in men changeable and created; the same changeableness is found in all creatures. For the divine oracles show the changes and falls of angels too. For although the multitude of angels and of the other excellent powers persevere in blessedness and holiness, yet since beings that have the same nature have been changed, it is clearly shown that they remain in their first state not through the unchangeableness of their substance but through more careful service in the Lord. For beings of equal rank cannot have different natures. Since the whole human race is mortal, individual men are mortal; so conversely, if any of the higher beings are immortal, there is no doubt that all those placed in the same genus and species are immortal.
Chapter 13
13PL 23
Cum autem haec se ita habeant, etiam si unus angelus convertibilis apparuerit, omnes convertibiles erunt, licet non sint conversi in beatitudine perseverantes; quomodo et cuncta hominum corpora divisibilia sunt, quanquam non omnia dividatur. Quaedam enim eorum passa divisionem, et reliquorum similium sui, naturam interpretantur, His ita edissertis, alterius substantiae a visibilibus in invisibilibus creaturis Spiritus sanctus ostenditur. Si autem hoc verum est, impiissime quidam inter omnia connumerant Spiritum sanctum, dicentes in eo quod omnia per Verbum a Deo facta sunt, etiam significari Spiritus sancti facturam. Neque enim unum ex omnibus, sed aliud extra omnia per substantiam ex utroque demonstratus est Spiritus sanctus. Nam si creatura, ut superius ostendimus, dividitur in corporalia, et incorporalia: et conditus est Spiritus sanctus utique aut visibilis, aut invisibilis creatura erit, id est, corporalis, aut incorporalis. Verum corpus nequaquam erit, sicut prius diximus, cum doceat, et scientiam praestet, et a sensu et anima capiatur. Sed neque invisibilis creatura erit, ut paulo ante de eo disputavimus. Unde et Apostolus in Epistola quam ad Hebraeos scripsit, alium eum esse ab omnibus angelis demonstrat, dicens: « Cui enim angelorum dixit aliquando: Sede a dextris meis, donec ponam inimicos tuos scabellum pedum tuorum? Nonne omnes sunt administratores spiritus, in ministerium missi, propter eos qui accepturi erant salutem? » Et post alia: « Quomodo nos effugiemus tantam negligentes salutem? Quae principium accipiens ad loquendum per Dominum, ab his qui audierunt in nos confirmata est, testimonium dante Deo signis, et prodigiis et variis virtutibus, et Spiritus sancti divisionibus juxta suam voluntatem. » Hoc enim quod ait, « cui angelorum,» aeque accipitur, ac si diceret, nulli: per angelicum nomen significans omnium substantiam invisibilium creaturarum. Neque enim ulli quidem angelorum, et aliae cuidam rationabili creaturae dixit Deus: « Sede a dextris meis. » In commune itaque sermo pronuntiat, non esse dictum cuiquam creaturae, « Sede a dextris meis. » Et hoc in commune de creatura. Et pronuntians de omnibus invisibilibus creaturis, ait eas esse administratores spiritus. Propter quod subjecit: « Nonne omnes sunt administratores spiritus, in ministerium missi? » Licet enim non omnes singillatim invisibiles creaturae missae sunt [al. sint], tamen quia ejusdem generis et honoris aliae missae sunt, quodammodo et ipsae possibilitate sunt missae: missarum consortes aequalisque substantiae. Quo modo igitur alius est ab universis creaturis Dominus, per quem principium ad loquendum acceperat illa magna salus, cujus negligentes Apostolus nolens nos esse, ait: « Quomodo nos effugiemus tantam negligentes salutem, quae principium accipiens ad loquendum per Dominum, ab his qui audierunt in nos confirmata est? » sed et Deus qui testimonium perhibet signis et portentis isti saluti, alius est ab omnibus administratoriis spiritibus: sic et Spiritus sanctus, cujus divisionibus juxta voluntatem ejus testimonium perhibet Deus, distribuens eum, non per concisionis partes, sed per communionem quibus eum praestare decreverit: alterius est et ipse substantiae ab his in quae dispartitur effusus.
Since this is so, if even one angel has been shown to be changeable, all will be changeable, even if those persevering in blessedness have not changed; just as all human bodies are divisible, though not all are divided, since some of them, having undergone division, show the nature of the rest that are like them. With this set out, the Holy Spirit is shown to be of another substance than both the visible and the invisible creatures. If this is true, some most impiously number the Holy Spirit among all things, saying that in the statement that all things were made by God through the Word, the making of the Holy Spirit is also signified. For the Holy Spirit has been shown to be not one among all things but, by his substance, something other, beyond all things, on both counts. For if creation, as we showed above, is divided into corporeal and incorporeal, and the Holy Spirit was created, he will certainly be either a visible or an invisible creature, that is, corporeal or incorporeal. But he will not be a body at all, as we said before, since he teaches and gives knowledge and is received by the mind and the soul. Nor will he be an invisible creature, as we argued a little earlier. That is why the Apostle too, in the epistle he wrote to the Hebrews, shows that he is other than all angels, saying: "To which of the angels did he ever say, Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies the footstool of your feet? Are they not all ministering spirits, sent out to serve for the sake of those who were to receive salvation?" And after other things: "How shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation? Having first been spoken through the Lord, it was confirmed to us by those who heard, God bearing witness with signs and wonders and various powers and distributions of the Holy Spirit according to his will." When he says, "To which of the angels?" it is taken as if he said, "To none", signifying by the name of angel the substance of all invisible creatures. For to none of the angels, nor to any other rational creature, did God say, "Sit at my right hand." So the statement declares in general that "Sit at my right hand" was said to no creature; and this is said of creation in general. And speaking of all invisible creatures, he says that they are ministering spirits; which is why he added: "Are they not all ministering spirits, sent out to serve?" For although not all invisible creatures individually have been sent, yet since others of the same kind and rank have been sent, in a way they too are sent potentially, sharing the same substance as those sent. Just as, then, the Lord is other than all creatures, the Lord through whom that great salvation first began to be spoken, which the Apostle does not want us to neglect when he says, "How shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation, which, having first been spoken through the Lord, was confirmed to us by those who heard?", and as God, who bears witness to this salvation with signs and wonders, is other than all the ministering spirits, so also the Holy Spirit, by whose distributions according to his will God bears witness, distributing him not by cutting him into parts but by communion to those to whom he has decided to give him, is himself of a substance other than those among whom he is poured out and shared.
Chapter 14
14PL 23
Igitur quoniam approbavimus juxta Scripturarum sensum, alium extra omnem creaturam esse Spiritum sanctum, incassum, imo impie quidam creatum eum esse ostendere volentes, testimonio utuntur, quo omnia per Verbum facta referuntur; ut scilicet in omnibus etiam aeterna substantia contineatur. Et quia ad conditionem ejus approbandam etiam propheticum sermonem usurpant, dicente Deo, « Creo Spiritum: » etiam in hoc eos monstrare debemus prorsus ab intellectu veritatis alienos. Neque enim de Spiritu sancto propositus sermo prophetae fuit, ut ex ipsa serie et contextu eloquii intelligitur. Siquidem Amos propheta ex persona Dei, « Praeparare,» inquit, « ad invocandum Deum tuum, o Israel: quoniam ego sum firmans tonitruum, et creans spiritum, et annuntians in homines Christum suum: faciens diluculum et nebulam, et ascendens super excelsa terrae: Dominus Deus omnipotens nomen ejus. » Deus enim qui se spiritum condere fuerat praelocutus, et facere: et tonitruum dixit firmare et diluculum et nebulas facere. Si igitur in praedicta narratione perseveramus, id est, in tonitruo et diluculo et nubibus, eumdem narrationis ordinem etiam in spiritu tenere debemus, ut id quod dicitur a Deo tale sit: Ut invoces me, qui Deus sum, qui universa procuro, qui et creator sum omnium, qui firmo tonitruum, et condo spiritum, qui diluculum et nebulam ad quasdam utilitates facio hominum; praeparare, ut invoces, o Israel; ut cum praeparatus fueris ad invocandum, et me oraveris, qui supradicta constituo, felicitate temporum, et aliorum bonorum largitionibus perfruaris, me tibi per singulos annos omnia juxta naturae ordinem ministrante, ut fecunde annus fluat, ut suis spatiis horarum momenta decurrant, ut suo tempore tonitrua mugiant, ut salutaris aura opportunis flatibus inspiret. Si vero per allegoriam, tonitruum et diluculum, et nebula, et creatio spiritus intelligantur, non substantiam rei, sed figuratam interpretationem significabunt.
Since, then, we have shown according to the sense of the Scriptures that the Holy Spirit is other, beyond all creation, some who want to show that he was created use, in vain and indeed impiously, the testimony that reports that all things were made through the Word, so that the eternal substance too would be included in "all". And since, to prove his creation, they also appropriate the prophetic saying in which God says, "I create spirit", we must show that in this too they are wholly strangers to the understanding of the truth. For the prophet's statement was not about the Holy Spirit, as is understood from the order and context of the words. The prophet Amos says in the person of God: "Prepare to call upon your God, O Israel; for I am he who makes firm the thunder and creates spirit and announces his Christ to men, who makes the dawn and the mist and goes up on the high places of the earth: the Lord God Almighty is his name." For God, who had said beforehand that he founds and makes spirit, also said that he makes the thunder firm and makes the dawn and the mists. If, then, we keep to the narrative already given, that is, to thunder and dawn and clouds, we must keep the same order of narrative in the case of spirit too, so that what God says is this: That you may call upon me, who am God, who provide for all things, who am creator of all, who make firm the thunder and found the wind, who make the dawn and the mist for certain benefits of men: prepare to call upon me, O Israel, so that when you are prepared to call upon me and have prayed to me, who appoint the things mentioned, you may enjoy favourable seasons and the bestowal of other good things, while I supply you year by year with everything according to the order of nature, so that the year may run fruitfully, the hours pass in their proper spaces, the thunder roar in its season, and a healthy breeze blow with timely winds. But if the thunder and the dawn and the mist and the creation of the spirit are understood allegorically, they will signify not the substance of the thing but a figurative interpretation.
Chapter 15
15PL 23
Quod si e diverso opposuerit manifeste de Spiritu sancto haec dici, quia inferatur ad creationem Spiritus, illud quod sequitur: « Et annuntians in omnes homines Christum suum; » in Hebraeo habetur, « annuntiat in hominem loquelam suam; » quod scilicet qui creator est omnium, ipse etiam prophetis [al. prophetas] inspiret, et suam per eos hominibus indicet voluntatem. Et ad hoc respondendum est, quia quidam haeretici alium extra creatorem Dominum Patrem Salvatoris mentiuntur, hoc impiissime praedicantes: non sceleratam eorum suspicionem providentes a Deo percuti, dicente: Ego formans [ Vatic. firmans] tonitruum, et creans spiritum et alias mundi partes faciens et gubernans, annuntio in homines Christum meum. Et hoc enim providentiae meae opus super omnia opera mea est, ut non solum eorum quae foris sunt, sed et quae ad emolumentum animae et mentis utilitatem [al. humilitatem] pertinent, causa subsistam. Ego hoc quod dicitur, « Creo spiritum, » aeque arbitror positum, ac si diceretur, creans ventum. Deus quippe flatus hos, qui per aeris motum efficiuntur, dispositione sua ducit, secundum illud quod alibi legimus: « Qui producit ventos de thesauris suis. » Bene autem quod in ipsa sententia non ait qui creavi: sed « qui creo spiritum, » Si enim de substantialitate Spiritus sancti sermo esset, dixisset utique, qui creavi. Neque enim semper eundem creat. Nunc autem consequenter de flatu dictum est, « qui creo,» quia non semel venti facti sunt, sed in eo quod subsistunt, quotidie fiunt. Neque enim frustra sine articulo, qui in Graeco sermone singularitatis significator est, nunc spiritus creatus dicitur, quoniam non est sanctus, cum pene semper Spiritus sanctus cum articulo nominetur, ut in illo αυτά τδ Πνεύμα, id est « ipse Spiritus testimonium perhibet spiritui nostro; » et alibi, Αύτός έστιν τδ ζωοποιούν, id est,« ipse est qui vivificat.» Et rursum: « Sic et quae Dei sunt, nemo cognovit nisi τδ Πνεύμα, id est « Spiritus Dei: » τδ γάρ Πνεύμα, hocest,« Spiritus enim scrutatur omnia, etiam alta Dei. » Et multa quae de Scripturis sacris excerpere possibile est. Quod sicubi raro sine articulo nominatur Spiritus sanctus. sciendum est cum additamento eum nominari significante magnificentiam ejus. Siquidem dicitur aliquando et sine articulo, cum non ipse per se, sed participatio ejus ostenditur: ut puta, « Spiritus Eliae; » et, « Spiritu ambulate, » et quaecunque his similia sunt.
But if, on the other side, someone objects that this is clearly said of the Holy Spirit because what follows is added to the creation of the spirit, "and announces his Christ to all men" (in the Hebrew it reads, "announces his speech to man", namely that he who is creator of all himself also inspires the prophets and through them makes his will known to men), the answer to this too is that certain heretics falsely claim another, besides the Creator, as the Lord and Father of the Saviour, most impiously preaching this; and they do not foresee that their wicked supposition is struck down by God, who says: I, who make firm the thunder and create the wind and make and govern the other parts of the world, announce my Christ to men. For this work of my providence is above all my works, that I should be the cause not only of outward things but also of those that serve the profit of the soul and the benefit of the mind. I think that the saying "I create spirit" is put as if it said "creating the wind". For God by his ordering leads these blasts, which are produced by the movement of the air, according to what we read elsewhere: "Who brings out the winds from his storehouses." And it is well that in the sentence itself he does not say, "who created", but "who creates spirit". For if the statement were about the substance of the Holy Spirit, he would certainly have said "who created"; for he does not always create the same thing. But here, consistently, it is said of the wind, "who creates", because the winds were not made once for all, but in their very existence are made every day. Nor is it without reason that the created spirit is now named without the article, which in Greek signifies singularity, since it is not holy; whereas the Holy Spirit is almost always named with the article, as in αὐτὸ τὸ Πνεῦμα, that is, "the Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit"; and elsewhere, τὸ ζῳοποιοῦν, that is, "he it is who gives life". And again: "So also no one has known the things of God except τὸ Πνεῦμα," that is, "the Spirit of God": τὸ γὰρ Πνεῦμα, that is, "for the Spirit searches all things, even the depths of God." And there are many other passages that could be excerpted from the sacred Scriptures. Where the Holy Spirit is rarely named without the article, it must be understood that he is named with an addition signifying his greatness. He is indeed sometimes named without the article when not he himself but participation in him is shown, as for example "the spirit of Elijah" and "walk by the Spirit", and any similar sayings.
Chapter 16
16PL 23
Quoniam igitur ex his, quae memoravi, et ex multis aliis, non esse creaturam Spiritum sanctum demonstratum est, nusquam conditionibus connumeratus est, sed semper cum Patre et Filio positus: nunc videamus quam cum utroque habeat indifferentiam [al. differentiam]. In fine Epistolae secundae, quam ad Corinthios scribit Paulus, ait: « Gratia Domini nostri Jesu Christi, et charitas Dei, et communicatio sancti Spiritus, sit semper cum omnibus vobis. » Ostenditur quippe ex sermone praesenti una Trinitatis assumptio: cum is qui gratiam Christi accepit, habeat eam tam per administrationem Patris, quam per largitionem Spiritus sancti. Datur enim a Deo Patre et [al. a Domino] Jesu Christo, juxta illud: « Gratia vobiscum, et pax a Deo Patre, et Domino Jesu Christo, » non aliam dante gratiam Patre et aliam Salvatore. Siquidem et a Patre et Domino Jesu Christo eam dari describit [Vatic. scribit], Spiritus sancti communicatione completam. Nam et ipse Spiritus dictus est gratia, secundum illud: « Et spiritui gratiae injuriam faciens, in quo sanctificatus est. » In Zacharia quoque repromittit Deus effusurum se, id est, abundantissime tributurum Jerusalem spiritum gratiae et miserationis. Cum enim quis Spiritus sancti acceperit gratiam, habebit eam datam a Deo Patre, et a Jesu Christo Domino nostro. Una igitur gratia, Patris et Filii, et Spiritus sancti operatione completa, Trinitas unius substantiae demonstratur. In alio quoque loco: « Charitas, » inquit, « Dei cum omnibus vobis, » quae a Trinitate et tribuitur, et firmatur. Ait quippe Salvator: « Qui audit verba mea, et servat ea, hic est qui diligit me. Qui autem diligit me, diligetur a Patre meo, et ego diligam eum. » Neque enim alia dilectio est Salvatoris super his qui amantur, et alia dilectio Patris. Deus enim diligit in salutem, quia « sic dilexit Deus mundum, ut Filium suum unigenitum daret: ut omnis qui credit in ipsum [al. Filium), non pereat, sed habeat vitam aeternam. » Similiter et Filius, qui vita est, ut tribuat vitam et salutem, diligit eos quos vult fieri meliores. Unde amare se dicit eum qui amatur a Patre. Et de eo ponitur in propheta: « Et ipse salvabit illos, quia dilexit illos. »
Since, then, from what I have recalled and from many other things it has been shown that the Holy Spirit is not a creature, and he is nowhere numbered among created things but always placed with the Father and the Son, let us now see what lack of difference he has from each of them. At the end of the second epistle he writes to the Corinthians, Paul says: "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the communion of the Holy Spirit be always with you all." The present passage shows that there is one reception of the Trinity, since one who has received the grace of Christ has it both through the ministry of the Father and through the bestowal of the Holy Spirit. For it is given by God the Father and by Jesus Christ, according to the saying, "Grace to you and peace from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ", the Father not giving one grace and the Saviour another. For he describes it as given by the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, made complete by the communion of the Holy Spirit. For the Spirit himself is called grace, according to the saying: "And outraging the Spirit of grace, by whom he was sanctified." In Zechariah too God promises that he will pour out, that is, most abundantly bestow on Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and mercy. For when someone has received the grace of the Holy Spirit, he will have it as given by God the Father and by Jesus Christ our Lord. Since, then, there is one grace of the Father and the Son, made complete by the working of the Holy Spirit, the Trinity is shown to be of one substance. In another place too: "The love of God be with you all," which is both given and confirmed by the Trinity. For the Saviour says: "He who hears my words and keeps them, he it is who loves me; and he who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I will love him." For the Saviour's love toward those who are loved is not one thing and the Father's love another. For God loves unto salvation, since "God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten Son, so that everyone who believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." Likewise the Son, who is life, loves those whom he wants to become better, so as to give them life and salvation. That is why he says that he loves the one who is loved by the Father. And of him it is set down in the prophet: "And he himself will save them, because he loved them."
Chapter 17
17PL 23
Hanc dilectionem, fructum esse Spiritus sancti, contestatur Apostolus, sicut et gaudium, et pacem, quae a Patre ministratur et Filio, dicens: « Fructus autem spiritus, gaudium, pax, charitas. » Quae charitas effusa est in cordibus credentium per Spiritum sanctum. « Charitas quippe, ait, Dei diffusa est in cordibus vestris [Thol. nostris] in Spiritu sancto. » Omnis quippe qui communicat Spiritui sancto, per participationem ejus communicat, juxta illud: « Et communicatio sancti Spiritus sit semper cum omnibus vobis. » Et in alio loco: « Si qua communicatio Spiritus. » Cum habuerit sapientiam Dei et sermonem, et in omnibus veritatem: habebit quoque consortium sanctitatis in Patre, et Filio, et Spiritu sancto, « Fidelis autem Deus, per quem vocati estis in communicationem Filii ejus. » Scribit et Joannes de Patre: « Si in lumine ambulamus, sicut ipse est in lumine, communicationem habemus cum illo. » Et adhuc: « Communicatio autem nostra cum Patre et Filio ejus Jesu Christo. » Igitur quicunque communicat Spiritui sancto, statim communicat Patri et Filio. Et qui charitatem habet Patris, habet eam a Filio, contributam per Spiritum sanctum. Sed et qui particeps est gratiae Jesu Christi, eamdem gratiam habet, datam a Patre per Spiritum sanctum. In omnibus enim approbatur eamdem operationem esse Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti. Quorum autem una est operatio, una est et substantia: quia quae eidem substantiae δμούσια sunt, easdem habent operationes; et quae alterius substantiae, et άνομούσια, dissona atque diversa sunt.
That this love is a fruit of the Holy Spirit, as are joy and peace, which are supplied by the Father and the Son, the Apostle testifies, saying: "The fruit of the Spirit is joy, peace, love." This love has been poured out in the hearts of believers through the Holy Spirit: "For the love of God," he says, "has been poured out in your hearts in the Holy Spirit." For everyone who has communion with the Holy Spirit has communion by participation in him, according to the saying: "And the communion of the Holy Spirit be always with you all." And in another place: "If there is any communion of the Spirit." When he has the wisdom and word of God and truth in all things, he will also have fellowship in holiness in the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit: "God is faithful, through whom you were called into the communion of his Son." John too writes of the Father: "If we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have communion with him." And again: "Our communion is with the Father and his Son Jesus Christ." Whoever, then, has communion with the Holy Spirit at once has communion with the Father and the Son. And one who has the love of the Father has it from the Son, bestowed through the Holy Spirit. And one who shares in the grace of Jesus Christ has the same grace, given by the Father through the Holy Spirit. In all things it is proved that the working of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit is the same. And those whose working is one have also one substance; for things that are consubstantial (ὁμοούσια) with the same substance have the same workings, and things that are of another substance, unlike in substance (ἀνομοούσια), have discordant and different workings.
Chapter 18
18PL 23
Neque enim ex his tantum quae praemisimus, Trinitatis unitas docetur: sed ex innumerabilibus aliis, de quibus rursum secundum suum ordinem pauca ponemus. Arguens Petrus Ananiam, in eo quod in venditione agri, cujus se totum pretium obtulisse dicebat, fraudem fecisset e medio; sancti Spiritus unitatem ad Deum, non secundum numerum, sed juxta substantiam comprobavit, dicens: « Anania, quare complevit Satanas cor tuum, ut mentireris Spiritui sancto, et absconderes de pretio agri? Nonne manens tibi manebat, et venditum in tua erat potestate? Quare posuisti in corde tuo hanc rem? Non hominibus mentitus es, sed Deo. » Si enim qui Domino mentitur, mentitur Spiritui sancto; et qui Spiritui sancto mentitur, mentitur Deo: nulli dubium est, consortium Spiritus sancti esse cum Deo. Et quo modo sanctitas subsistit in Deo, eodem modo et deitas [al. divinitas] intelligitur in Spiritu sancto, Iste autem Spiritus sanctus, quem diximus ejusdem naturae esse cum Patre, etiam a Filii divinitate non differt, Salvatore dicente discipulis: « Cum in Synagogam ad principatus et potestates introduxerint vos, nolite solliciti esse, quomodo, aut quid respondeatis. Spiritus enim sanctus docebit vos in illa hora quid debeatis dicere. Ponite in cordibus vestris non praemeditari ad respondendum. Ego enim dabo vobis os et sapientiam, cui non poterunt resistere, aut contradicere. » Et in his quippe dicens, non debere eos esse sollicitos, quid respondeant contradicentibus, quia in eadem hora doceantur a Spiritu sancto quid debeant respondere: statim intulit quae sit causa fiduciae, « Ponite, » dicens, « in cordibus vestris non praemeditari ad respondendum: ego enim dabo vobis os et sapientiam, cui non poterunt resistere, aut contradicere. » Cum enim dixerit, in tempore respondendi doceri eos a Spiritu sancto quid debeant respondere, in sequentibus ait: « Ego enim dabo vobis os et sapientiam, » etc.
The unity of the Trinity is taught not only from what we have set out but from countless other passages, a few of which we shall again set down in their order. Peter, rebuking Ananias because, in selling a field whose whole price he said he had offered, he had kept back part of it by fraud, proved the unity of the Holy Spirit with God, not in number but in substance, saying: "Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart, so that you lied to the Holy Spirit and kept back part of the price of the field? While it remained, did it not remain yours, and when sold, was it not in your power? Why have you put this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God." If one who lies to the Lord lies to the Holy Spirit, and one who lies to the Holy Spirit lies to God, no one can doubt that the Holy Spirit shares with God. And just as holiness subsists in God, in the same way deity is understood in the Holy Spirit. This Holy Spirit, whom we have said to be of the same nature as the Father, also does not differ from the divinity of the Son, for the Saviour says to the disciples: "When they bring you into the synagogue before rulers and authorities, do not be anxious how or what you will answer; for the Holy Spirit will teach you in that hour what you ought to say. Settle it in your hearts not to prepare your answer beforehand; for I will give you a mouth and wisdom which they will not be able to resist or contradict." In these words, saying that they should not be anxious about what to answer their opponents, because in that same hour they would be taught by the Holy Spirit what to answer, he at once added what the ground of their confidence is: "Settle it," he says, "in your hearts not to prepare your answer beforehand; for I will give you a mouth and wisdom which they will not be able to resist or contradict." For having said that at the time of answering they would be taught by the Holy Spirit what to answer, he says in what follows: "For I will give you a mouth and wisdom," and so on.
Chapter 19
19PL 23
Ex quibus ostenditur sapientiam quae discipulis datur a Filio Spiritus sancti esse sapientiam: et doctrinam Spiritus sancti, Domini esse doctrinam: unumque naturae et voluntatis esse consortium Spiritus sancti cum Filio. Et quia superius demonstratum est socium esse per naturam Spiritum unigenito Dei, et Deo Patri: Filius vero et Pater unum sunt, juxta illud: « Ego et Pater unum sumus. » non divisa [al. indivisa] et inseparabilis, secundum naturam, ostensa est Trinitas, In alio quoque Evangelio dicitur: « Non enim vos estis qui loquimini, sed Spiritus Patris vestri qui loquitur in vobis. » Si ergo Spiritus Patris in apostolis loquitur, docens eos quae debeant respondere, et quae docentur a Spiritu sapientia est, quam non possumus aliam praeter Filium intelligere, liquido apparet ejusdem naturae Spiritum esse cum Filio, et cum Patre, cujus Spiritus est. Porro Pater et Filius unum sunt. Igitur Trinitas substantiae unitate sociatur.
From this it is shown that the wisdom given to the disciples by the Son is the wisdom of the Holy Spirit, and the teaching of the Holy Spirit is the Lord's teaching, and that the Holy Spirit shares one nature and will with the Son. And since it was shown above that the Spirit is by nature a partner of the only-begotten of God and of God the Father, and the Son and the Father are one, according to the saying "I and the Father are one", the Trinity has been shown to be undivided and inseparable by nature. In another Gospel too it is said: "For it is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you." If, then, the Spirit of the Father speaks in the apostles, teaching them what they ought to answer, and what is taught by the Spirit is wisdom, which we can understand as nothing other than the Son, it plainly appears that the Spirit is of the same nature as the Son and as the Father, whose Spirit he is. And the Father and the Son are one. Therefore the Trinity is joined in unity of substance.
Chapter 20
20PL 23
Per aliud quoque Scripturarum exemplum, Trinitatis unitas et natura, et virtus ostenditur. Filius et manus, et dextera, et brachium Patris dicitur. Sicut crebro docuimus, ex his vocabulis, unius naturae indifferentia demonstratur [al. indifferentiam demonstrari]. Spiritus etiam sanctus, digitus Dei, secundum conjunctionem naturae Patris et Filii nominatur. Siquidem in uno de Evangeliis adversus eos qui signis Domini detrahebant, dicentes: « In Beelzebub principe daemoniorum ejicit daemonia, » sciscitans Salvator ait: « Si ego in Beelzebub ejicio daemonia, filii vestri in quo ejiciunt? Si autem ego in digito Dei ejicio daemonia: ergo supervenit in vos regnum Dei. » Hunc eumdem locum, alius evangelista describens, loquentem intulit Filium: « Si autem ego in Spiritu Dei ejicio daemonia. » Ex quibus ostenditur digitum Dei esse Spiritum sanctum. Si ergo conjunctus est digitus manui, et manus ei cujus, manus est; et digitus sine dubio ad ejus substantiam refertur, cujus digitus est.
Through another example from the Scriptures too, the unity, nature and power of the Trinity are shown. The Son is called the hand, the right hand and the arm of the Father. As we have often taught, these terms show the lack of difference of one nature. The Holy Spirit is also called the finger of God, according to his union with the nature of the Father and the Son. For in one of the Gospels, against those who disparaged the Lord's signs, saying, "He casts out demons by Beelzebub, the prince of demons", the Saviour asks: "If I cast out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your sons cast them out? But if I cast out demons by the finger of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you." Another evangelist, describing this same passage, presents the Son as saying: "But if I cast out demons by the Spirit of God." From this it is shown that the finger of God is the Holy Spirit. If, then, the finger is joined to the hand, and the hand to him whose hand it is, the finger too is undoubtedly referred to the substance of him whose finger it is.
Chapter 21
21PL 23
Verum cave ne ad humilia dejectus, et oblitus sermonis, de quo nunc disputatur, depingas in animo tuo corporalium artuum diversitates; et incipias tibi magnitudines, et inaequalitates, et caetera corporum majora vel minora membra confingere; dicens digitum a manu, et manum ab eo cujus est manus, multis inaequalitatibus discrepare, quia de incorporalibus nunc Scriptura loquitur, unitatem tantum volens, non etiam mensuram substantiae demonstrare: sicut enim manus non dividitur a corpore, per quam cuncta perficit et operatur, et in eo est, cujus est manus: sic et digitus non separatur a manu, cujus est digitus. Itaque rejice inaequalitates et mensuras, cum de Deo cogitas, et intellige digiti et manus, et totius substantiae unitatem: quo digito lex in tabulis lapideis scripta est. Per aliam quoque Scripturam, fidei nostrae probationem monstrare perfacile est. Solus sapiens dictus est Deus: non accipiens ab alio sapientiam, neque per cujusdam alterius sapientiae participationem, sapiens nominatur. Siquidem multi sapientes dicuntur, non ex sua natura, sed ex communicatione sapientiae. Deus vero non alterius sapientiae participatione neque aliunde sapiens effectus, dictus est solus sapiens, et generans sapientiam, et alios faciens sapientes. Quae sapientia Dominus est noster Jesus Christus qui dicitur Dei virtus, et Dei sapientia. Spiritus quoque sanctus dicitur sapientia. Siquidem et in veteribus libris refertur, repletum esse Jesum Nave a Domino spiritu sapientiae. Sicut ergo solus sapiens Deus, non accipiens aliunde sapientiam, sed sapientes faciens et generans sapientiam: solus est sapiens, extra omnes qui per nuncupationem ejus sapientes dicuntur: « Multitudo quippe sapientium salus mundi; » et, « Qui semetipsos cognoscunt, hi sunt sapientes;·» et rursum: « Cum fueris cum sapientibus, sapiens eris: » sic et Spiritus sanctus non accipiens aliunde sapientiam, dictus est spiritus sapientiae; hoc enim ipsum quod subsistit, spiritus sapientiae est: et natura ejus, nihil est aliud nisi Spiritus veritatis et Spiritus Dei, de quibus jam abundanter in Sectarum volumine disputavimus. Unde ne eadem superflue replicemus, contenti simus disputatione praeterita.
But beware lest, cast down to low things and forgetting the subject now under discussion, you paint in your mind the differences of bodily limbs and begin to imagine for yourself sizes and inequalities and the other larger or smaller members of bodies, saying that the finger differs from the hand, and the hand from him whose hand it is, by many inequalities; for Scripture is now speaking of incorporeal things, wishing to show only the unity of substance, not its measure. For as the hand through which one does and works everything is not divided from the body, and is in him whose hand it is, so the finger is not separated from the hand whose finger it is. So when you think of God, reject inequalities and measures, and understand the unity of the finger and the hand and the whole substance: the finger by which the law was written on tablets of stone. Through another Scripture too it is very easy to show the proof of our faith. God alone is called wise: not receiving wisdom from another, nor called wise through participation in some other wisdom. For many are called wise, not by their own nature but by sharing in wisdom. But God, not made wise by sharing in another's wisdom or from elsewhere, is called the only wise, begetting wisdom and making others wise. This wisdom is our Lord Jesus Christ, who is called the power of God and the wisdom of God. The Holy Spirit too is called wisdom: for in the ancient books it is reported that Joshua son of Nun was filled by the Lord with the spirit of wisdom. As, then, God alone is wise, not receiving wisdom from elsewhere but making others wise and begetting wisdom, he alone is wise, apart from all who are called wise by sharing his name ("The multitude of the wise is the salvation of the world"; and "Those who know themselves are wise"; and again "When you are with the wise, you will be wise"); so too the Holy Spirit, not receiving wisdom from elsewhere, is called the spirit of wisdom; for his very subsistence is the spirit of wisdom, and his nature is nothing other than the Spirit of truth and the Spirit of God, on which we have already argued at length in our book On the Sects. So, not to repeat the same things needlessly, let us be content with that earlier discussion.
Chapter 22
22PL 23
Quia igitur Spiritus sapientiae et veritatis inseparabiliter cum Filio est, ipse quoque sapientia subsistit et veritas. Si enim capax esset sapientiae et veritatis, in id aliquando descenderet, ut desineret habere quod aliunde susceperat, id est [veri]tas ipse subsistens, non separatur a Patre, qui solus sapiens et veritas, Scripturarum vocibus praedicatur. Eumdem circulum unitatis atque substantiae Spiritus sancti [leg. Spiritum sanctum], secundum id quod sapientiae et veritatis est spiritus, videmus habere cum Filio, et rursum Filium a Patris non discrepare substantia. Cum autem Filius imago sit Dei invisibilis, et forma substantiae ejus, quicunque ad hanc imaginem, vel formam imaginantur, atque formantur, adducuntur in similitudinem Dei: juxta vires tamen humani profectus, istiusmodi formam et imaginem consequentes. Similiter et Spiritus sanctus cum sit signaculum Dei, hi qui formam et imaginem Dei capiunt, signati per eum, in eo ducuntur ad signaculum Christi sapientiae et scientiae, insuper fide pleni. « Nam divisiones operationum sunt, idem autem ipse Spiritus qui operatur omnia in omnibus. « Operante ergo Patre multiplicem charismatum plenitudinem, multiplicat eam Filius subsistentem per Spiritum sanctum. « Alii enim per Spiritum datur sermo sapientiae. Alii vero scientiae, secundum eumdem spiritum. Alii fides in eodem spiritu, » et caetera quae ab Apostolo enumerata sunt dona, quibus additur: « Haec autem omnia operatur unus atque idem Spiritus: dividens singulis prout vult. »
Since, then, the Spirit of wisdom and truth is inseparably with the Son, he too subsists as wisdom and truth. For if he were a receiver of wisdom and truth, he might at some time sink so low as to cease to have what he had received from elsewhere; but, subsisting himself as wisdom and truth, he is not separated from the Father, who alone is proclaimed by the words of the Scriptures as wise and as truth. We see that the Holy Spirit, inasmuch as he is the spirit of wisdom and truth, has the same circle of unity and substance with the Son, and again that the Son does not differ from the substance of the Father. Since the Son is the image of the invisible God and the form of his substance, all who are shaped and formed according to this image or form are brought into the likeness of God, attaining such a form and image according to the strength of human progress. Likewise, since the Holy Spirit is the seal of God, those who receive the form and image of God, sealed by him, are led in him to the seal of Christ, full of wisdom and knowledge, and of faith besides. "For there are distributions of workings, but it is the same Spirit who works all in all." So while the Father works the manifold fullness of gifts, the Son multiplies it as it subsists through the Holy Spirit. "For to one is given through the Spirit the word of wisdom, to another the word of knowledge according to the same Spirit, to another faith in the same Spirit," and the other gifts listed by the Apostle, to which is added: "All these are worked by one and the same Spirit, distributing to each as he wills."
Chapter 23
23PL 23
Unde dicentes operatricem, et ut ita dicam, distributricem naturam Spiritus sancti, non abducamur ab his qui dicunt operationem, et non substantiam Dei esse Spiritum sanctum. Et ex aliis quoque plurimis locis subsistens natura demonstratur Spiritus sancti; ut in illo quod apostoli scribunt: « Visum est enim Spiritui sancto et nobis,» quia hoc quod dicitur, « visum est, » non operationem significat, sed naturam: maxime cum et de Domino simile quid reperiatur, ut: « Sicut Domino visum est, ita factum est. » Denique et sermones ejus saepissime lectitantur, ut in illo: « Jejunantibus eis et ministrantibus, » id est, discipulis Christi, « dixit Spiritus sanctus: Separate mihi Barnabam et Saulem, in opus ad quod vocavi eos. » Quae vox divinitatis et auctoritatis index, non creatam, sed increatam substantiam monstrat. Neque enim Spiritus sanctus in aliud quoddam opus vocavit Barnabam et Paulum, quod non sit Patris et Filii, cum ministerium, quod eis commisit et tradidit Spiritus, Patris et Filii sit ministerium. Ad Galatas Paulus loquitur: « Qui enim operatus est Petro in apostolatum circumcisionis, operatus est et mihi in gentes, et Barnabae. » Pariter enim ad nationes Spiritus sancti auctoritate directi sunt. Christo quoque operante in apostolis. Spiritus completum est ministerium, ut ipsi apostoli confitentur se in Christo loqui, et id quod suis oculis viderunt, et ministri facti sunt sermonis, id est, Christi; et dispensatores mysteriorum Dei. Denique quasi principatum in sacerdotio possidentes, et initiatores fidei a Christo sunt demonstrati, dicente: «Euntes ite, et docete omnes gentes, baptizantes eos in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti. » Et sicut Apostolus scribit rectissime: « Unus est Dominus, una fides, unum baptisma. » Quis non ex ipsa cogetur veritate suscipere indifferentiam sanctae Trinitatis, dum una sit fides in Patre, et Filio et Spiritu sancto; et lavacrum detur atque firmetur in nomine Patris, et Filii et Spiritus sancti?
So when we speak of the working and, so to say, distributing nature of the Holy Spirit, let us not be led away by those who say that the Holy Spirit is an activity of God and not a substance. From very many other places too the subsisting nature of the Holy Spirit is shown, as in what the apostles write: "For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us"; for the phrase "it seemed good" signifies not an activity but a nature, especially since something similar is found of the Lord: "As it seemed good to the Lord, so it was done." Again, his words are very often read, as in this: "While they were fasting and ministering," that is, the disciples of Christ, "the Holy Spirit said: Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them." This voice, a sign of divinity and authority, shows a substance not created but uncreated. For the Holy Spirit did not call Barnabas and Paul to some other work that is not the Father's and the Son's, since the ministry which the Spirit entrusted and handed over to them is the ministry of the Father and the Son. Paul says to the Galatians: "For he who worked in Peter for the apostleship of the circumcision worked also in me for the Gentiles," and in Barnabas. For they were sent together to the nations by the authority of the Holy Spirit. And with Christ also working in the apostles, the ministry of the Spirit was fulfilled, so that the apostles themselves confess that they speak in Christ and what they saw with their own eyes, and that they became ministers of the Word, that is, of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of God. And so, as possessing a primacy in the priesthood, they were appointed by Christ as initiators into the faith, when he said: "Go, teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." And as the Apostle writes most rightly: "One Lord, one faith, one baptism." Who will not be compelled by the truth itself to accept the lack of difference of the holy Trinity, since there is one faith in the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, and the washing is given and confirmed in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit?
Chapter 24
24PL 23
Non arbitror quemquam tam vecordem atque insanum futurum, ut perfectum baptisma putet id quod datur in nomine Patris et Filii, sine assumptione Spiritus sancti; aut rursus in nomine Patris et Spiritus sancti, Filii vocabulo praetermisso: aut certe in nomine Filii et Spiritus sancti, non praeposito vocabulo Patris. Licet enim quis possit exsistere saxei (ut ita dicam) cordis, et penitus mentis alienae, qui ita baptizare conetur, ut unum de praeceptis nominibus praetermittat, videlicet contrarius legislator Christi; tamen sine perfectione baptizabit, imo penitus a peccatis liberare non poterit, quos a se baptizatos existimaverit. Ex his colligitur, quam indivisa sit substantia Trinitatis, et Patrem vere Filii esse Patrem, et Filium vere Patris Filium, et Spiritum sanctum vere Patris et Dei esse Spiritum; et insuper sapientiae et veritatis, id est, Filii Dei. Haec est salus ergo credentium, et dispensatio ecclesiasticae disciplinae in hac Trinitate perficitur. Nam cum Salvator discipulos suos ad praedicandum Evangelium miserit, et ad dogmata veritatis docenda Pater in Ecclesia constituisse dicatur, primo apostolos, secundo prophetas, tertio magistros, super hac re etiam Apostoli congruente sententia: « Et sicut probati sumus a Deo ad credendum Evangelium, sic loquimur: non ut hominibus placentes, sed Deo qui probavit corda nostra: » hos eosdem quos Christus magistros esse praecepit, et Pater probavit, et Spiritus sanctus dispensatores et propositos in Ecclesia constituisse perhibetur [al. veraciter prohibetur]. Siquidem cum Miletum Paulus apostolus presbyteros de diversis locis et plurimis Ecclesiis congregasset: « Attendite, » inquit, « vobis et universo gregi, super quos Spiritus sanctus posuit vos episcopos ad regendam Ecclesiam Domini quam acquisivit per sanguinem suum. » Si enim quos Christus ad evangelizandum et baptizandas nationes misit, Spiritus sanctus Ecclesiae praeposuit, Patris sententia destinatos; nulli dubium est, unam Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti operationem et probationem, et consequenter eamdem Trinitatis esse substantiam. Necnon et illud considerandum, quod in corde et sensu habitare non potest creatura, nisi Deus et sermo ejus in Spiritu sancto, sicut ad quosdam loquitur Pater: « Inhabitabo in eis, et inambulabo. » Et ad ipsum quidam dirigit vocem, « Tu autem in sancto habitas, laus Israel. » Altus quippe in altis habitat universae conditor creaturae. Habitat vero et unigenitus Filius in mente pura, et corde credentium. Per fidem quippe habitare Christum, in interiori homine, in Spiritu ait Apostolus, ita scribens: « In Spiritu, in interiori homine habitare Christum per fidem in cordibus vestris. » Ipse quoque de se loquitur: «Vivit in me Christus; » et iterum: « Qui in me loquitur Christus *·; » et Salvator: « Veniemus,» inquit, « ego et Pater, » haud dubium, quin ad eum qui praecepta ejus servaverit, « et mansionem apud eum faciemus. » Porro sic sermo iste contexitur: « Si quis diligit me, sermonem meum servabit. Et Pater meus diliget eum, et ad eum veniemus, et mansionem apud eum faciemus.» In alio quoque loco, omnis natura rationalium creaturarum, domus dicitur Salvatoris.
I do not think anyone will be so senseless and mad as to think that baptism given in the name of the Father and the Son without the inclusion of the Holy Spirit is complete; or again in the name of the Father and the Holy Spirit, with the name of the Son left out; or in the name of the Son and the Holy Spirit, without putting first the name of the Father. For though someone may exist with a heart of stone, so to speak, and a mind wholly estranged, who tries to baptize so as to leave out one of the prescribed names, a lawgiver contrary to Christ, he will nevertheless baptize without completeness; indeed, he will be wholly unable to free from sins those whom he thinks he has baptized. From this it is gathered how undivided the substance of the Trinity is: that the Father is truly the Father of the Son, the Son truly the Son of the Father, and the Holy Spirit truly the Spirit of the Father and of God, and moreover of wisdom and truth, that is, of the Son of God. This, then, is the salvation of believers, and the ordering of the church's discipline is completed in this Trinity. For the Saviour sent his disciples to preach the Gospel, and the Father is said to have appointed in the church, for teaching the doctrines of truth, first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, the Apostle's statement on this matter agreeing: "And as we have been approved by God to be entrusted with the Gospel, so we speak, not as pleasing men, but God, who has approved our hearts." These same men, whom Christ commanded to be teachers and the Father approved, the Holy Spirit is also said to have appointed stewards and overseers in the church. For when the apostle Paul had gathered at Miletus presbyters from various places and very many churches, he said: "Take heed to yourselves and to the whole flock, over which the Holy Spirit has placed you as bishops, to rule the church of the Lord, which he acquired with his own blood." If, then, those whom Christ sent to evangelize and baptize the nations, the Holy Spirit set over the church, appointed by the Father's decision, no one can doubt that there is one working and approval of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, and consequently the same substance of the Trinity. We must also consider this: that a creature cannot dwell in the heart and the mind, but only God and his Word in the Holy Spirit, as the Father says of certain people: "I will dwell in them and walk among them." And someone addresses him: "But you dwell in the holy place, the praise of Israel." For the maker of all creation dwells on high among the highest. And the only-begotten Son dwells in the pure mind and the heart of believers. For the Apostle says that Christ dwells by faith in the inner man, in the Spirit, writing: "That Christ may dwell by faith in your hearts, in the Spirit, in the inner man." He also says of himself: "Christ lives in me"; and again: "Christ who speaks in me"; and the Saviour says: "We will come, I and the Father," no doubt to him who keeps his commands, "and make our dwelling with him." The passage runs thus: "If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our dwelling with him." In another place too the whole nature of rational creatures is called the Saviour's house.
Chapter 25
25PL 23
Sicut autem super domum suam Dominus Jesus, cujus domus sumus nos: ita domus Christi templum Dei est, in quo Spiritus ejusdem inhabitat Dei. Scribens quippe Corinthiis Paulus ait: « Nescitis quia templum Dei estis; et Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis? » Si autem in domo et templo, quo Pater et Salvator inhabitat, illico invenitur et Spiritus sanctus, ex hoc indivisa Trinitatis substantia demonstratur. Et post non multa ejusdem Epistolae: « Noscitis, »inquit, « quia corpora vestra templum Spiritus sancti sunt, quem habetis a Deo? » Cum ergo Spiritus sanctus, similiter ut Pater et Filius, mentem et interiorem hominem inhabitare doceatur, non dicam ineptum, sed impium est eum dicere creaturam. Disciplinas quippe, virtutes dico et artes, et his contrarias perturbationes, et imperitias, et affectus in animabus habitare possibile est; non tamen ut substantivas, sed ut accidentes. Creatam vero naturam in sensu habitare impossibile est. Quod si verum est, et Spiritus sanctus absque ulla ambiguitate subsistens, animae est habitator et cordis: nulli dubium est, quin cum Patre et Filio credi debeat increatus. Ex omnibus igitur quae procedens sermo disserit, incorruptibilis et sempiternus secundum naturam Patris, et Filii, Spiritus sanctus demonstratus, universam de se ambiguitatem abstulit et suspicionem, ne unus de creatis substantiis existimetur. Sed et ambigi nequit, quin is Spiritus Dei sit, quem exire de Patre Salvatoris in Evangelio verba declarant. « Cum venerit, » inquit, « Consolator, quem ego mittam vobis, Spiritum veritatis, qui a Patre egreditur, ipse testimonium dabit de me. » Consolatorem autem venientem Spiritum sanctum dicit, ab operatione ei nomen imponens: quia non solum consolatur eos quos se digno· repererit, et ab omni tristitia et perturbatione reddit alienos: verum incredibile quoddam gaudium et hilaritatem eis tribuit, in tantum, ut possit quis Deo gratias referens, quod tali hospite dignus habeatur, dicere: « Dedisti laetitiam in corde meo.» Sempiterna quippe laetitia in eorum corde versatur, quorum Spiritus sanctus habitator est. Iste Spiritus sanctus consolator a Filio mittitur, non secundum angelorum, aut prophetarum, aut apostolorum ministerium, sed ut mitti decet a sapientia et veritate Spiritum Dei, indivisam habentem cum eadem sapientia et veritate naturam. Etenim Filius missus a Patre non separatur, nec disjungitur ab eo, manens et habens illum in semetipso. Quin Spiritus veritatis supradicto modo missus a Filio de Patre egreditur, non aliunde ad alia transmigrans. Impossibile quippe hoc pariter et blasphemum est. Si enim de loco ad locum egreditur Spiritus, et ipse Pater in loco invenietur, et Spiritus veritatis juxta naturam corporum certo spatio circumscriptus, alium deserens locum, ad alium commigrabit. Sed quo modo Pater non consistens in loco, ultra omnem corporum est naturam, ita et Spiritus veritatis nequaquam locorum fine clauditur, cum sit incorporalis: et ut verius dicam, excellens universam rationalem creaturam·
As the Lord Jesus is over his own house, whose house we are, so the house of Christ is the temple of God, in which the Spirit of the same God dwells. Writing to the Corinthians, Paul says: "Do you not know that you are the temple of God, and the Spirit of God dwells in you?" If, in the house and temple in which the Father and the Saviour dwell, the Holy Spirit is at once found too, the undivided substance of the Trinity is shown. And not long after in the same epistle he says: "Do you know that your bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit, whom you have from God?" Since, then, the Holy Spirit is taught to dwell in the mind and the inner man in the same way as the Father and the Son, it is, I will not say foolish, but impious to call him a creature. For disciplines (I mean virtues and arts) and their opposites, disturbances and ignorance, and feelings can dwell in souls, not as substances but as accidents. But it is impossible for a created nature to dwell in the mind. If this is true, and the Holy Spirit, subsisting beyond any doubt, is an indweller of soul and heart, no one can doubt that he must be believed uncreated with the Father and the Son. From everything, then, that the argument has set out as it proceeds, the Holy Spirit has been shown to be incorruptible and everlasting according to the nature of the Father and the Son, and has removed all doubt and suspicion about himself, lest he be thought one of the created substances. Nor can it be doubted that he is the Spirit of God, whom the Saviour's words in the Gospel declare to go forth from the Father: "When the Comforter comes," he says, "whom I will send you, the Spirit of truth who goes forth from the Father, he will bear witness to me." He calls the coming Holy Spirit the Comforter, giving him a name from his activity, because he not only comforts those he finds worthy of himself and makes them strangers to all sadness and disturbance, but gives them an unbelievable joy and gladness, so much that one may thank God for being held worthy of such a guest and say: "You have put gladness in my heart." For everlasting gladness lives in the hearts of those in whom the Holy Spirit dwells. This Holy Spirit, the Comforter, is sent by the Son, not as in the ministry of angels or prophets or apostles, but as the Spirit of God should be sent by wisdom and truth, having an undivided nature with that same wisdom and truth. For the Son, sent by the Father, is not separated or disjoined from him, remaining in him and having him in himself. Moreover, the Spirit of truth, sent by the Son in the way described, goes forth from the Father, not passing from one place to another. That is both impossible and blasphemous. For if the Spirit went forth from place to place, the Father himself would be found in a place, and the Spirit of truth, circumscribed in a certain space like bodies, would leave one place and move to another. But as the Father, not existing in a place, is beyond all the nature of bodies, so the Spirit of truth is in no way enclosed by the limits of places, since he is incorporeal and, to speak more truly, surpasses all rational creation.
Chapter 26
26PL 23
Quia ergo impossibile est, et impium, ista quae diximus de incorporalibus credere: exire de Patre Spiritum sanctum sic intelligendum, ut se Salvator de Deo exisse testatur, dicens, « Ego de Deo exivi et veni. » Et sicut loca et commutationes locorum ab incorporalibus separamus, sic et prolationes intus dico et foris ab intellectualium natura discernimus, quia istae corporum sunt recipientium factum, et habentium vastitates. Ineffabili itaque et sola fide noto sermone credendum est, Salvatorem dictum esse exisse a Deo, et Spiritum veritatis a Patre egredi, loquente Spiritu qui a me egreditur. Cum enim dicere posset de Deo, sive de Domino, sive de Omnipotente, nihil horum tetigit: sed ait, de Patre, non quod Pater a Deo omnipotente sit alius: quia hoc scelus est etiam cogitare; sed secundum proprietatem et intellectum Parentis egredi ab eo dicitur Spiritus veritatis. Licet enim ex Deo frequenter se dicat exisse Salvator, proprietatem tamen, et ut ita dicam, familiaritatem, de qua jam saepe tractavimus, ex vocabulo magis sibi Patris assumit, dicens: « Ego in Patre, et Pater in me; » et alibi: « Ego et Pater unum sumus: » et multa alia his similia, quae in Evangelio observans lector inveniet. Iste ergo Spiritus sanctus qui de Patre egreditur, testificabitur, inquit Dominus, de me, testimonium simile ferens ei Patris testimonio, de quo ait: « Testimonium dicit de me, qui misit me Pater. » Mittente autem Filio Spiritum veritatis, quem Consolatorem vocavit, simul mittit et Pater. Neque enim Pater mittente Filio non mittit, cum eadem voluntate Patris et Filii Spiritus veniat. Salvatore quoque per prophetam loquente: sicut manifestum esse poterit ei, qui totum perlegerit locum. « Et Dominus misit me, et Spiritum suum: » siquidem non solum Filium, sed et Spiritum mittit Deus. Sed et apostolus loquitur: « Quae nunc annuntiata sunt vobis per eos qui evangelizaverunt vobis, Spiritu sancto misso de coelis. » Et in libro qui Sapientia inscribitur, ab his qui divina charismata consecuti sunt, vox gratias Deo perferens destinatur. « Quae autem in coelis sint, quis investigavit? voluntatem autem tuam quis cognovit: nisi quod tu dedisti sapientiam, et Spiritum sanctum tuum misisti de excelsis? Et sic correctae sunt semitae eorum, qui super terram erant: et placita tibi edocti sunt homines. » Et in praesenti siquidem lectione, non sola sapientia Dei, id est, unigenitus Filius ejus datur a Patre, sed et Spiritus sanctus mittitur·
Since, then, it is impossible and impious to believe what we have described of incorporeal beings, the Holy Spirit's going forth from the Father is to be understood as the Saviour testifies that he himself went forth from God, saying: "I went forth from God and have come." And as we separate places and changes of place from incorporeal beings, so we also distinguish from the nature of intellectual beings utterances, I mean inward and outward ones, because these belong to bodies that receive making and have extension. So we must believe, by an ineffable word known only by faith, that the Saviour is said to have gone forth from God and the Spirit of truth to go forth from the Father, as the Spirit says, "who goes forth from me". For though he could have said "from God", or "from the Lord", or "from the Almighty", he touched none of these, but said "from the Father": not that the Father is other than God Almighty, for it is a crime even to think that, but the Spirit of truth is said to go forth from him according to the particular character and conception of the Parent. For although the Saviour often says that he went forth from God, he takes for himself rather from the name "Father" the particular character and, so to say, the intimacy we have often discussed, saying: "I am in the Father and the Father in me"; and elsewhere: "I and the Father are one"; and many other similar sayings that the attentive reader will find in the Gospel. This Holy Spirit, then, who goes forth from the Father, will bear witness, says the Lord, to me, bearing a testimony like that of the Father, of which he says: "The Father who sent me bears witness to me." When the Son sends the Spirit of truth, whom he called the Comforter, the Father sends him at the same time. For the Father does not fail to send when the Son sends, since the Spirit comes by the same will of the Father and the Son. The Saviour too speaks through the prophet, as will be plain to one who reads the whole passage: "And the Lord has sent me, and his Spirit"; for God sends not only the Son but also the Spirit. The apostle also says: "The things now announced to you by those who preached the Gospel to you by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven." And in the book entitled Wisdom, a voice giving thanks to God is uttered by those who have obtained the divine gifts: "Who has traced out what is in heaven? Who has known your will, unless you gave wisdom and sent your Holy Spirit from on high? And so the paths of those on earth were set right, and men were taught what pleases you." And in the present reading not only is the wisdom of God, that is, his only-begotten Son, given by the Father, but the Holy Spirit too is sent.
Chapter 27
27PL 23
In ipso quoque Evangelio dari praedicatur a Patre, et mitti Spiritus sanctus, Salvatore dicente: « Et ego rogabo Patrem meum, et alium Paracletum dabit vobis, ut sit vobiscum in aeternum, Spiritum veritatis; » et iterum: « Paracletus autem Spiritus sanctus, quem mittet Pater in nomine meo, ille vos docebit omnia. » Nam et in his sermonibus, alium paracletum dare dicitur Pater, non autem alium ab (mss. absque) eo, qui a Filio mittitur, secundum illud: « Cum autem venerit ille Paracletus, quem mittam vobis a Patre, Spiritum veritatis. » Quem alium paracletum nominavit, non juxta naturae differentiam, sed operationis diversitatem. Cum enim Salvator mediatoris et legati personam habeat, et qua pontifex deprecetur pro peccatis nostris, salvans in sempiternum eos, qui per ipsum accesserunt ad Deum, quia semper vivens interpellat pro eis [ms. nobis] Patrem; Spiritus sanctus secundum aliam significantiam paracletus, ab eo quod consolatur in tristitia positos, nuncupatus est. Verum noli ex Filii et Spiritus sancti operatione diversa, varias aestimare naturas. Siquidem in alio loco reperitur paracletus Spiritus, legati ad Patrem persona fungi, ut in illo: « Quid enim oremus juxta id quod oportet, nescimus, sed ipse Spiritus interpellat pro nobis gemitibus inenarrabilibus. Qui autem scrutatur corda, scit quid desideret Spiritus, quomodo [al. cum] secundum Deum postulat pro sanctis. »
In the Gospel itself too it is proclaimed that the Holy Spirit is given and sent by the Father, as the Saviour says: "And I will ask my Father, and he will give you another Paraclete, to be with you for ever, the Spirit of truth"; and again: "But the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things." In these sayings the Father is said to give another Paraclete, but not another than the one who is sent by the Son, according to the saying: "But when that Paraclete comes, whom I will send you from the Father, the Spirit of truth." He named him another Paraclete not because of a difference of nature but because of a diversity of activity. For since the Saviour holds the role of mediator and envoy, and as high priest makes supplication for our sins, saving for ever those who have come to God through him, since he always lives to intercede for them with the Father, the Holy Spirit has been named Paraclete in another sense, because he comforts those who are in sadness. But do not, from the different activities of the Son and the Holy Spirit, suppose that their natures differ. For in another place the Spirit, the Paraclete, is found acting as an envoy to the Father, as in this: "For we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with unutterable groanings. And he who searches hearts knows what the Spirit desires, because he asks for the saints according to God."
Chapter 28
28PL 23
Salvator quoque consolationem a qua Spiritus sanctus paracletus nuncupatus est, operatur in cordibus eorum qui ea indigent. Scriptum est enim: « Et humiles populi consolatus est. » Unde et his qui hoc beneficium fuerat consecutus, eum praedicans, loquebatur: « Domine, secundum multitudinem dolorum meorum in corde meo, consolationes tuae laetificaverunt cor meum; » sive, « dilexerunt animam meam: » utroque enim scriptum esse modo in diversis exemplaribus invenitur. Sed et Pater, Deus omnis consolationis dicitur: consolans eos qui in tribulatione sunt, ut ex ipsis angustiis per patientiam salutem primum, dehinc coronam gloriae consequantur. Spiritus igitur consolator et sanctus, et Spiritus veritatis datur a Patre, ut semper cum Christi discipulis commoretur, cum quibus et ipse Salvator est, dicens: « Ecce enim vobiscum sum usque ad consummationem saeculi. » Cum autem semper apostolis et Spiritus sanctus adsit [al. assistat] et Filius, sequitur, ut et Pater cum ipsis sit, quia qui recipit Filium, recipit et Patrem: et mansionem Filius cum Patre facit apud eos, qui digni adventu ejus exstiterint. Sed et ubi Spiritus sanctus fuerit, statim invenitur et Filius. Siquidem cum in prophetis Spiritus sanctus sit, faciens eos futura praecinere, et alia quae prophetalis operationis sunt, sermo Dei ad eos dicitur factus, ut ad id quod ad consuetudinem prophetarum est, « Haec dicit Dominus, » etiam illud addatur, « Sermo qui factus est ad Isaiam, » sive ad reliquos.
The Saviour too works the comfort from which the Holy Spirit is named Paraclete in the hearts of those who need it. For it is written: "And he comforted the lowly of the people." That is why one who had obtained this benefit spoke in his praise: "Lord, according to the multitude of the sorrows in my heart, your comforts have gladdened my heart" (or "have loved my soul": it is found written both ways in different copies). The Father too is called the God of all comfort, comforting those who are in tribulation, so that out of their very distress they may obtain through patience first salvation and then the crown of glory. The Spirit, then, the Comforter and holy, the Spirit of truth, is given by the Father to remain always with Christ's disciples, with whom the Saviour himself also is, saying: "For behold, I am with you to the end of the age." And since both the Holy Spirit and the Son are always present to the apostles, it follows that the Father too is with them, since one who receives the Son receives the Father also, and the Son with the Father makes his dwelling with those who have proved worthy of his coming. And where the Holy Spirit is, the Son too is at once found. For since the Holy Spirit is in the prophets, making them foretell the future and do the other things that belong to prophetic activity, the word of God is said to have come to them, so that to the customary formula of the prophets, "Thus says the Lord", is added also "The word that came to Isaiah", or to the others.
Chapter 29
29PL 23
Quod autem prophetae Spiritum sanctum habuerint, Deo manifeste loquente cognoscimus. Ait enim: « Quaecunque mandavi in Spiritu meo servis meis prophetis. » Et Salvator in Evangelio significat justos viros, et eos qui ante adventum suum populo ventura cecinerant [Vat. praecinerant]. Spiritus sancti aspiratione completos. Interrogans quippe Pharisaeos quid eis de Christo videretur, et audiens quia esset filius David, loquitur: « Quomodo David in Spiritu vocat eum Dominum » dicens: « Dixit Dominus Domino meo: Sede a dextris meis? Si ergo David vocat eum in Spiritu sancto Dominum, quomodo Filius ejus est. » Et Petrus ad consortes fidei loquitur: « Oportebat impleri Scripturam, quam praedixit Spiritus sanctus per os David de Juda, etc.; » et in eodem rursus libro: « Qui per Spiritum,» inquit, « sanctum ore David pueri tui locutus es: Quare fremuerunt gentes, et populi meditati sunt inania? » Isaias quoque cum sermone Dei impulsus ad prophetandum fuisset Spiritus sancti imperio prophetasse perhibetur: ut in fine eorumdem Actuum scribitur. « Bene Spiritus sanctus locutus est per Isaiam prophetam ad patres vestros,» dicens: « Vade ad populum istum, et dic Aure audietis, » et reliqua, Hanc igitur prophetiam quam apostolus Paulus affirmat a Spiritu sancto pronuntiatam, ipse liber prophetae a Domino dictam esse commemorat. « Et audivi,» inquit Isaias, « vocem Domini, dicentem · Quem mittam, et quis ibit ad populum istum? Et dixi: Ecce ego, mitte me. Vade, » inquit, « et dic populo huic: Aure audietis, » et post alia ipse Dominus ait: « Et convertentur, et sanabo illos. » Et statim propheta: « Quousque, Domine?» cum enim Dominus ad prophetam dixisset, ut ea quae scripta sunt, diceret, et propheta jubenti Domino respondisset: « Usquequo, Domine?» ea quae in propheta a Domino dicta sunt, in Spiritu sancto commemorata Paulus affirmat. Ex quo liquido ostenditur, ut saepe jam diximus, unam et voluntatem et naturam Domini esse, et Spiritus sancti, et in nuncupatione Spiritus etiam nomen Domini intelligi. Quo modo enim ad Corinthios vocabulum Dei super Patre positum, et Domini super Filio, neque Patri aufert dominationem, neque Filio deitatem: siquidem eadem ratione qua Pater Dominus est: et Filius Deus est: sic et Spiritus sanctus Dominus nuncupatur. Si autem Dominus, consequenter et Deus, ut paulo ante jam diximus, cum vocem apostoli Petri ad Ananiam, qui pecuniam subtraxerat, poneremus, quia et deitas [al. divinitas] superintelligitur in Spiritu sancto.
That the prophets had the Holy Spirit we know from God's own plain words. For he says: "Whatever I commanded by my Spirit to my servants the prophets." And the Saviour in the Gospel indicates that righteous men, and those who before his coming sang to the people of things to come, were filled with the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. For when he asked the Pharisees what they thought of Christ, and heard that he was the son of David, he said: "How does David in the Spirit call him Lord, saying, The Lord said to my Lord, Sit at my right hand? If, then, David in the Holy Spirit calls him Lord, how is he his son?" And Peter says to those who shared his faith: "The Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke beforehand through the mouth of David concerning Judas," and so on; and again in the same book: "You who through the Holy Spirit spoke by the mouth of David your servant: Why did the nations rage, and the peoples meditate vain things?" Isaiah too, when he had been moved to prophesy by the word of God, is said to have prophesied by the command of the Holy Spirit, as is written at the end of the same Acts: "The Holy Spirit spoke well through Isaiah the prophet to your fathers, saying: Go to this people and say, You will hear with your ears," and the rest. This prophecy, which the apostle Paul affirms was uttered by the Holy Spirit, the prophet's book itself records was spoken by the Lord: "And I heard," says Isaiah, "the voice of the Lord saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go to this people? And I said: Here I am, send me. Go," he says, "and say to this people: You will hear with your ears," and after other things the Lord himself says: "And they will turn, and I will heal them." And at once the prophet: "How long, O Lord?" For when the Lord had told the prophet to say what is written, and the prophet had answered the Lord's command, "How long, O Lord?", Paul affirms that what was said by the Lord in the prophet was spoken in the Holy Spirit. From this it is clearly shown, as we have often said already, that the will and nature of the Lord and of the Holy Spirit are one, and that in the name "Spirit" the name "Lord" is also understood. For as, in the epistle to the Corinthians, the term "God" applied to the Father and "Lord" applied to the Son neither takes lordship from the Father nor deity from the Son (for by the same reason by which the Father is Lord, the Son is also God), so the Holy Spirit too is called Lord. And if Lord, then also God, as we said a little earlier when we set out the apostle Peter's words to Ananias, who had kept back the money, because deity too is understood in the Holy Spirit.
Chapter 30
30PL 23
Verum quoniam inde quaestionis ordo deductus est: « Cum autem venerit paracletus Spiritus sanctus, quem mittet Pater in nomine meo, ille vos docebit omnia: » age nunc ex ipso sermone quaeramus, si quid in eo possimus invenire cum his consentire quae dicta sunt. Spiritum sanctum a Patre in suo mitti nomine, Salvator affirmat, cum proprie Salvatoris nomen sit Filius, si quidem naturae consortium, et, ut ita dicam, proprietas personarum, ex ista voce signatur. In qua appellatione Filii, missus a Patre Spiritus sanctus, non servus, non alius, nec disjunctus a Filio intelligatur [al. intelligitur]. Et quo modo Filius in Patris appellatione venit, dicens: « Ego veni in nomine Patris mei: » Filii quippe tantummodo est in nomine Patris venire, salva proprietate Filii ad Patrem, et Patris ad Filium: sic e contrario, nullus alius venit in nomine Patris, sed verbi gratia, in Domini, et Dei, et Omnipotentis. Quod manifestum advertere poteris prophetas relegens ex animo. Nam et Moyses magnus Dei minister et famulus. in nomine ejus, qui est: et in nomine Dei Abraham et Isaac, et Jacob venit, Deo ad eum loquente: « Sic dices filiis Israel: Qui est, misit me ad vos » et rursus: « Dices eis: Deus Abraham, Isaac, et Jacob misit me ad vos. » Servorum quippe justorum quales erant de quibus dixit: « Mandabo in Spiritu meo servis meis prophetis, » in nomine Dei facta est missio. Et quia [fort. qui] dignos se exhibuerunt Deo, in nomine Dei venisse referuntur: rursus proficientes in majus, et sub unius Dei imperio considentes, in omnipotentis Dei nuncupatione venerunt. Quia vero filii Israel in AEgypto commorantes, didicerunt eos, qui non sunt, quasi deos colere, et mundi patres divino honore venerari, consequens fuit, ut Moyses sub ejus, « Qui est,» vocabulo ad eos mitteretur, et a falsis eos liberans diis, ad veram transduceret deitatem, et ad Dominum patrum Abraham, Isaac, et Jacob.
But since the order of the inquiry began from this point, "But when the Paraclete comes, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things", come now, let us inquire from the saying itself whether we can find anything in it that agrees with what has been said. The Saviour affirms that the Holy Spirit is sent by the Father in his name, and the Saviour's proper name is "Son", since this word marks a sharing of nature and, so to speak, the particular character of the persons. In this name of the Son, the Holy Spirit sent by the Father is to be understood as not a servant, not other than the Son, and not disjoined from him. And as the Son comes in the name of the Father, saying, "I have come in my Father's name" (for it belongs only to the Son to come in the name of the Father, preserving the Son's relation to the Father and the Father's to the Son), so, on the other hand, no one else comes in the name of the Father, but, for example, in the name of the Lord, of God, of the Almighty. You will be able to see this plainly if you reread the prophets attentively. For Moses too, the great minister and servant of God, came in the name of him who is, and in the name of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, God saying to him: "Thus you shall say to the sons of Israel: He who is has sent me to you"; and again: "You shall say to them: The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob has sent me to you." For the sending of righteous servants, such as those of whom he said, "I will command by my Spirit my servants the prophets", was made in the name of God. And since they showed themselves worthy of God, they are said to have come in the name of God; again, advancing further and settled under the rule of the one God, they came in the name of God Almighty. But since the sons of Israel living in Egypt had learned to worship as gods those who are not, and to venerate the elements of the world with divine honour, it followed that Moses was sent to them under the name of "He who is", so that he might free them from false gods and lead them over to the true deity and to the Lord of their fathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Chapter 31
31PL 23
Quo modo ergo servi qui in nomine Domini veniunt, per hoc ipsum quod subjecti sunt, et serviunt, indicant Dominum, proprietatem ejus referentes: servi quippe sum Domini: sic et Filius qui venit in nomine Patris, proprietatem Patris portat et nomen, et per haec unigenitus Dei Filius approbatur [al. appellatur]. Quia ergo Spiritus sanctus in nomine Filii a Patre mittitur, habens Filii proprietatem, secundum quod Deus est, non tamen (??)ilicitatem, ut Filius ejus sit, ostendit quia unitate sit junctus ad Filium. Unde et Filii dictus est Spiritus, per adoptionem faciens filios eos, qui se recipere voluissent. « Qui enim, » inquit, « estis filii Dei, misit Pater Spiritum Filii sui in corda nostra, clamantem: Abba, Pater. » Iste autem Spiritus sanctus, qui venit in nomine Filii, missus a Patre, docebit omnia eos qui in fide Christi perfecti sunt, omnia autem illa quae spiritualia sunt et intellectualia: et ut breviter universa concludam, omnia veritatis et sapientiae sacramenta. Docebit vero, non quasi doctor et magister disciplinae, quam aliunde est consecutus: siquidem hoc eorum est, qui sapientiam et artes aliquas studio industriaque didicere; sed quasi ipse [al. ipsa] ars atque doctrina et sapientia veritatisque Spiritus, invisibiliter [al. invisibili] menti insinuat scientiam divinorum. Nam et Pater docet sic discipulos suos, dicente illo qui ab eo doctus fuerat: Deus, docuisti me sapientiam. Et audacter alio conclamante: « Docuisti me, Deus, a juventute mea: » atque ita omnes fiunt docti. Dei quoque Filius et sapientia Dei et veritas sic docet participes suos, ut disciplinam non arte doceat, sed natura. Unde et cum docentur solum magistrum vocare discipuli. Has easdem disciplinas quae dantur a Patre et Filio in corda credentium, Spiritus sanctus ministrat his qui animales esse desierint [al. desistunt]. « Animalis quippe homo non percipit ea quae spiritus sunt, » arbitrans esse stultitiam quae dicuntur; qui vero a perturbationibus purgaverit mentem suam, Spiritus sancti disciplinis, id est, sermonibus sapientiae, scientiaeque complebitur, in tantum ut is qui ea susceperit dicat: « Nobis autem revelavit Deus per Spiritum sanctum. » Deus autem his qui se ita praeparaverint, Spiritum sapientiae revelationisque largitur ad cognoscendum semetipsum; qui accipientes Spiritum sapientiae, non aliunde, sed ab ipso Spiritu sancto efficiuntur sapientes, et ab ipso intelligunt Dominum, et quidquid Dei est voluntatis, et eumdem ipsum Spiritum, ipso revelante, cognoscunt, ut sciant quia a Domino donata sunt eis: ita ut is qui fuerit spiritum revelationis et sapientiae consecutus, sufficiens sit veritatis dogmata praedicare non humana, sed Dei arte subnixus: sicut et unum ex his Apostolum possumus audire, dicentem: « Et praedicatio mea et sermo meus non in persuasibilibus humanae sapientiae verbis: sed in ostensione Spiritus et virtutis Dei. » AEqualem vero Spiritui virtutem non possumus aliam praeter Christum Dominum nostrum interpretari. Ipse enim discipulis ait: « Accipietis enim virtutem Spiritus sancti venientem [Vat. venientis] super vos; » et ad Mariam angelus [al. archangelus], « Spiritus, » inquit, « sanctus superveniet in te, et virtus Altissimi obumbrabit tibi. » Creatrix igitur virtus Altissimi, Spiritu sancto superveniente in Virginem Mariam, Christi corpus fabricavit: quo ille usus templo, sine viri natus est semine.
As, then, servants who come in the name of the Lord, by the very fact that they are subject and serve, point to the Lord and convey his particular character (for they are the Lord's servants), so the Son, who comes in the name of the Father, bears the particular character and name of the Father, and through these is shown to be the only-begotten Son of God. Since, then, the Holy Spirit is sent by the Father in the name of the Son, having the Son's particular character inasmuch as he is God, though not his sonship, so as to be his son, he shows that he is joined to the Son in unity. That is why he is also called the Spirit of the Son, making sons by adoption those who were willing to receive him. "Because you are sons of God," he says, "the Father sent the Spirit of his Son into our hearts, crying: Abba, Father." This Holy Spirit, who comes in the name of the Son, sent by the Father, will teach all things to those who are perfect in the faith of Christ: all things that are spiritual and intellectual, and, to sum it all up briefly, all the mysteries of truth and wisdom. He will teach, not as a teacher and master of a discipline he has acquired from elsewhere (that belongs to those who have learned wisdom and some arts by study and diligence), but as being himself the art and teaching and wisdom, the Spirit of truth, he invisibly instils into the mind the knowledge of divine things. For the Father also teaches his disciples in this way, as one taught by him says: "O God, you have taught me wisdom"; and another boldly cries out: "You have taught me, O God, from my youth"; and so all become taught. The Son of God too, the wisdom of God and the truth, so teaches those who share in him that he teaches the discipline not by art but by nature. That is why, when the disciples are taught, they call him alone master. These same disciplines, given by the Father and the Son into the hearts of believers, the Holy Spirit ministers to those who have ceased to be merely natural. "For the natural man does not perceive the things of the Spirit," thinking what is said to be foolishness; but one who has cleansed his mind of disturbances will be filled with the disciplines of the Holy Spirit, that is, with words of wisdom and knowledge, so much that one who has received them says: "But God has revealed it to us through the Holy Spirit." And to those who have so prepared themselves God grants the Spirit of wisdom and revelation for knowledge of himself; and those who receive the Spirit of wisdom are made wise not from elsewhere but by the Holy Spirit himself, and from him they understand the Lord and whatever is of God's will, and they know that same Spirit by his own revelation, so as to know that these things have been given them by the Lord; so that one who has obtained the spirit of revelation and wisdom is fit to preach the doctrines of truth, relying not on human art but on God's, as we can hear one of them, the Apostle, saying: "My preaching and my speech were not in persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of the power of God." The power equal to the Spirit we can interpret as none other than Christ our Lord. For he says to the disciples: "You will receive the power of the Holy Spirit coming upon you"; and the angel says to Mary: "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you." So the creative power of the Most High, the Holy Spirit coming upon the Virgin Mary, fashioned the body of Christ; using it as a temple, he was born without the seed of a man.
Chapter 32
32PL 23
Ex quibus ostenditur esse Spiritum sanctum creatorem, ut jam in Dogmatum volumine breviter ostendimus. Et in Psalmo ad Dominum dicitur: « Auferes ab eis Spiritum tuum, et deficient, et in terram suam revertentur. Emitte Spiritum tuum, et creabuntur, et renovabis faciem terrae.» Nec mirum si Dominici tantum corporis Spiritus sanctus conditor sit, cum Patri Filioque sociatus, eadem potestate creaverit omnia quae Pater creavit et Filius. « Emitte enim, » ait, « Spiritum tuum, et creabuntur.» Porro jam frequenter ostendimus ejusdem operationis esse Spiritum sanctum, cujus est Pater et Filius, et in eadem operatione unam esse substantiam: et reciproce eorum quae όμούσια sunt, operationem quoque non esse diversam. Ut autem et aliud quoque testimonium quod nos possit adjuvare in fide Spiritus sancti ponamus, in Evangelio ita sermo contexitur: « Adhuc multa habeo vobis dicere, sed non potestis ea portare modo. Cum autem venerit ille Spiritus veritatis, diriget vos in omnem veritatem. Neque enim loquetur a semetipso, sed quaecunque audiet, loquetur: et quae ventura sunt annuntiabit vobis. Ille me clarificabit [al. glorificabit]: quia de meo accipiet, et annuntiabit vobis. Omnia quae habet Pater, mea sunt· Propterea dixi vobis, quia de meo accipiet, et annuntiabit vobis. »
From this it is shown that the Holy Spirit is creator, as we have already briefly shown in our book On Doctrines. And in the Psalm it is said to the Lord: "You will take away your Spirit from them, and they will fail and return to their earth. Send forth your Spirit, and they will be created, and you will renew the face of the earth." Nor is it surprising if the Holy Spirit is the maker of the Lord's body alone, since, joined with the Father and the Son, he created by the same power all things that the Father and the Son created. For it says: "Send forth your Spirit, and they will be created." We have already often shown that the Holy Spirit is of the same working as the Father and the Son, and that in the same working there is one substance; and conversely, that things that are consubstantial (ὁμοούσια) do not have different workings. And to set down another testimony that can help us in faith in the Holy Spirit, in the Gospel the passage runs thus: "I still have many things to tell you, but you cannot bear them now. But when that Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all truth. For he will not speak from himself, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will announce to you the things to come. He will glorify me, because he will receive of mine and announce it to you. All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said to you that he will receive of mine and announce it to you."
Chapter 33
33PL 23
Ex his enim sacramentorum verbis edocemur, quod cum multa docuisset discipulos suos Jesus, dixerit: « Adhuc habeo plurima dicere vobis, » quia verbum istud, « adhuc multa habeo dicere vobis,» non ad novos quoslibet, et penitus Dei gratia vacuos dirigitur: sed ad eos qui auditores verborum ejus, necdum fuerant omnia consecuti. Quaecunque enim sufficere poterant, tradens eis, in futurum tempus reliqua distulit: quae sine disciplina Spiritus sancti scire non poterant, quia ante adventum Dominicae passionis non erat datus hominibus Spiritus sanctus, evangelista dicente: « Non enim erat cuiquam Spiritus datus, quia Jesus necdum erat glorificatus. » Glorificari dicens Jesum. mortem gustare pro cunctis. Itaque post resurrectionem apparens discipulis suis, et insufflans in faciem eorum: « Accipite, » inquit, « Spiritum sanctum; » et rursum: « Accipietis virtutem Spiritus sancti venientis super vos. » Quo veniente in corda credentium, implentur sermonibus sapientiae et scientiae, et sic spirituales effecti, suscipiunt Spiritus sancti disciplinam, quae possit eos deducere in omnem veritatem. Necdum enim instante [fort. instabat] hora in qua oportebat eos Spiritu sancto repleri, tunc quando dixit ad eos, « Adhuc multa habeo vobis dicere, » consequenter addidit, « sed non potestis ea portare modo. » Adhuc enim typo legis, et umbrae, et imaginibus servientes, non poterant veritatem (cujus umbram lex portabat) inspicere, unde nec spiritualia sustinere. « Cum autem, » ait, « venerit ille, » hoc est « paracletus Spiritus veritatis, diriget vos in omnem veritatem, » sua doctrina, et institutione vos transferens a morte litterae ad spiritum vivificantem, in quo solo omnis Scripturae veritas posita est. Ipse ergo Spiritus veritatis, ingrediens puram et simplicem mentem, signabit in vobis scientiam veritatis, et semper nova veteribus adjungens, diriget vos in omnem veritatem.
From these sacred words we are taught that, after Jesus had taught his disciples many things, he said: "I still have very many things to tell you," because this word, "I still have many things to tell you", is not addressed to just any newcomers wholly empty of God's grace, but to those who, though hearers of his words, had not yet attained everything. Handing on to them whatever could suffice, he put off the rest to a future time: things they could not know without the teaching of the Holy Spirit, since before the Lord's passion the Holy Spirit had not been given to men, as the evangelist says: "For the Spirit had not been given to anyone, because Jesus was not yet glorified," calling it Jesus' glorification to taste death for all. So after the resurrection, appearing to his disciples and breathing into their faces, he said: "Receive the Holy Spirit"; and again: "You will receive the power of the Holy Spirit coming upon you." When he comes into the hearts of believers, they are filled with words of wisdom and knowledge, and, made spiritual in this way, they receive the teaching of the Holy Spirit, which can lead them into all truth. For since the hour had not yet come in which they were to be filled with the Holy Spirit when he said to them, "I still have many things to tell you", he consequently added: "but you cannot bear them now." For, still serving the type of the law, its shadow and images, they could not look upon the truth, whose shadow the law bore, and so could not bear spiritual things. "But when that one comes," he says, that is, "the Paraclete, the Spirit of truth, he will guide you into all truth," transferring you by his teaching and instruction from the death of the letter to the life-giving spirit, in which alone the truth of all Scripture lies. So the Spirit of truth himself, entering a pure and simple mind, will seal in you the knowledge of truth, and, always adding new things to old, will guide you into all truth.
Chapter 34
34PL 23
Ad Deum quoque Patrem quidam allegans preces, loquitur: « Dirige me in veritate tua, » hoc est, in Unigenito tuo, propria voce testante: « Ego sum veritas. » Quam perfectionem tribuit Deus mittens Spiritum veritatis, qui credentes in totam dirigat veritatem. Dehinc in consequentibus de Spiritu veritatis, qui a Patre mittatur, et sit Paracletus, Salvator (qui et veritas) ait: « Non enim loquetur a semetipso: « hoc est, non sine me, et sine meo et Patris arbitrio, quia inseparabilis a mea et Patris est voluntate, quia non ex se est, sed ex Patre et me est, hoc enim ipsum quod subsistit et loquitur, a Patre et me illi est. Ego veritatem loquor, id est, inspiro quae loquitur; siquidem Spiritus veritatis est. Dicere autem et loqui in Trinitate, non secundum consuetudinem nostram, qua ad nos invicem sermocinamur et loquimur, accipiendum, sed juxta formam incorporalium naturarum, et maxime Trinitatis, quae voluntatem suam inserit in corde credentium, et eorum qui eam audire sunt digni: hoc est, dicere et loqui.
Someone too, addressing his prayers to God the Father, says: "Guide me in your truth," that is, in your Only-begotten, who testifies in his own words: "I am the truth." This perfection God grants by sending the Spirit of truth to guide believers into all truth. Then, in what follows, about the Spirit of truth who is sent by the Father and is the Paraclete, the Saviour, who is also the truth, says: "For he will not speak from himself", that is, not without me, and without my and the Father's will, because he is inseparable from my will and the Father's, because he is not from himself but from the Father and me; for his very subsisting and speaking come to him from the Father and me. I speak the truth, that is, I inspire what he speaks, since he is the Spirit of truth. But speaking and saying in the Trinity must not be taken according to our custom, by which we converse and speak to one another, but according to the manner of incorporeal natures, and especially of the Trinity, which places its will in the hearts of believers and of those who are worthy to hear it: this is what saying and speaking is.
Chapter 35
35PL 23
Nos quippe homines quando de aliqua re ad alterum loquimur, primum quod volumus, mente concipimus absque sermone. Inde in alterius sensum volentes transferre, linguae organum commovemus, et quasi quoddam plectrum chordis dentium collidentes, vocalem sonum emittimus. Quo modo igitur nos linguam, quam palato dentibusque collidimus, et ictum aerem in diversa temperamus eloquia, ut nobis nota communicemus in alios: ita et auditorem necesse est patulas praebere aures, et nullo vitio coarctatas, in ea quae dicuntur arrigere, ut possit ita scire quae proferuntur, quomodo novit ea ille qui loquitur. Porro Deus simplex et incompositae spiritualisque naturae, neque aures, neque organa, quibus vox emittitur, habet; sed solitaria incomprehensibilisque substantia nullis membris partibusque componitur. Quae quidem de Filio et de Spiritu sancto similiter accipienda.
For when we men speak to another about something, we first conceive what we want in the mind without speech. Then, wanting to transfer it into the other's understanding, we set in motion the organ of the tongue and, striking it like a plectrum against the strings of the teeth, we send out a vocal sound. As, then, we strike the tongue against palate and teeth and shape the struck air into various utterances so as to communicate what we know to others, so the hearer must offer open ears, closed by no defect, and attend to what is said, so as to know what is uttered as the speaker knows it. But God, of a simple, uncompounded and spiritual nature, has neither ears nor the organs by which the voice is sent out; a solitary and incomprehensible substance, he is composed of no limbs or parts. The same is to be understood of the Son and the Holy Spirit.
Chapter 36
36PL 23
Si quando ergo legimus in Scripturis: « Dixit Dominus Domino meo; » et alibi: « Dixit Deus, Fiat lux, » et si qua his similia, digne (al. digna) Deo accipere debemus. Neque enim ignorante Filio (qui sapientia et veritas est) Pater suam nuntiat voluntatem, cum omne quod loquitur, sapiens verusque subsistens, in sapientia habeat et in substantia. Loqui ergo Patrem, et audire Filium, vel e contrario. Filio loquente, audire Patrem, ejusdem naturae in Patre et Filio consensusque significatio est. Spiritus quoque sanctus, qui est spiritus veritatis, spiritusque sapientiae, non potest Filio loquente audire quae nescit, cum hoc ipsum sit quod profertur a Filio, id est, procedens a veritate, consolator manans de consolatore, Deus de Deo, Spiritus veritatis procedens. Denique ne quis illum a Patris et Filii voluntate et societate discerneret, scriptum est: « Non enim a semetipso loquetur, sed sicut audiet loquetur. » Cui etiam simile de seipso Salvator ait: « Sicut audio, et judico ·; » et alibi: « Non potest Filius a se facere quidquam, nisi quod viderit Patrem facientem.» Si enim unus est Patri Filius, non juxta Sabellii dictum Patrem et Filium confundentis, sed juxta indiscretionem essentiae, sive substantiae non potest quidquam absque Patre facere, quia separatorum diversa sunt opera, sed videns operantem Patrem, et ipse operatur, non secundo gradu, et post illum operans. Alia quippe Patris, alia Filii opera esse inciperent si non aequaliter fierent. Scriptum est autem: « Quae enim ille facit, » haud dubium quin Pater, « haec eadem Filius similiter facit. » Quod si operante Patre et Filio, non juxta ordinem, primi et secundi, sed juxta idem tempus operandi eadem et indissimilia, subsistunt universa quae fiunt, et Filius non potest a semetipso quidquam facere, qui a Patre non potest separari, sic et Spiritus sanctus nequaquam separatus a Filio, propter voluntatis naturaeque consortium, non semetipso creditur loqui, sed juxta verbum et veritatem Dei loquitur universa quae loquitur. Hanc opinionem sequentia Domini verba confirmant, dicentis: «Ille me clarificabit » [al. glorificabit], id est, Paracletus; « quia de meo accipiet. » Rursum hic, accipere [al. accipiet], ut divinae naturae conveniat intelligendum.
So whenever we read in the Scriptures, "The Lord said to my Lord", and elsewhere, "God said, Let there be light", and anything similar, we must take it in a way worthy of God. For the Father does not announce his will to the Son as one who does not know it, since the Son is wisdom and truth, and all that the Father speaks, subsisting as wise and true, he has in wisdom and in substance. So the Father's speaking and the Son's hearing, or conversely the Son's speaking and the Father's hearing, signify the same nature and agreement in Father and Son. The Holy Spirit too, who is the Spirit of truth and the Spirit of wisdom, cannot, when the Son speaks, hear what he does not know, since he is the very thing that is uttered by the Son, that is, proceeding from the truth, a Comforter flowing from a Comforter, God from God, the Spirit of truth proceeding. Finally, so that no one should separate him from the will and fellowship of the Father and the Son, it is written: "For he will not speak from himself, but as he hears he will speak." Similar to this the Saviour says of himself: "As I hear, I judge"; and elsewhere: "The Son can do nothing of himself except what he sees the Father doing." For if the Son is one with the Father, not in the sense of Sabellius, who confuses the Father and the Son, but according to the lack of distinction of essence or substance, he can do nothing without the Father, since separated beings have different works; but seeing the Father working, he too works, not in second rank, working after him. For the works of the Father and of the Son would begin to be different if they were not done equally. And it is written: "For whatever he does," undoubtedly the Father, "the Son does likewise." If, then, when the Father and the Son work, not in an order of first and second but in the same time of working, all things that are made subsist as the same and not unlike, and the Son, who cannot be separated from the Father, can do nothing of himself, so the Holy Spirit too, in no way separated from the Son because of their fellowship of will and nature, is not believed to speak from himself, but he speaks all that he speaks according to the word and truth of God. The Lord's following words confirm this view: "He will glorify me," that is, the Paraclete, "because he will receive of mine." Here again, "receive" must be understood as befits the divine nature.
Chapter 37
37PL 23
Quomodo ergo Filius dans, non privatur his [al. enim] quae tribuit, neque cum damno suo impertit aliis, sic et Spiritus non accipit quod ante non habuit. Si enim quod prius non habebat accepit, translato in alium munere, vacuus largitor effectus est, cessans habere quod tribuit. Quomodo igitur supra de naturis incorporalibus disputantes intelleximus, sic et nunc Spiritum sanctum a Filio accipere, id quod suae naturae fuerat cognoscendum [al. intelligendum] est, et non dantem et accipientem, sed unam significare substantiam. Siquidem et Filius eadem a Patre accipere dicitur, quibus ipse subsistit. Neque enim quid aliud est Filius, exceptis his quae ei dantur a Patre, neque alia substantia est Spiritus sancti praeter id quod datur ei a Filio. Propterea autem ista dicuntur, ut eamdem in Trinitate credamus esse naturam Spiritus sancti, quae est Patris et Filii.
As, then, the Son in giving is not deprived of what he bestows, nor gives to others at his own loss, so the Spirit does not receive what he did not have before. For if he received what he did not have before, then when the gift was transferred to another, the giver would be left empty, ceasing to have what he gave. As, then, we understood above when discussing incorporeal natures, so now too the Holy Spirit's receiving from the Son must be recognized as what belonged to his own nature, signifying not a giver and a receiver but one substance. For the Son too is said to receive from the Father the very things by which he subsists. For the Son is nothing other than what is given him by the Father, and the substance of the Holy Spirit is nothing other than what is given him by the Son. These things are said so that we may believe that the nature of the Holy Spirit in the Trinity is the same as that of the Father and the Son.
Chapter 38
38PL 23
Quia ergo [al. enim] omnis humana vox nihil potest aliud judicare quam corpora, et Trinitas, de qua nunc nobis sermo est, omnes materiales substantias superat, idcirco nullum verbum potest ei proprie coaptari, et ejus significare substantiam, sed omne quod loquimur, χαταχρηστιχώς, id est, abusive est, et de incorporalibus cunctis, et maxime cum de Trinitate loquimur. Glorificat itaque Filium Spiritus sanctus, ostendens illum et in apertum proferens his qui mundo corde eum intelligere et videre sunt digni, et splendorem substantiae, et imaginem invisibilis Dei scire. Rursum imago ipsa ostendens se puris mentibus, glorificat Patrem, insinuans eum nescientibus, ipse enim ait: « Qui videt me, videt et Patrem. » Pater quoque revelans Filium his qui ad calcem scientiae pervenire meruerunt, glorificat Unigenitum suum, ostendens ejus magnificentiam atque virtutem. Sed et ipse Filius tribuens Spiritum sanctum his qui se dignos ejus munere praeparaverunt, et pandens sublimitatem [al. proprietatem] glorificationis, et magnitudinis ejus virtutem, glorificat illum. Deinde interpretationem inferens cum modo dixisset, de meo accipiet, protinus subjecit: « Omnia quae habet Pater, mea sunt; propterea dixi, de meo accipiet et annuntiabit vobis, » quodammodo loquens, Licet a Patre procedat Spiritus veritatis, et det illi Deus Spiritum sanctum petentibus se, tamen quia omnia quae habet Pater, mea sunt, et ipse Spiritus Patris meus est, et de meo accipiet. Cave autem cum ista dicuntur ne grave labaris intelligentiae in vitium, et putes rem aliquam esse, et possessionem, quae a Patre habeatur ac Filio. Verum quae habet Pater juxta substantiam, id est, aeternitatem, immutabilitatem, incorruptionem, immutabilem bonitatem, de se et in se subsistentem, haec eadem habet et Filius. Et, ut plus inferam, quidquid Filius ipse subsistit, et quaecunque sunt Filii, haec eadem et Pater habet. Procul hinc absint dialecticorum tendiculae, et sophismata a veritate pellantur, quae occasionem impietatis ex pia praedicatione capientia, dicunt: Ergo et Pater est Filius, et Filius Pater. Si enim dixisset, omnia quaecunque habet Deus, mea sunt, haberet impietas occasionem confingendi, et verisimile videretur esse mendacium. Cum vero dixerit, « Omnia quae habet Pater mea sunt, » Patris nomine se Filium declaravit, paternitatem, qui Filius erat, non usurpavit, quanquam et ipse per adoptionis gratiam, multorum sanctorum sit Pater, secundum illud quod in Psalmis legitur, « Si custodierint filii tui; » et iterum: « Si dereliquerint filii ejus legem meam. » Sed in hoc sermone sensuque praeposito, consequenter ea quae diximus superius Patris esse, habet et Filius, et quae Filii sunt, habet et Spiritus sanctus. Ait quippe, « de meo accipiet, propterea et ventura annuntiabit vobis. » Per Spiritum siquidem veritatis, sanctis viris futurorum scientia certa conceditur. Unde et prophetae hoc eodem repleti Spiritu, praenuntiabant sensu, et quasi praesentia intuebantur, quae erant deinceps secutura. Satis haec abundeque juxta ingenii nostri paupertatem de praesenti Evangelii capitulo dixisse sufficiat. Si quibus autem Dominus revelaverit, et in viciniam veritatis adducti sunt, magisque possunt cernere veritatem, disputationi illorum concedamus meliora, quibus ille suffragatur qui est Spiritus veritatis: et petimus eos qui lecturi sunt, ut ignoscant imperitiae, studioque dent veniam, cupienti totum Deo offerre quod potuit, licet suam non quiverit implere voluntatem.
Since every human word can describe nothing but bodies, and the Trinity of which we are now speaking surpasses all material substances, no word can properly fit it and signify its substance; everything we say is said catachrestically, that is, by an improper use of words, both of all incorporeal beings and above all when we speak of the Trinity. So the Holy Spirit glorifies the Son by showing him and bringing him into the open for those who are worthy, with a pure heart, to understand and see him, and to know the radiance of the substance and the image of the invisible God. Again, the image itself, showing itself to pure minds, glorifies the Father, making him known to those who do not know him; for he himself says: "He who sees me sees the Father also." The Father too, revealing the Son to those who have earned to reach the goal of knowledge, glorifies his Only-begotten, showing his greatness and power. And the Son himself, giving the Holy Spirit to those who have prepared themselves to be worthy of his gift, and opening up the loftiness of his glory and the power of his greatness, glorifies him. Then, adding an explanation, after saying "he will receive of mine", he at once added: "All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said, he will receive of mine and announce it to you," saying in effect: Although the Spirit of truth proceeds from the Father, and God gives the Holy Spirit to those who ask him, yet since all that the Father has is mine, the Spirit of the Father himself is mine and will receive of mine. But beware, when these things are said, lest you slip into a serious fault of understanding and think that there is some thing or possession that is held by the Father and the Son. Rather, what the Father has by substance, that is, eternity, unchangeableness, incorruption, unchangeable goodness subsisting from himself and in himself, the Son has the same. And, to add more, whatever the Son himself subsists as, and whatever belongs to the Son, the Father has the same. Away with the snares of the dialecticians, and let sophisms be driven from the truth, which seize an occasion for impiety from pious preaching and say: "Then the Father is the Son, and the Son the Father." For if he had said, "All that God has is mine," impiety would have had an occasion for invention, and the lie would have seemed plausible. But since he said, "All that the Father has is mine," by the name "Father" he declared himself the Son; being Son, he did not claim fatherhood, although he too, by the grace of adoption, is the father of many saints, according to what we read in the Psalms: "If your sons keep"; and again: "If his sons forsake my law." But in this saying and with this sense set forth, it follows that what we said above belongs to the Father the Son also has, and what belongs to the Son the Holy Spirit also has. For he says: "He will receive of mine, and therefore he will announce to you the things to come." For through the Spirit of truth certain knowledge of the future is granted to holy men. That is why the prophets, filled with this same Spirit, foretold in their minds and saw as if present the things that were to follow. Let this suffice, enough and more than enough according to the poverty of our ability, on the present chapter of the Gospel. If the Lord has revealed more to some, and they have been brought near the truth and can see it better, let us yield the better place to their discussion, which he who is the Spirit of truth supports; and we ask those who will read to pardon our lack of skill and forgive our zeal, which longs to offer to God all it could, even if it could not fulfil its wish.
Chapter 39
39PL 23
Proponamus et Apostoli ad Romanos Epistolae testimonium, quaeque nobis in illa videntur praesenti materiae congruere ventilemus. « Ut justificatio, » inquit, « legis impleatur in vobis, qui non juxta carnem ambulatis, sed secundum spiritum. Qui enim juxta carnem sunt, ea quae carnis sunt sapiunt: qui vero juxta spiritum, ea quae spiritus sunt sentiunt. Sapientia quippe carnis mors est; sapientia autem spiritus, vita et pax; quoniam sapientia carnis inimica est Deo: legi quippe Dei non subjicitur; neque enim potest. Qui vero in carne sunt, Deo placere non possunt. Vos autem non estis in carne, sed in Spiritu: si tamen Spiritus Dei habitat in vobis. Si quis autem Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est ejus. Si autem Christus est in vobis, corpus quidem mortuum est propter peccatum, spiritus vero vivit propter justitiam. Si autem Spiritus ejus qui suscitavit Jesum a mortuis, habitat in vobis, qui suscitavit Jesum Christum a mortuis, vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra propter inhabitantem Spiritum ejus in vobis. Ergo, fratres, debitores sumus non carni, ut secundum carnem vivamus. Si enim secundum carnem vixeritis, moriemini; si autem spiritu facta carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis. Quicunque enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei. Non enim accepistis spiritum servitutis iterum in timore; sed accepistis Spiritum adoptionis in quo clamamus: Abba, Pater. Ipse enim Spiritus testimonium perhibet spiritui nostro, quia sumus filii Dei. Si autem filii, et haeredes: haeredes quidem Dei, cohaeredes autem Christi: si tamen compatimur, ut et conglorificemur. » In praesenti Apostoli capitulo plurima de societate Spiritus, quam habet cum Patre et Filio demonstrantur· Ait quippe Apostolus justificationem divinam, et spiritualis legis expleri in his: non qui juxta carnem ambulant, sed juxta Spiritum. Juxta carnem ambulantem, eum qui per voluptates vitia carnis corpori copulatus, facit omnia quae carnis sunt [al. esse] et corporis opera, apostolicus sermo descripsit [al. describit ]. Porro juxta Spiritum ambulantem eum, qui in praeceptis legis Dei et Evangelii gradiens, spiritualium sequitur ordinem mandatorum. Siquidem sicut carnalium vitium est ea sapere quae carnis sunt, ea cogitare quae corporum, sic e contrario spiritualium virtus est, semper cogitare de coelestibus et aeternis, et his tractare quae spiritus sunt. Sed carnis sapientia, illico morte sibi sociata, interficit eos qui juxta carnem gradiuntur et sapiunt; sapientia vero spiritus, mentis tranquillitatem, et pacem, et vitam habentibus se largitur aeternum. Quam cum possederint, omnes perturbationes et genera vitiorum, et ipsos quoque daemones (qui haec suggerere nituntur) habebunt sub pedibus suis. Sapientia ergo carnis cum morti juncta sit, inimica est Deo. Inimicos quippe eos reddit qui suis legibus vixerint; contraria semper, et repugnans voluntati et legi Dei. Neque enim fieri potest, ut qui in sapientia carnis est, Dei praecepta custodiat, et voluntati illius subjiciatur. Quandiu servimus voluptatibus, servire Deo non possumus. Cum autem titillantem subjecerimus nostris pedibus luxuriam, et totos nos ad spiritum transferentes, nequaquam fuerimus in carne, id est-, in carnis passionibus, tunc subjiciemur Deo. Neque enim de carne hac in qua vivimus, et in cujus vasculo nostra anima continetur, Apostoli sermo est, quia omnes sancti, corpore et carne circumdati, placuerunt Deo; sed ad id potius quod contra Dei praeceptum ex humana societate perpetratur, de quibus est: « Diliges Dominum Deum tuum; » et: « Quod tibi non vis fieri, » etc. Vos autem, ait, haud dubium quin discipuli Christi, qui sapientiam Spiritus suscepistis, et vitam et pacem; non estis in carne, id est, in carnis operibus, neque ejus opera perpetratis, siquidem Spiritum Dei habetis in vobis. Idem autem Spiritus Dei, et Spiritus Christi est, deducens et copulans eum qui in se habuerit, Domino Jesu Christo. Unde et in consequentibus scribitur: « Si quis autem Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est ejus. »
Let us set out also a testimony from the Apostle's Epistle to the Romans, and examine what seems to us in it to fit the present subject. "That the righteous requirement of the law may be fulfilled in you, who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. For those who are according to the flesh mind the things of the flesh, but those who are according to the Spirit think the things of the Spirit. For the mind of the flesh is death, but the mind of the Spirit is life and peace; because the mind of the flesh is hostile to God, for it is not subject to the law of God, nor can it be. Those who are in the flesh cannot please God. But you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. If anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not his. But if Christ is in you, the body is dead because of sin, but the spirit lives because of righteousness. If the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Jesus Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies because of his Spirit who dwells in you. So, brothers, we are debtors not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. For if you live according to the flesh, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the flesh, you will live. For all who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. For you did not receive the spirit of slavery again in fear, but you received the Spirit of adoption, in whom we cry: Abba, Father. The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are sons of God. And if sons, then heirs: heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with him, so that we may also be glorified with him." In this chapter of the Apostle very much is shown about the fellowship the Spirit has with the Father and the Son. For the Apostle says that the divine righteousness of the spiritual law is fulfilled in those who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. The apostolic word describes as walking according to the flesh one who, joined to the body by the vices of the flesh through pleasures, does all the works of the flesh and the body. But one who walks according to the Spirit is one who, walking in the precepts of God's law and the Gospel, follows the order of spiritual commands. For as it is the vice of the fleshly to mind the things of the flesh and think of bodily things, so, on the contrary, it is the virtue of the spiritual always to think of heavenly and eternal things and to deal with the things of the Spirit. But the mind of the flesh, joined at once to death, kills those who walk and think according to the flesh; while the mind of the Spirit grants to those who have it tranquillity of mind, peace, and eternal life. When they possess it, they will have under their feet all disturbances and kinds of vices, and the very demons who try to suggest them. Since, then, the mind of the flesh is joined to death, it is hostile to God; for it makes enemies of those who have lived by its laws, being always opposed and resistant to God's will and law. Nor can one who is in the mind of the flesh keep God's precepts and be subject to his will. As long as we serve pleasures, we cannot serve God. But when we have put tickling luxury under our feet and, transferring ourselves wholly to the Spirit, are no longer in the flesh, that is, in the passions of the flesh, then we shall be subject to God. For the Apostle's word is not about this flesh in which we live, in whose little vessel our soul is contained, since all the saints, surrounded by body and flesh, pleased God; but rather about what is committed against God's command in human society, of which it is said, "You shall love the Lord your God," and, "What you do not want done to you," and so on. But you, he says (undoubtedly the disciples of Christ, who have received the mind of the Spirit, and life and peace), are not in the flesh, that is, in the works of the flesh, nor do you commit its works, since you have the Spirit of God in you. And the same Spirit is the Spirit of God and the Spirit of Christ, leading and joining one who has him in himself to the Lord Jesus Christ. That is why in what follows it is written: "If anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not his."
Chapter 40
40PL 23
Rursum in praesenti discimus societatem quam habet Spiritus sanctus ad Deum, et ad Christum. Sed et in Epistola Petri, Spiritus sanctus esse Christi Spiritus comprobatur: « Scrutantes,» inquit. « et inquirentes, » id est prophetae, de quibus ei fuerat sermo superior, « in quod, et quale tempus significabat is, qui in eis erat Spiritus Christi, testificans in Christo passiones, et ea quae post erant secutura decreta: in quibus revelatum est, quia non sibi, sed nobis ministrabant ea quae nunc annuntiata sunt vobis per Spiritum sanctum.» Iste autem Spiritus sanctus dictus est et Spiritus Dei, non in praesenti tantum sermone, sed et in aliis locis compluribus, ut ibi: « Ea quae Dei sunt, nemo novit nisi Spiritus Dei. » Deinde sequitur post hoc quod ait: « Si quis autem Spiritum Dei non habet, hic non est ejus; » et infertur: « Si autem Christus in vobis, » est manifestissime demonstratur inseparabilem esse Spiritum sanctum a Christo: quia ubicunque Spiritus sanctus fuerit, ibi et Christus est, et undecunque Christi Spiritus discesserit, inde pariter recedit et Christus. « Si quis enim Spiritum Christi non habet, hic non est ejus. » Cui conjuncto si quis contrarium assumat, dicere potest: Si quis Christi est, ita ut Christus in eo sit, in hoc Spiritus Dei est. Hoc autem idem et de Deo Patre similiter usurpandum. Si quis Spiritum Dei non habet, iste non est ejus. Cui rursum contrarium si quis assumat, dicens: Si quis Dei est, in hoc Spiritus Dei est. Unde scribitur: » Nescitis quia templum Dei estis, et in vobis habitat Spiritus Dei? » Et in Joannis Epistola: « In hoc cognoscitur Deus habitus in quibusdam, cum manserit in eis Spiritus quem dedit. » Ex quibus omnibus indissolubilis atque indiscreta Trinitatis substantia demonstratur.
Again, in the present passage we learn the fellowship the Holy Spirit has with God and with Christ. In the Epistle of Peter too the Holy Spirit is shown to be the Spirit of Christ: "Searching," he says, "and inquiring", that is, the prophets, of whom he had been speaking just before, "what time and what kind of time the Spirit of Christ who was in them was indicating, testifying beforehand to the sufferings in Christ and the glories decreed to follow; to whom it was revealed that they were serving not themselves but us in the things that have now been announced to you through the Holy Spirit." This Holy Spirit is also called the Spirit of God, not only in the present passage but in many other places, as there: "No one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God." Then, after he says, "If anyone does not have the Spirit of God, he is not his", it is added: "But if Christ is in you"; and it is most plainly shown that the Holy Spirit is inseparable from Christ, since wherever the Holy Spirit is, there Christ is too, and from wherever the Spirit of Christ departs, Christ likewise withdraws. "For if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not his." If someone takes the converse of this conditional, he can say: If anyone is Christ's, so that Christ is in him, the Spirit of God is in him. The same must likewise be applied to God the Father: if anyone does not have the Spirit of God, he is not his. And again, if someone takes the converse, saying: If anyone is God's, the Spirit of God is in him. Hence it is written: "Do you not know that you are the temple of God and the Spirit of God dwells in you?" And in the Epistle of John: "By this it is known that God is possessed by some, when the Spirit whom he gave remains in them." From all these the indissoluble and undivided substance of the Trinity is shown.
Chapter 41
41PL 23
Cum ergo ait: « Si Christus in vobis est, corpus quidem mortuum propter peccatum, » nequaquam vitiis lasciviaeque deserviens, sed mortificatum peccato, non commovetur ad vitia: et nequaquam erit vitale peccato. Postquam autem corpus peccato mortuum fuerit, Christus in his qui sua corpora mortificaverunt, praesens Spiritum vitae ostendit per justitiam sive correctionem operum virtutum immortalium, sive fidem Jesu Christi, in his qui juxta fidem illitis conversantur. Deinde Apostolus alio syllogismo conjuncto utitur, quod significa(??)tius di(??)lectici άξίωμα vocant. et ait: « Si autem Spiritus ejus qui suscitavit Christum a mortuis, habitat in vobis, qui suscitavit Christum a mortuis, vivificabit et mortalia corpora vestra per inhabitantem Spiritum suum in vobis: » nonne tibi videtur dicere, quia si Spiritus ejus qui suscitavit Christum Jesum, id est, qui ejusdem Jesu Christi Spiritus est, habitat in vobis: consequenter vivificabuntur et mortalia corpora vestra cum immortalibus animabus ab eo qui suscitavit Christum Jesum a mortuis, principem et primogenitum resurrectionis? Et quibus tale tantumque divinitus per Spiritum munus indultum est, debitores sumus Spiritui, non carni, ut juxta eam vivamus. Siquidem qui juxta carnem vixerit, morietur illa morte quae peccatum sequitur. « Peccatum quippe cum consummatum fuerit, generat mortem, » secundum Jacobum. Sed et Ezechiel peccantem animam mori scribit. Separatur enim jam a vita, quae in sapientia Spiritus collocata est.
When, then, he says, "If Christ is in you, the body is dead because of sin", meaning a body no longer serving vices and lust but dead to sin, not stirred to vices and in no way alive to sin: after the body has become dead to sin, Christ, present in those who have put their bodies to death, shows the Spirit of life through righteousness, whether the correction of works by immortal virtues or faith in Jesus Christ, in those who live according to faith. Then the Apostle uses another, a conditional syllogism, which the dialecticians call, more expressively, an axiom (ἀξίωμα), and says: "If the Spirit of him who raised Christ from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit dwelling in you." Does he not seem to you to say that if the Spirit of him who raised Christ Jesus, that is, the Spirit who is the Spirit of the same Jesus Christ, dwells in you, your mortal bodies too, together with your immortal souls, will consequently be given life by him who raised Christ Jesus from the dead, the prince and firstborn of the resurrection? And we to whom so great a gift has been granted by God through the Spirit are debtors to the Spirit, not to the flesh, to live according to it. For one who lives according to the flesh will die that death which follows sin. "For sin, when it is completed, brings forth death," according to James. And Ezekiel too writes that the soul that sins will die. For it is now separated from life, which is placed in the mind of the Spirit.
Chapter 42
42PL 23
Si quis autem transcenderit vitam carnis et Spiritu opera carnis mortificaverit, vivet carnis et aeternaque vita relatus in filios Dei, et directus in viam rectam propter Spiritum sanctum, qui et Dei Spiritus appellatur·« Si enim, » inquit, « juxta carnem vixeritis, moriemini. Quod si spiritu facta carnis mortificaveritis, vivetis; » et in consequentibus: « Quotquot enim Spiritu Dei aguntur, hi filii sunt Dei.» Rursum refocillans eos, et consolans, et provocans sperare meliora, quibus loquebatur, ait: « Non enim accepistis iterum spiritum servitutis in timore, » id est, non similitudine servorum, metu et terrore poenarum vos abstinetis a vitiis, quia habetis vobis datum a Patre Spiritum adoptionis, id est Spiritum sanctum, qui ipse Spiritus, et Dei, et Christi, et veritatis dicitur atque sapientiae. Si autem Spiritus iste adoptat in filios Dei eos, quorum dignatione sui habitator efficitur, tibi consequentium super potentia ejus intelligentiam derelinquo. Porro in hoc adoptionis Spiritu clamant qui habuerunt illum Patrem Deum, sicut ostendit sermo dicens: « In quo clamamus: Abba, Pater: » ipso Spiritu qui nos adoptat in filios, testimonium praebente participatione sui, quod a nostro Spiritu possidetur, quia filii Dei sumus. Cui consequens est Deum quidem quasi patrem, hereditarias nobis divitias contulisse, spiritualia dona; Christi vero cohaeredes nos esse, eo quod fratres ejus per gratiam et benignitatem ipsius appellamur. Erimus autem haeredes Dei, cohaeredes autem Christi si compatiamur, ut et conglorificari ei ex passionum societate mereamur.
But if anyone rises above the life of the flesh and by the Spirit puts to death the works of the flesh, he will live, counted among the sons of God with eternal life, and directed into the right way because of the Holy Spirit, who is also called the Spirit of God. "For if you live according to the flesh," he says, "you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the flesh, you will live"; and in what follows: "For all who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God." Again, reviving and comforting those to whom he was speaking, and calling them to hope for better things, he says: "For you did not receive again a spirit of slavery in fear," that is, you do not keep yourselves from vices like slaves, from fear and terror of punishment, because you have the Spirit of adoption given you by the Father, that is, the Holy Spirit, who is called the Spirit of God, of Christ, of truth and of wisdom. And if this Spirit adopts as sons of God those in whom, by his condescension, he comes to dwell, I leave to you the understanding of what follows about his power. In this Spirit of adoption those who have had God as Father cry out, as the passage shows: "In whom we cry, Abba, Father"; the Spirit himself, who adopts us as sons, bearing witness, by the share in himself that our spirit possesses, that we are sons of God. It follows that God, as a father, has bestowed on us the riches of an inheritance, spiritual gifts, and that we are fellow heirs of Christ, because by his grace and kindness we are called his brothers. We shall be heirs of God and fellow heirs of Christ if we suffer with him, so that we may earn to be glorified with him through the fellowship of his sufferings.
Chapter 43
43PL 23
Verum quia et hoc juxta id quod potuimus edissertum est, proponamus prophetae capitulum, quaedam de Spiritu sancto continens, ut non solum de Novo, verum etiam de Veteri Testamento super ejus fide intellectuque doceamur. Nam et superius praelocuti sumus, in omnibus sanctis, tam his qui post adventum Domini nostri fuerunt, quam etiam retro, in patriarchis videlicet et prophetis, Spiritus sancti gratiam fuisse versatam, et eos diversis charismatibus virtutibusque complesse. Quomodo enim unius Dei et Unigeniti ejus gratiam possidentes, tam hi qui ante, quam etiam illi qui post adventum ejus, justitiae erexere vexillum, veritatis sunt scientiam consecuti; sic et Spiritus sancti gratiam possidebunt, quia inseparabilem a Patre et Filio esse, Spiritum sanctum in multis supra locis ostendimus. Scriptum est ergo in propheta: « Misericordiae Domini recordatus sum, et virtutis ejus in omnibus quae retribuit nobis. Dominus judex bonus domui Israel, infernis nobis juxta misericordiam suam, et juxta multitudinem justitiae suae. Et dixit: Nonne populus meus filii et non praevaricabuntur. Et factus est illis in salutem ex omni tribulatione eorum; non legatus, neque angelus, sed ipse salvavit eos, eo quod dilexerit eos, et pepercerit eis. Ipse redemit eos, et susceperit eos, et exaltavit eos in omnibus diebus saeculi. Ipsi vero non crediderunt, et irritaverunt Spiritum sanctum ejus; et conversus est eis ad inimicitiam. Ipse debellavit eos et recordatus est dierum antiquorum. Qui eduxit de terra pastorem ovium, qui posuit in eis Spiritum sanctum, congregans dextera Moysen. »
But since this too has been set out as far as we could, let us set out a chapter of the prophet containing some things about the Holy Spirit, so that we may be taught about faith in him and understanding of him not only from the New but also from the Old Testament. For we said earlier that the grace of the Holy Spirit was present in all the saints, both those who lived after the coming of our Lord and those before, that is, the patriarchs and prophets, and filled them with various gifts and powers. For just as those who raised the standard of righteousness, both before and after his coming, possessed the grace of the one God and his Only-begotten and attained knowledge of the truth, so they will possess the grace of the Holy Spirit too, since we have shown above in many places that the Holy Spirit is inseparable from the Father and the Son. It is written, then, in the prophet: "I remembered the mercies of the Lord and his powers in all that he has rendered to us. The Lord is a good judge to the house of Israel; he brings upon us according to his mercy and according to the multitude of his righteousness. And he said: Are they not my people, sons, and they will not transgress? And he became their salvation out of all their tribulation; not an envoy, nor an angel, but he himself saved them, because he loved them and spared them. He himself redeemed them and took them up and lifted them up all the days of the age. But they did not believe, and they provoked his Holy Spirit, and he was turned to enmity against them. He himself fought against them, and he remembered the days of old: he who brought up from the earth the shepherd of the sheep, who put his Holy Spirit in them, gathering Moses with his right hand."
Chapter 44
44PL 23
Qui frequenter Dei adepti sunt beneficia, scientes gratia magis, et misericordia ejus, quam propriis ex se fuisse operibus consecutos, quasi uno omnes consensu, et animo concordantes loquuntur, « Misericordiae Domini recordatus sum. » Cogitantes enim quae ab eo frequenter in Moyse dona susceperint, gratias referunt, et cum misericordia, etiam virtutum Domini recordantur, sive mirabilium, quae crebro pro eis fecit in populis, sive protectuum animae, quibus per legem, et prophetas, et praecepta ejus salubria eruditi sunt. Siquidem in Scripturis nomen virtutis utrumque significat. Recordari autem se misericordiae et virtutum ejus, inquiunt, in omnibus quae retribuit eis, non juxta justitiam suam, sed juxta misericordiam et bonitatem ejus, qui est judex domui videnti, et sensui mundo corde cernenti Dominum. Hoc siquidem ex Hebraeo sermone in lingua nostra interpretatur Israel, id est, mens videns Deum. Licet enim tormenta, et cruciatus judex nonnunquam inferat judicium merentibus, tamen qui causas rerum altius intuetur, videns propositum bonitatis ejus, qui cupit corrigere peccantem, bonum illum confitetur, dicens:« Inferens [al. inferas] nobis juxta misericordiam suam. » Si enim iniquitates eorum quos judicat attendat Dominus, quis sustinebit? Porro quia apud Dominum propitiatio est, Dominus videlicet noster atque Salvator infert nobis secundum misericordiam suam, omnia quae nos provehant ad salutem. Inferens quoque juxta misericordiam suam, et hoc faciens in judicio, cum justitia nobis tribuit, quae admista misericordiae bonitate largitus est.
Those who have often received God's benefits, knowing that they obtained them by his grace and mercy rather than by their own works, speak as if all with one consent and of one mind: "I remembered the mercies of the Lord." For thinking of the gifts they often received from him through Moses, they give thanks, and together with his mercy they remember also the Lord's powers, whether the wonders he often did for them among the peoples, or the benefits to the soul by which they were instructed through the law and the prophets and his saving precepts; for in the Scriptures the word "power" signifies both. They say that they remember his mercy and powers in all that he rendered to them, not according to their righteousness but according to the mercy and goodness of him who is judge to the house that sees, to the mind that with a pure heart beholds the Lord. For this is the meaning of Israel, translated from the Hebrew language into ours: a mind seeing God. For although the judge sometimes brings torments and tortures on those who deserve judgment, yet one who looks more deeply into the causes of things, seeing the purpose of the goodness of him who wishes to correct the sinner, confesses that he is good, saying: "Bringing upon us according to his mercy." For if the Lord should mark the iniquities of those he judges, who will stand? But since there is propitiation with the Lord, our Lord and Saviour brings upon us according to his mercy everything that advances us toward salvation. And bringing according to his mercy, and doing this in judgment, he gives to us with justice what he has bestowed with the goodness of mercy mixed in.
Chapter 45
45PL 23
Arguendus est ex praesenti capitulo haereticorum error, qui bonitatem a justitia separantes, alium Deum bonum, alium justum finxerunt. Ecce enim in praesentiarum ipse est Deus, et bonus, et judex, et juxta misericordiam suam justitiamque restituens, et pariter bonus justusque subsistens. Frustra igitur iniquum dogma simulantes, bonum Deum Evangelii, et Veteris Testamenti justum esse defendunt quia et in plurimis aliis locis, et nunc in prophetae sermone, « judex bonus » scribitur Deus, et e contrario quod nolunt, in Pauli apostoli Epistola (qui certe Novi Testamenti praedicator est) Deus justus judex refertur. « Reposita est mihi, » inquit, « corona justitiae, quam reddet mihi Dominus in illa die justus judex. » Idem est ergo, licet nolint, Novi et Veteris Testamenti Deus, visibilium et invisibilium conditor, Salvatore etiam in Evangelio justum et bonum Patrem liquido attestante: « Pater juste, mundus te non cognovit.» Et In alio loco: « Nemo bonus, nisi unus Deus. » Sed et in veteri lege alibi justus, alibi bonus dicitur Deus. In Psalmis, « Justus Dominus,» inquit, « et justitias dilexit. » Et e contrario in Jeremia, « Bonus Dominus his qui sustinent eum.» Rursus in Psalmis: « Quam bonus Deus Israel, his qui recto sunt corde. » Et haec quidem e latere contra haereticos strictum dicta sunt. Tempus autem est, ut propositum prophetae ordinem prosequamur, qui ita contexitur: « et dixit, » haud dubium quin Dominus: « Nonne populus meus filii, nec praevaricabuntur? » Non erant, inquit, similes his qui generati sunt et exaltati, et eum qui genuit illos, despexere. «Et factus est eis in salutem, » id est iliis de quibus Dominus ait: « Nonne populus meus filii, et non praevaricabuntur? » Hoc enim ipsum quod non praevaricati sunt, nec spreverunt Patrem, eis factus est in salutem: vel ob id ipsum quod appellati sunt filii, causa eis salutis effectus est. Quae salus a Christo Domino contributa, angeli quoque ad pastores voce firmatur, dicentis: « Ecce evangelizo vobis gaudium magnum, quod erit omni populo; quia natus est vobis hodie Salvator, qui est Christus Dominus, in civitate David.» Ipse factus est cunctis, qui in eum credunt, occasio salutis aeternae, et Ipse est Salvator mundi, qui venit quaerere quod perierat. Et ipse est, de quo chorus sanctorum canit: « Deus noster, Deus salvandi.»
From the present chapter the error of the heretics must be refuted, who, separating goodness from justice, invented one God who is good and another who is just. For see, here the same God is both good and judge, rendering according to his mercy and his justice, and subsisting as good and just alike. In vain, then, pretending a wicked doctrine, do they maintain that the God of the Gospel is good and the God of the Old Testament just; for in very many other places, and now in the prophet's words, God is written "a good judge", and, on the contrary, as they do not wish, in the Epistle of the apostle Paul (who is certainly a preacher of the New Testament) God is called a just judge: "There is laid up for me," he says, "the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the just judge, will render to me on that day." So, though they do not wish it, the God of the New and of the Old Testament is the same, the maker of things visible and invisible, the Saviour too in the Gospel plainly testifying that the Father is just and good: "Just Father, the world has not known you." And in another place: "No one is good but God alone." And in the old law too God is called just in one place and good in another. In the Psalms: "The Lord is just," it says, "and loves righteousness." And on the other hand in Jeremiah: "The Lord is good to those who wait for him." Again in the Psalms: "How good is the God of Israel to those who are upright in heart!" These things have been said in passing against the heretics. But it is time to follow the prophet's order as set out, which runs thus: "And he said", undoubtedly the Lord, "Are they not my people, sons, and they will not transgress?" They were not, he says, like those who were begotten and exalted and despised him who begot them. "And he became their salvation", that is, of those of whom the Lord says, "Are they not my people, sons, and they will not transgress?" For the very fact that they did not transgress or despise the Father became salvation for them; or, because they were called sons, he became for them the cause of salvation. This salvation, bestowed by Christ the Lord, is confirmed also by the voice of the angel to the shepherds: "Behold, I bring you good news of great joy, which will be for all the people; for to you is born this day a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord, in the city of David." He became for all who believe in him the occasion of eternal salvation, and he is the Saviour of the world, who came to seek what was lost. And he is the one of whom the choir of saints sings: "Our God is a God of saving."
Chapter 46
46PL 23
Quia igitur Deus erat, qui salutem praebebat aeternam, dictum est,« Non legatus, neque angelus,» id est non propheta, non patriarcha, non legislator Moyses salvavit eos. Omnes enim quos nominavi, poterant ad Dominum fungi legatione pro populo. Denique Moyses, interpellans eum pro delinquente plebe, ait: «Si dimittis eis peccatum eorum, dimitte.» Sed obsecravit veniam quadraginta diebus jejunans, et misericordiam Dei animae afflictione provocans. Nemo autem de horum numero legatorum potest esse salvator, indigens et ipse eo, qui salutis largitor verus est. Nam et angeli, quanquam spiritus sint, et ad diversa propter eos qui salutem accepturi sunt, ministeria mittantur, non sunt tamen auctores salutis, sed eum qui fons salutis est, interpretantur et nuntiant. Unde dictum est, « non legatus, neque angelus, sed ipse Dominus salvavit eos. » Non propter aliud quid, sed propter id, « quod diligeret eos, et parceret eis.» Parcere autem dicitur, quasi creaturis suis, juxta illud quod alibi scribitur: « Parces autem omnibus. Domine amator animarum, quia tuae sunt, neque enim odies quos fecisti. » Quapropter et pro eorum salute proprio Filio non parcens Pater, tradidit eum in mortem, ut per mortem Filii sui destructo eo qui habebat mortis imperium, hoc est diabolo, redimeret omnes qui ab eo captivitatis vinculo tenebantur. Unde subjicitur: « Ipse autem redemit eos, et suscepit eos, et exaltavit illos.» Suscipit enim exaltatque salvatos, et redemptos in sublime tollit virtutum alis, et eruditione et scientia veritatis, non ad unum tantum, et alterum diem, sed in omnibus diebus aeternitatis, habitans in eis, et cum eis, et usque ad consummationem saeculi vitam eis tribuens, salutisque auctor exsistens. Omnibus autem diebus saeculi illuminans corda eorum, non sinit eos in tenebris ignorantiae, et errore versari. Et hoc puto esse quod scriptum est, « in omnibus diebus » exaltari eos.
Since, then, it was God who gave eternal salvation, it is said, "Not an envoy, nor an angel", that is, no prophet, no patriarch, not Moses the lawgiver saved them. For all those I have named could act as envoys to the Lord on behalf of the people. Moses, interceding with him for the sinning people, said: "If you forgive them their sin, forgive." But he begged for pardon fasting forty days, and moved God's mercy by affliction of soul. Yet none of these envoys can be a saviour, since he himself needs him who is the true giver of salvation. For the angels too, although they are spirits and are sent to various ministries for the sake of those who will receive salvation, are not the authors of salvation, but interpret and announce him who is the fountain of salvation. That is why it is said, "Not an envoy, nor an angel, but the Lord himself saved them": for no other reason than this, "because he loved them and spared them". He is said to spare them as his own creatures, according to what is written elsewhere: "But you spare all things, Lord, lover of souls, because they are yours; for you do not hate what you have made." That is why the Father, not sparing his own Son for their salvation, handed him over to death, so that through the death of his Son, destroying him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, he might redeem all who were held by him in the bond of captivity. Hence it is added: "He himself redeemed them and took them up and lifted them up." For he takes up and lifts up those who are saved, and raises the redeemed on high on the wings of virtues, by instruction and knowledge of the truth, not for one day or two but for all the days of eternity, dwelling in them and with them, and giving them life to the end of the age, and being the author of their salvation. And in all the days of the age, enlightening their hearts, he does not let them remain in the darkness of ignorance and in error. And this, I think, is what is written: that they are lifted up "all the days".
Chapter 47
47PL 23
Quia vero mutabiles, et ad vitia sponte labentes, post tanta beneficia Deo fuerunt increduli, et praecepta illius reliquerunt, et exacerbaverunt Spiritum sanctum Dei, qui eis multa bona largitus est, in peccatum simile corruerunt, his qui postquam geniti sunt, et exaltati, spreverunt Patrem suum. Vel certe nunc ipsi describuntur, qui et ante descripti sunt, siquidem et ibi post peccatum dicitur ad eos: « Dereliquistis Dominum, et ad iracundiam concitastis Sanctum Israel, » et nunc, quod « ipsi non crediderunt, et exacerbaverunt Spiritum sanctum ejus.» Ex praesenti ergo loco societas Spiritus ad Dominum ostenditur. Qui dereliquit Dominum, et est incredulus, et ad iracundiam provocat Sanctum Israel, et exacerbat Spiritum sanctum ejus. Eadem indignatio super peccatoribus tam ad Spiritum sanctum, quam ad Sanctum Israel refertur· Unde et in consequentibus similibus copula Trinitatis ostenditur, dicente Scriptura, Dominum ad inimicitias esse conversum, his qui exacerbaverunt Spiritum sanctum ejus, et tradidisse eos sempiterno cruciatui, postquam non sermone, sed rebus in sanctum ejus Spiritum blasphemaverunt. Ipse igitur qui « eis conversus est ad inimicitiam, debellavit eos, » et subjecit multiplicibus longisque cruciatibus, ut nec in praesenti tempore, nec in futuro consequantur veniam peccatorum. Exacerbaverunt enim Spiritum sanctum ejus, et blasphemaverunt in illum.
But since, being changeable and slipping into vices of their own will, after such great benefits they did not believe God, and abandoned his precepts, and embittered the Holy Spirit of God, who had given them many good things, they fell into a sin like that of those who, after they were begotten and exalted, despised their Father. Or perhaps the same people are described now who were described before, since there too it is said to them after their sin: "You have forsaken the Lord and provoked to anger the Holy One of Israel"; and now, that "they did not believe and embittered his Holy Spirit." From the present passage, then, the fellowship of the Spirit with the Lord is shown. One who forsakes the Lord, and is unbelieving, and provokes the Holy One of Israel to anger, also embitters his Holy Spirit. The same indignation at sinners is ascribed both to the Holy Spirit and to the Holy One of Israel. Hence in what follows too the bond of the Trinity is shown by similar words, since Scripture says that the Lord was turned to enmity against those who embittered his Holy Spirit and handed them over to everlasting torment, after they had blasphemed against his Holy Spirit not by word but by deeds. He, then, who "was turned to enmity against them, fought against them" and subjected them to many and long torments, so that they obtain pardon of sins neither in this present time nor in the future. For they embittered his Holy Spirit and blasphemed against him.
Chapter 48
48PL 23
Si autem volueris hoc de Judaeis intelligere, qui crucifixerunt Dominum Salvatorem, et idcirco exacerbaverunt Spiritum sanctum, id quod scriptum est, « ipse debellavit eos, » ad illam est intelligentiam referendum, quod Romanis traditi sunt, quando venit super eos ira Dei in finem. In universo enim orbe cunctisque regionibus soli exsules patriae, in terra vagantur aliena, non urbem antiquam, non sedes proprias possidentes, id quod prophetis et Salvatori suo fecerunt, receperunt. Quia enim sanguinarii, et vesano semper furore capti, non solum prophetas occiderunt, lapidaveruntque eos qui ad se missi fuerant, sed ad impietatis culmen egressi, Dominum Salvatorem, qui pro cunctorum salute descendere dignatus fuerat ad terras, prodiderunt et crucifixerunt, propterea expulsi sunt urbe quam prophetarum et Christi cruore maculaverunt. Secundum igitur hunc sensum debellatos eos a Domino intelligere debemus, non ad breve tempus, sed ad omne futurum saeculum usque ad consummationem mundi. Quippe (ut diximus) profugi atque captivi, in universis aberrant nationibus, non urbem, non regionem propriam possidentes. Attamen quia naturaliter benignus est et misericors is qui eos debellaverat, tribuit eis locum poenitentiae, si velint ad meliora converti. Unde et dicitur, « recordatus est dierum saeculi. » Recordatus enim temporum futurorum, clausam januam aliqua eis ex parte reseravit, ut postquam intraverit plenitudo gentium, tunc omnis Israel (qui hac fuerit dignus appellatione) salvetur. Licet enim in id temeritatis eruperint, ut eum qui propter eos missus fuerat, interficerent, dicentes: « Sanguis ejus super nos, et super filios nostros, » tamen Deus suscitavit eum de terra, in cujus corde tribus diebus et tribus noctibus fuerat commoratus: pastorem ovium suarum. Siquidem ita contexitur, « qui eduxit de terra pastorem ovium suarum. »
But if you wish to understand this of the Jews who crucified the Lord and Saviour and therefore embittered the Holy Spirit, what is written, "he himself fought against them", must be referred to that understanding, that they were handed over to the Romans when the wrath of God came upon them to the end. For in the whole world and in all regions they alone are exiles from their homeland and wander in a foreign land, possessing neither their ancient city nor their own dwellings; they have received what they did to the prophets and to their Saviour. For since they were bloodthirsty and always gripped by insane fury, they not only killed the prophets and stoned those sent to them, but, going on to the summit of impiety, they betrayed and crucified the Lord and Saviour, who had deigned to come down to earth for the salvation of all; and therefore they were driven out of the city which they had stained with the blood of the prophets and of Christ. In this sense, then, we must understand that they were fought against by the Lord, not for a short time but for all the age to come, to the end of the world. For, as we said, fugitives and captives, they wander among all nations, possessing no city and no land of their own. Yet since he who fought against them is by nature kind and merciful, he gives them a place for repentance if they are willing to turn to better things. That is why it is said, "He remembered the days of the age." For remembering future times, he has opened the closed door to them in part, so that after the fullness of the Gentiles has come in, then all Israel (whoever is worthy of this name) may be saved. For although they burst out into such rashness as to kill him who had been sent for their sake, saying, "His blood be on us and on our children", yet God raised up from the earth him in whose heart he had remained three days and three nights, the shepherd of his sheep. For the passage runs: "Who brought up from the earth the shepherd of his sheep."
Chapter 49
49PL 23
Quod vero pastor ovium Deus, qui nunc prophetali sermone describitur, Dominus sit, manifestius in Evangelio discimus, ipso Salvatore testante, « Ego sum pastor bonus, et animam meam pono pro ovibus meis·.» Et iterum: « Oves meae vocem meam audiunt ·.» Post haec omnia prophetes ait, « Ubi est qui posuit super eos Spiritum sanctum? » Admiratur quippe de quanta felicitate ad quantas miserias pervenerint. Et quodam modo loquitur: Qui eos redemerat, qui posuerat in illis Spiritum sanctum suum, habitans cum eis, ubi nunc est? quo abiit? Dereliquit eos, quia ipsi prius dereliquerunt, et ad iracundiam provocaverunt Sanctum Israel. Posuerat autem dudum in eis Spiritum sanctum Deus, cum adhuc boni essent, et praeceptis ejus obsequi niterentur. His enim tantummodo Spiritus sanctus inseritur, qui, vitiis derelictis, virtutum sectantur chorum, et juxta eas, et per eas in fide Christi victitant. Quod si paulatim negligentia subrepente coeperint ad pejora confluere, concitant adversum se habitatorem suum Spiritum sanctum, et eum qui illum dederat, convertunt ad inimicitias. Huic quid simile et Apostolus ad Thessalonicenses scribens, ait, « Neque enim vocavit nos Deus ad immunditiam, sed ad sanctificationem. »
That the shepherd of the sheep of God, now described in the prophet's words, is the Lord, we learn more plainly in the Gospel, the Saviour himself testifying: "I am the good shepherd, and I lay down my life for my sheep." And again: "My sheep hear my voice." After all this the prophet says: "Where is he who put his Holy Spirit upon them?" He marvels from how great happiness to how great miseries they have come, and in a way he says: He who had redeemed them, who had put his Holy Spirit in them, dwelling with them, where is he now? Where has he gone? He has forsaken them, because they forsook him first and provoked the Holy One of Israel to anger. God had once put his Holy Spirit in them, while they were still good and strove to obey his precepts. For the Holy Spirit is put only into those who, abandoning vices, follow the choir of virtues and live according to them and by them in the faith of Christ. But if, as negligence gradually creeps in, they begin to slide toward worse things, they stir up against themselves the Holy Spirit who dwells in them, and turn to enmity him who had given him. Something like this the Apostle too says, writing to the Thessalonians: "For God did not call us to uncleanness but to sanctification."
Chapter 50
50PL 23
Itaque qui spernit, sive quod melius habetur in Graeco, « qui praevaricatur,» non hominem praevaricabitur, sed Deum, qui dedit Spiritum sanctum suum in vobis. Nam in his sermonibus Deus vocans per fidem in sanctificationem, id est ut sancti Spiritus fierent credentes, dedit eis Spiritum sanctum. Et quandiu praecepta Dei servaverunt, permansit in eis Spiritus sanctus, quem acceperunt. Quando vero amore lubrico corruerunt, et ad immunditiam sunt delapsi, spreverunt, sive praevaricati sunt Dominum, qui dederat eis Spiritum sanctum, ut non immunditiae deservirent, sed ut sanctificarentur. Unde poenas luent qui ista commiserunt, non quasi hominem, sed quasi Deum spernentes. Et ut sciamus Dominum esse Spiritum sanctum, qui datur credentibus, ex ipsius prophetae Isaiae discamus eloquio, qui inducit ad quempiam dicentem Dominum: « Spiritus meus in te est, et verba mea dedi in os tuum.» Ostenditur enim ex sermone praesenti, quod qui acceperit Spiritum Dei, simul cum eo et verba Dei possideat, sermones videlicet scientiae et sapientiae. Necnon et in alio loco ejusdem prophetae Deus loquitur: « Dedi Spiritum meum super eum. » Qui ergo posuit in eis Spiritum sanctum, Moysen dextera sua sanctificatum esse commemorat, sive illum illustrem virum, et mysteriorum Dei initiatorem, de quo ad Jesum filium Nave Dominus ait: « Moyses famulus meus, » sive Legem suam, quae in Veteri scripta est Instrumento. Nam crebro legisse me memini Moysen appellatum esse pro lege, ut in Apostolo: « Usque in hodiernum diem, quando legitur Moyses. » Et Abraham ad divitem in suppliciis constitutum, « Habent, » inquit, « Moysen et prophetas.» Et certe liquido comprobatur ibi Moysen, non supradictum virum significatum esse, sed legem.
"Therefore whoever despises", or, as the Greek has it better, "whoever transgresses", "transgresses not against man but against God, who has given his Holy Spirit in you." For in these words God, calling to sanctification through faith, that is, so that believers might become of the Holy Spirit, gave them the Holy Spirit. And as long as they kept God's commands, the Holy Spirit whom they received remained in them. But when they fell through slippery love and slid into uncleanness, they despised, or transgressed against, the Lord who had given them the Holy Spirit, so that they should not serve uncleanness but be sanctified. So those who have committed these things will pay the penalty, as despising not a man but God. And to know that the Holy Spirit who is given to believers is Lord, let us learn from the words of the prophet Isaiah himself, who presents the Lord saying to someone: "My Spirit is in you, and I have put my words in your mouth." The present passage shows that one who has received the Spirit of God possesses with him the words of God too, namely words of knowledge and wisdom. And in another place of the same prophet God says: "I have put my Spirit upon him." He, then, who put his Holy Spirit in them records that Moses was sanctified by his right hand, whether that famous man, the initiator into God's mysteries, of whom the Lord said to Joshua son of Nun, "Moses my servant", or his Law, which is written in the Old Instrument. For I remember having often read that "Moses" is used for the law, as in the Apostle: "To this very day, when Moses is read." And Abraham says to the rich man placed in torment: "They have Moses and the prophets." And there it is clearly proved that "Moses" signifies not the man mentioned above but the law.
Chapter 51
51PL 23
Porro quae est dextra Dei, quae adduxit Moysen, nisi Dominus et Salvator noster? Ipse est enim dextera Patris, per quem salvat et exaltat et facit virtutem, sicut alibi de Deo dicitur: « Salvavit sibi dextera sua, et brachium sanctum ejus.» Et rursum: « Dextera Domini fecit virtutem, dextera Domini exaltavit me: non moriar, sed vivam, et narrabo opera Domini. » Et certe vocem hanc ex persona Dominici Hominis proferri, quem unigenitus Filius Dei assumere dignatus est ex virgine. ex ipso loco manifeste comprobatur, quia ipse est dextera Dei, sicut scriptum est in Actibus apostolorum, quod factus sit ex semine David secundum carnem, genitus de Virgine, superveniente in eam Spiritu sancto, et virtute Excelsi obumbrante eam. De quo David prophetavit in Spiritu, quod a mortuis resurgens, assumptus sit in coelos, dextera Dei sublevatus. Scribitur ibi autem in hunc modum: « Providens idem David locutus est de resurrectione Christi, quoniam non derelictus in inferno, neque caro ejus vidit corruptionem. Hunc Jesum suscitavit Deus, cui nos omnes testes sumus. Dextera igitur Dei elevatus, et repromissionem Spiritus sancti accipiens a Patre, effudit hoc donum in nobis, quod vos videtis et auditis, neque enim David ascendit in coelos. » Nulli quippe dubium, exaltatum dextera Dei, et ab inferis resurgentem esse Dominum Jesum, sicut ipse Scripturae sermone testatus est. Iste ergo qui resurrexit a mortuis dicit: « Ego dormivi et somnum cepi, et resurrexi, quia Dominus suscitavit me. »
And what is the right hand of God that led Moses, if not our Lord and Saviour? For he is the right hand of the Father, through whom he saves and exalts and does mighty deeds, as is said of God elsewhere: "His right hand and his holy arm have saved for him." And again: "The right hand of the Lord has done mighty deeds; the right hand of the Lord has exalted me; I shall not die but live, and tell the works of the Lord." That this voice is uttered in the person of the Lord's Man, whom the only-begotten Son of God deigned to assume from the virgin, is clearly proved by the passage itself, since he is the right hand of God, as is written in the Acts of the Apostles: that he was made of the seed of David according to the flesh, born of the Virgin, the Holy Spirit coming upon her and the power of the Most High overshadowing her. Of him David prophesied in the Spirit that, rising from the dead, he was taken up into heaven, lifted up by the right hand of God. It is written there thus: "Foreseeing this, David spoke of the resurrection of Christ, that he was not abandoned in hell, nor did his flesh see corruption. This Jesus God raised up, of which we are all witnesses. Being therefore exalted by the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this gift on us, which you see and hear; for David did not ascend into heaven." No one doubts that the Lord Jesus is the one exalted by the right hand of God and rising from hell, as he himself testified in the words of Scripture. He, then, who rose from the dead says: "I lay down and slept, and I rose, because the Lord raised me up."
Chapter 52
52PL 23
Ipse ergo sermone Dei assumptus in coelum, elevatus esse ab ea, de qua supra diximus, dextera Dei praedicatur, et accepisse repromissiones Spiritus sancti a Patre, et effudisse illum in credentes, ita ut omnium linguis loquerentur magnalia Dei. Nam et Dominicus Homo accepit communicationem Spiritus sancti, sicut in Evangeliis scribitur; « Jesus ergo repletus Spiritu sancto, regressus est a Jordane; » et in alio loco: « Reversus est Jesus in virtute Spiritus in Galilaeam. » Haec autem absque ulla calumnia de Dominico Homine, qui totus Christus, unus est Jesus Filius Dei, sensu debemus pietatis accipere, non quod alter et alter sit, sed quod de uno atque eodem, quasi de altero secundum naturam Dei, et hominis disputetur, et quia Deus Verbum unigenitus Filius Dei, neque immutationem recipit, nec augmentum. Siquidem ipse est bonorum omnium plenitudo.
He, then, taken up into heaven by the word of God, is proclaimed to have been lifted up by the right hand of God of which we spoke above, and to have received the promises of the Holy Spirit from the Father, and to have poured him out on believers, so that they spoke in the tongues of all peoples the great deeds of God. For the Lord's Man too received communion with the Holy Spirit, as is written in the Gospels: "Jesus, then, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan"; and in another place: "Jesus returned in the power of the Spirit into Galilee." These things we must take, without any cavilling, in a sense of piety concerning the Lord's Man, who is the whole Christ, the one Jesus, Son of God: not that he is one and another, but that we speak of one and the same as if of another, according to the nature of God and of man; and because God the Word, the only-begotten Son of God, admits neither change nor increase, since he is the fullness of all good things.
Chapter 53
53PL 23
Satis abundeque de prophetae testimonio disputatum est, nec ad reliqua pergamus, ut quomodo scimus quod Pater et Filius sanctos et bonos sui communicatione perficiunt: sic sanctus quoque Spiritus participatione sui bonos efficiat sanctosque credentes; et ex hoc etiam unius cum Patre et Filio substantiae esse doceatur. Dicitur in Psalmis ad Dominum: « Spiritus tuus bonus deducet me in terram rectam·. » Scimus autem in quibusdam exemplaribus scriptum esse, « Spiritus sanctus tuus.» Porro in Esdra absque ulla ambiguitate bonus Spiritus appellatur: « Spiritum tuum bonum dedisti, ut eos faceres intelligere. » Quod autem Pater sanctificet, Apostolus scribit, dicens: « Deus autem pacis sanctificet vos perfectos. » Et Salvator ait: « Pater sancte, sanctifica eos in veritate, quia verbum tuum est veritas. » Perspicue dicens: In me (qui Verbum tuum sum, et veritas tua) sanctifica illos fide et consortio mei. Dictus est et alibi bonus Deus: « Nemo bonus, nisi unus Deus. » Superius quoque ostendimus quoniam Filius sanctificet, Paulo in eadem verba congruente: « Etenim qui sanctificat, et qui sanctificantur, ex uno omnes. » Sanctificantem significans Christum, et sanctificatos eos, qui possunt dicere, « Factus est nobis sapientia ex Deo Christus, et justitia, et sanctificatio. » Appellatur siquidem et Spiritus sanctificationis. Unde et ad eum dicitur: « Et omnes sanctificat sub manibus tuis, et sub te sunt. » Bonus Dominus noster Jesus Christus, et ex bono Patre generatus est, et de eo legimus: « Confitemini Domino, quoniam bonus. » Confiteantur illi autem qui ab eo aut veniam obsecrant peccatorum, aut gratias referunt ejus clementiae pro indultis beneficiis. Spiritus quoque sanctus eos quos dignatur implere, sanctificat, ut superius jam demonstratum est, quando ostendimus eum participabilem et a multis simul capi posse. Et nunc in praesenti Pauli testimonio largitor sanctificationis ostenditur, in eo quod ait: « Debemus autem et nos gratias agere Deo semper pro vobis, fratres dilecti a Domino, quia elegit Deus nos primitias in salutem, in sanctificatione Spiritus sancti, et fide veritatis » Nam et in hoc loco charismata Dei subintelliguntur in Spiritu, cum in sanctificatione Spiritus, fides pariter, et veritas possidentur.
Enough and more has been said on the prophet's testimony; let us go on to the rest, so that, as we know that the Father and the Son make men holy and good by communion with themselves, so it may be taught that the Holy Spirit too makes believers good and holy by participation in himself, and from this that he is of one substance with the Father and the Son. It is said to the Lord in the Psalms: "Your good Spirit will lead me into the right land." We know that in some copies it is written, "Your Holy Spirit." In Ezra, without any ambiguity, he is called the good Spirit: "You gave your good Spirit to make them understand." That the Father sanctifies, the Apostle writes, saying: "May the God of peace sanctify you completely." And the Saviour says: "Holy Father, sanctify them in the truth, because your word is truth", plainly meaning: in me, who am your Word and your truth, sanctify them by faith and fellowship with me. And elsewhere God is called good: "No one is good but God alone." We have also shown above that the Son sanctifies, Paul agreeing in these words: "For he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified are all from one", meaning by him who sanctifies Christ, and by the sanctified those who can say: "Christ became for us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification." He is also called the Spirit of sanctification. Hence it is said to him: "And all the sanctified are under your hands, and they are under you." Our Lord Jesus Christ is good and was begotten of a good Father, and of him we read: "Give thanks to the Lord, for he is good." Let those give thanks who either beg from him pardon for sins or thank his clemency for benefits bestowed. The Holy Spirit too sanctifies those he deigns to fill, as has already been shown above, when we showed that he can be shared and received by many at once. And now in the present testimony of Paul he is shown as the giver of sanctification, when he says: "But we ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers beloved by the Lord, because God chose us as firstfruits for salvation, in the sanctification of the Holy Spirit and faith in the truth." For in this place too God's gifts are understood to be in the Spirit, since in the sanctification of the Spirit faith and truth are possessed together.
Chapter 54
54PL 23
Quia ergo recte, et pie, et ut se veritas habet, haec diximus, sanctificationis, bonitatisque vocabulum, et ad Patrem, et ad Filium· et ad Spiritum sanctum aeque refertur, sicut ipsa quoque appellatio Spiritus. Nam et Pater Spiritus dicitur, ut ibi: « Spiritus est Deus: »et Filius Spiritus: « Dominus, » inquit, « Spiritus est. » Spiritus autem sanctus, semper Spiritus sancti appellatione censetur, non quod ex consortio tantum nominis Spiritus cum Patre ponatur et Filio, sed quod una natura, unum possideat et nomen. Quia vero Spiritus vocabulum multa significat, enumerandum est breviter quibus rebus nomen ejus aptetur. Vocatur spiritus et ventus, sicut in Ezechiele: « Tertiam autem partem disperges in spiritum: » hoc est, in ventum. Quod si volueris secundum historiam illud sentire, quod scriptum est, « In spiritu violento conteres naves Tharsis,» non aliud ibi spiritus, quam ventus accipitur. Necnon Salomon inter multa hoc quoque munus a Deo accepit, ut sciret violentias spirituum; non aliud se in hoc accepisse demonstrans, quam scire rapidos ventorum flatus, et quibus causis eorum natura subsistat. Vocatur et anima spiritus, ut in Jacobi Epistola: « Quomodo corpus tuum sine spiritu mortuum est, » et reliqua. Manifestissime enim spiritus hic nihil aliud nisi anima nuncupatur. Juxta quam intelligentiam et Stephanus animam suam spiritum vocans, « Domine, » inquit, « Jesu, suscipe spiritum meum. » Illud quoque quod in Ecclesiaste dicitur: « Quis scit an spiritus hominis ascendat sursum, et spiritus jumenti descendat deorsum? » Considerandum utrumnam et pecudum animae spiritus appellentur. Dicitur etiam excepta anima, et excepto spiritu nostro, spiritus alius quis esse in homine, de quo Paulus scribit: « Quis enim scit hominum ea quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in eo est? » Si enim voluerit contendere quispiam animam hic significari in spiritu, quis erit homo cujus cogitationes, et arcana, et secreta cordis occulta nesciat homo nisi spiritus ejus, quia de corpore solitario hoc intelligere velle perstultum est.
Since, then, we have said these things rightly and piously and according to the truth, the terms holiness and goodness are applied equally to the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, as is the very name "Spirit". For the Father is called Spirit, as there: "God is Spirit"; and the Son is called Spirit: "The Lord," it says, "is the Spirit." But the Holy Spirit is always reckoned under the name of Holy Spirit; not that he is placed with the Father and the Son only because they share the name "Spirit", but because, being one nature, they possess one name too. But since the word "spirit" signifies many things, we must briefly list the things to which the name is applied. Wind is called spirit, as in Ezekiel: "The third part you shall scatter to the spirit", that is, to the wind. And if you choose to take literally what is written, "With a violent spirit you will shatter the ships of Tarshish", spirit there means nothing other than wind. Solomon too, among many other gifts, received this from God, that he should know the violence of spirits, showing that what he received here was nothing other than knowing the rushing blasts of the winds and the causes on which their nature depends. The soul too is called spirit, as in the Epistle of James: "As your body without the spirit is dead", and so on. Here most plainly spirit means nothing other than the soul. In this understanding Stephen too, calling his soul spirit, says: "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit." And as to what is said in Ecclesiastes, "Who knows whether the spirit of man goes upward and the spirit of the beast goes downward?", it must be considered whether the souls of beasts too are called spirits. It is also said that there is another spirit in man, besides the soul and besides our spirit, of which Paul writes: "For who among men knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man that is in him?" For if anyone wishes to argue that the soul is signified here by spirit, who is the man whose thoughts and hidden things and secrets of the heart no one knows except his spirit? For it is utterly foolish to want to understand this of the body alone.
Chapter 55
55PL 23
Quod si arguta nititur fraude subrepere, de Spiritu sancto haec scripta contestans; si diligenter verba ipsa consideret, cessabit asserere mendacium. Siquidem ita scriptum est: « Quis enim scit hominum quae sunt hominis, nisi spiritus hominis, qui in eo est? Sic et ea quae sunt Dei, nemo scit, nisi Spiritus Dei. » Quomodo enim alius est homo, alius est Deus, sic et spiritus hominis, qui est in eo, separatur a Spiritu Dei, qui est in eo: quem Spiritum sanctum frequenter ostendimus. Sed et in alio loco idem Apostolus a nostro spiritu Spiritum Dei secernens, ait: « Ipse Spiritus testimonium perhibet spiritui nostro·, » hoc significans, quod spiritus Dei, id est Spiritus sanctus, testimonium spiritui nostro praebeat: quem nunc diximus esse Spiritum hominis. Ad Thessalonicenses quoque: « Integer, » inquit, « spiritus vester, et anima et corpus. » Sicut enim alia est anima, et corpus aliud: sic et aliud est spiritus ab anima, quae suo loco specialiter appellatur. De quo et oravit [al. orat], ut integer cum anima servetur et corpore, quia incredibile est, atque blasphemum, orare Apostolum, ut Spiritus sanctus integer servetur, qui nec imminutionem potest recipere, nec profectum. De humano ergo, ut diximus, spiritu in hoc Apostoli sermo testatus est.
But if someone tries to slip in with clever fraud, claiming that these words are written of the Holy Spirit, he will cease to assert the lie if he considers the words themselves carefully. For it is written thus: "For who among men knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man that is in him? So also no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God." For as man is one thing and God another, so the spirit of man, which is in him, is distinguished from the Spirit of God, who is in him, whom we have often shown to be the Holy Spirit. And in another place too the same Apostle, distinguishing the Spirit of God from our spirit, says: "The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit", meaning that the Spirit of God, that is, the Holy Spirit, bears witness to our spirit, which we have just said is the spirit of man. To the Thessalonians also he says: "May your spirit, soul and body be kept whole." For as the soul is one thing and the body another, so the spirit is other than the soul, which in its own place is specifically named. He prayed that it might be kept whole with the soul and body, since it is incredible and blasphemous that the Apostle should pray that the Holy Spirit be kept whole, who can receive neither diminution nor increase. So, as we said, the Apostle's word testifies here about the human spirit.
Chapter 56
56PL 23
Appellantur quoque supernae rationabilesque virtutes, quas solet Scriptura angelos et fortitudines nominare, vocabulo spiritus, ut ibi: « qui facis [al. facit et suos] angelos tuos spiritus; » et alibi: « Nonne omnes sunt administratores spiritus? » Puto ad hunc sensum et illud referri, quod in Actibus apostolorum scribitur: « Spiritus Domini rapuit Philippum, et non amplius eum vidit eunuchus, » id est angelus Domini in sublime elevans Philippum. transtulit illum in alium locum. Rationales quoque aliae creaturae, et de bono in malum sponte propria profluentes, spiritus pessimi, et spiritus appellantur immundi; sicut ibi: « Cum autem spiritus immundus exierit ab homine; » et in consequentibus: « Assumit septem alios spiritus nequiores se. » Spiritus quoque daemones in Evangeliis appellantur. Sed et hoc notandum, nunquam simpliciter spiritum, sed cum aliquo additamento spiritum significari contrarium, ut spiritus immundus, et spiritus daemonis; hi vero qui sancti sunt spiritus, absque ullo additamento spiritus simpliciter appellantur·
The higher, rational powers, which Scripture usually calls angels and powers, are also called by the name of spirit, as there: "You who make your angels spirits"; and elsewhere: "Are they not all ministering spirits?" I think that what is written in the Acts of the Apostles also belongs to this sense: "The Spirit of the Lord caught up Philip, and the eunuch saw him no more", that is, an angel of the Lord, lifting Philip on high, carried him to another place. Other rational creatures too, sliding of their own will from good to evil, are called most wicked spirits and unclean spirits, as there: "When the unclean spirit has gone out of a man"; and in what follows: "He takes seven other spirits more wicked than himself." Demons too are called spirits in the Gospels. But this too should be noted: the opposing spirit is never signified by "spirit" simply, but with some addition, as "unclean spirit" and "spirit of a demon"; whereas those spirits that are holy are called simply spirits, without any addition.
Chapter 57
57PL 23
Sciendum quoque quod nomen spiritus, et voluntatem hominis, et animi sententiam sonet. Volens quippe Apostolus virginem non solum opere, sed et mente sanctam esse, id est, non tantum corpore, sed et motu cordis interno, ait: « Ut sit sancta corpore et spiritu; » voluntatem spiritu et corpore opera significans. Considera utrum hoc ipsum in Isaia sonet, quod scriptum est: « Et scient, qui spiritu errant, intellectum. » Qui enim errore judicii alia pro aliis bona [al. bono studio] existimant, accipient intellectum, ut corrigatur error illorum, ut pro pravis ea quae recta sunt eligant. Necnon et illud: « Una fortitudo spiritus vestri [al. nostri].» vide an idipsum ostendat. Et super omnia vocabulum spiritus altiorem et mysticum in Scripturis sanctis significat intellectum, ut ibi: « Littera occidit, spiritus autem vivificat;» litteram dicens simplicem, et manifestam juxta historiam narrationem; spiritum vero, sanctum et spirituale nosse quod legitur. In hanc congruit voluntatem et illud; « Nos sumus circumcisio, qui spiritu Domino servientes sumus, et non in carne confidentes. » Qui enim non littera carnem concidunt, sed cor spiritu circumcidunt, auferentes omne ejus superfluum, quod generationi proximum est, et amicum, hi vere spiritu circumcisi sunt, in occulto Judaei, et veri Israelitae, in quibus non est dolus. Qui transcendentes umbras et imagines Veteris Testamenti, cultores veri adorant Patrem in spiritu et veritate: in spiritu, quia corporalia et humilia transcenderunt; In veritate, quia typos, et umbras, et exemplaria relinquentes, ad ipsius veritatis venere substantiam; et, ut jam diximus, humili et corporea verborum simplicitate contempta, ad spiritualem legis notitiam pervenerunt.
It should be known too that the name "spirit" also means a man's will and the intention of his mind. For the Apostle, wanting a virgin to be holy not only in deed but in mind, that is, not only in body but in the inner movement of the heart, says: "That she may be holy in body and spirit", meaning the will by spirit and deeds by body. Consider whether what is written in Isaiah has the same meaning: "And those who err in spirit will know understanding." For those who by an error of judgment think some things good in place of others will receive understanding, so that their error may be corrected and they may choose what is right instead of what is perverse. See whether this too shows the same: "One strength of your spirit." And above all, the word "spirit" signifies in the holy Scriptures a higher and mystical understanding, as there: "The letter kills, but the spirit gives life", calling letter the simple narrative, plain according to the history, and spirit the holy and spiritual knowledge of what is read. In this sense fits also: "We are the circumcision, who serve the Lord in spirit and do not trust in the flesh." For those who do not cut the flesh by the letter but circumcise the heart by the spirit, removing from it everything superfluous that is close and friendly to generation, are truly circumcised in spirit, Jews in secret, and true Israelites in whom there is no guile. Passing beyond the shadows and images of the Old Testament, as true worshippers they worship the Father in spirit and truth: in spirit, because they have passed beyond bodily and lowly things; in truth, because, leaving types and shadows and patterns, they have come to the substance of truth itself; and, as we have already said, despising the lowly and bodily simplicity of the words, they have reached a spiritual knowledge of the law.
Chapter 58
58PL 23
Haec interim juxta possibilitatem ingenii nostri quot res spiritus significaret, attigimus, suo tempore quid unumquodque significet, si Christus tribuerit, disserturi. Nonnunquam autem Spiritus, et Dominus noster Jesus Christus, id est, Dei Filius appellatur. « Benignus siquidem est Spiritus sapientiae. » Et in alio loco: « Dominus autem Spiritus est » ut ante diximus, ubi etiam illud adjunximus, « Spiritus Deus est, » non juxta nominis tantum communionem, sed juxta naturae substantiaeque consortium. Quomodo enim quorum diversa substantia est, interdum evenit ut communi vocabulo nuncupentur, et haec dicuntur όμώνυμα. ita eorum, quorum eadem est natura atque substantia, cum societate vocabuli, naturae quoque aequalitas copulatur, et disciplinae dialecticorum est appellare haec συνώνυμα. idcirco et Spiritus vocabulum, et si quid aliud in Trinitate usurpari solet, συνώνυμον est; verbi gratia, sanctus, bonus, et caetera his similia, de quibus paulo ante perstrinximus.
For the present, according to the capacity of our understanding, we have touched on how many things "spirit" signifies; in due time, if Christ grants it, we shall discuss what each signifies. Sometimes our Lord Jesus Christ, that is, the Son of God, is also called Spirit: "For the Spirit of wisdom is kind." And in another place: "The Lord is the Spirit", as we said before, where we also added, "God is Spirit", not by a mere sharing of the name but by a fellowship of nature and substance. For as it sometimes happens that things whose substance is different are called by a common word, and these are called homonyms (ὁμώνυμα), so with things whose nature and substance are the same, equality of nature is joined to the sharing of the word, and the discipline of the dialecticians calls these synonyms (συνώνυμα). Therefore the word "Spirit", and any other that is usually used in the Trinity, for example "holy", "good", and the like, of which we spoke a little before, is a synonym.
Chapter 59
59PL 23
Porro ad haec necessario devoluti sumus, ut quia frequenter appellatio spiritus in Scripturis est respersa divinis, non labamur in nomine, sed unumquodque secundum locorum varietates et intelligentias accipiamus. Omni itaque studio ac diligentia vocabulum Spiritus, ubi et quomodo appellatum sit, contemplantes, sophismata eorum et fraudulentas decipulas conteramus, qui Spiritum sanctum asserunt creaturam. Legentes enim in propheta, « Ego sum firmans tonitruum, et creans Spiritum, » ignorantia multiplicis in hac parte sermonis, putaverunt Spiritum sanctum ex hoc vocabulo demonstrari, cum in praesentiarum spiritus nomen ventum sonet. Necnon in Zacharia audientes locutum Dominum, quod ipse sit qui creat spiritum hominis in eo, existimaverunt Spiritum sanctum etiam in hoc capitulo significari, non animadvertentes quod animam hominis, aut spiritum (quem tantum in homine esse jam diximus) spiritus appellatio significet. Ergo ut praelocuti sumus, quomodo unumquodque dictum sit, consideremus, ne forte per ignorantiam in barathrum decidamus erroris. Siquidem in aliis rebus ex consortio vocabulorum error eveniens, confusionem et pudorem ei qui erravit importat; de supernis vero et divinis lapsus ad prava, ad aeternam poenam deducit et tartarum [al. barathrum], maxime cum semel deceptus noluerit resipiscere, sed suum defensare impudenter errorem. Decebat etiam, et magnitudo voluminis exigebat, ut finem acciperet oratio.
We have necessarily come round to these points so that, since the name "spirit" is scattered frequently in the divine Scriptures, we may not slip on the name but take each instance according to the variety of places and meanings. So, examining with all zeal and care where and how the word "Spirit" is used, let us crush the sophisms and deceitful snares of those who assert that the Holy Spirit is a creature. For reading in the prophet, "I am he who makes firm the thunder and creates spirit", through ignorance of the manifold use of the word in this matter they thought that the Holy Spirit was shown by this word, whereas here the name "spirit" means wind. And hearing in Zechariah that the Lord said that he is the one who creates the spirit of man within him, they thought that the Holy Spirit was signified in this chapter too, not noticing that the name "spirit" signifies the soul of man, or the spirit which we have already said is in man. So, as we said before, let us consider how each thing is said, lest through ignorance we fall into the pit of error. For in other matters an error arising from a shared word brings confusion and shame to the one who erred; but a slip into falsehood about heavenly and divine things leads to eternal punishment and Tartarus, especially when one who has once been deceived refuses to come to his senses but shamelessly defends his error. It was fitting, too, and the size of the volume required, that the discourse should come to an end.
Chapter 60
60PL 23
Verum quia infert se quaestio adversus ea quae superius disputavimus: quam idcirco tunc praetermisimus, ne textum sermonis irrumperet, et inter piam praedicationem impia contentio poneretur, necessarium puto ad propositum respondere, et lectoris arbitrio, quid super his sentiat, derelinquere. Disputantibus ergo supra, quod animam vel mentem hominis nulla creatura juxta substantiam possit implere, nisi sola Trinitas, quia tantummodo secundum operationem, et voluntatis errorem, sive virtutem, animus de his quae creata [al. sociata] sunt impletur: oborta est quaestio nostra, quasi sententiam solvens, quod creata substantia, quae in Scripturis Satanas appellatur, ingrediatur in aliquos, et cor quorumdam implere dicatur. Nam ad eum qui medietatem pretii de agro vendito sibi, aliud profitens, reservaret, a Petro apostolo dictum est: « Anania, quare implevit Satanas cor tuum? » Et de Juda loquitur ipse Salvator, quod intraverit in eum Satanas, Ad quod postea respondendum est. Interim nunc disputemus adversum id quod scriptum est, « quare implevit Satanas cor tuum? » quomodo Satanas mentem alicujus et principale cordis impleat, non ingrediens in eum et in sensum ejus, atque, ut ita dicam, aditum cordis introiens, si quidem haec potestas solius est Trinitatis; sed quasi callidus quidam et nequam ac fallax fraudulentusque deceptor, in eos animam humanam malitiae affectus trahit, per cogitationes et incentiva vitiorum, quibus ipse plenus est. Denique et ipse Elymas magus filius diaboli, juxta malitiam nequitiamque subsistens, plenus omni dolo et malitia, scribitur « Satana patre ejus, » hanc ei voluntatem, quasi ex consuetudine vitiorum in naturam ver l(??)(??)te. Arguens itaque eum apostolus Paulus atque corripiens ait: « O plene omni iniquitate, et omni dolo, fili diaboli, inimice justitiae Dei » Quia enim versipellis et callidus, omnem in se dolum fraudulentiae susceperat, appellatur filius diaboli, quia implebat ipse omnem principale illius fraude et iniquitate, et omni malitia; in tantum illi(??) iens eum atque decipiens, ut ipse Satanas implesse animam ipsius, et habitare in eodem putaretur, quem ad omnes suae perversitatis dolos, ministrum sibi ac famulum praeparaverat.
But since a question arises against what we argued above, which we passed over then so as not to break the thread of the discourse and set an impious dispute in the midst of pious preaching, I think it necessary to answer it as proposed and leave to the reader's judgment what he thinks of it. When we argued above that no creature can fill the soul or mind of a man by substance, but only the Trinity, since the mind is filled by created things only by way of activity, error of will, or virtue, our question arose as if overturning that statement: that a created substance, which in the Scriptures is called Satan, enters into some and is said to fill the heart of some. For to the man who, while professing otherwise, kept back for himself half the price of the field he had sold, the apostle Peter said: "Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart?" And the Saviour himself says of Judas that Satan entered into him. To this we shall reply afterwards. For now let us discuss the text "Why has Satan filled your heart?", how Satan fills someone's mind and the governing part of the heart: not by entering into him and into his mind, and, so to speak, going in through the entrance of the heart, since this power belongs to the Trinity alone; but as a cunning, wicked, false, and fraudulent deceiver, he draws the human soul into the feelings of wickedness through the thoughts and incitements to vices of which he himself is full. So Elymas the magician too, a son of the devil, subsisting in malice and wickedness, full of all guile and malice, is written to have Satan as his father, this will having been turned in him, as it were, by habit of vice into nature. So the apostle Paul, rebuking and reproving him, says: "O you full of all iniquity and all guile, son of the devil, enemy of the righteousness of God." For because he was crafty and cunning, and had taken into himself every guile of deceit, he is called a son of the devil, since the devil filled his whole governing part with fraud, iniquity and all malice, deceiving and beguiling him so much that Satan himself was thought to have filled his soul and to dwell in the man whom he had prepared as his minister and servant for all the deceits of his perversity.
Chapter 61
61PL 23
Ad id vero quod secundum posueramus [Vat. proposueramus] exemplum, quia in Judam introisset Satanas, hoc dicendum est. Observans diabolus quibusdam motibus et operationum signis, ad quae potissimum Judae cor esset vitia proclivius, deprehendit eum patere insidiis avaritiae, et reperta cupiditatis janua, misit in mentem ejus quomodo desideratam pecuniam acciperet, et per occasionem lucri, proditor magistri et Salvatoris sui exsisteret, argentum pro pietate commutans, et suscipiens pretium sceleris a Pharisaeis atque Judaeis. Haec ergo cogitationis occasio locum tribuit Satanae, ut in cor ejus introiens, impleret eum pessima voluntate. Introivit ergo non secundum substantiam, sed secundum operationem, quia introire in aliquem, mercatae naturae est ejus, quae participetur a pluribus. Impar(??)(??)cipabilis ergo diabolus est, non creator, sed creatura subsistens. Unde et convertibilis atque mutabilis, e sanctitate decidit atque virtute. Diximus supra μετοχικόν [erat μετοχικώς], id est, quod participatione capiatur, esse incorruptibile et immutabile, et consequenter aeternum. Quod autem mutari potest, factum esse et habere principium. Porro quod incorruptibile sit, esse et retro et deinceps sempiternum. Non ergo, ut quidam putant, participatione naturae, sive substantiae implet quempiam diabolus, aut ejus habitator efficitur, sed per fraudulentiam, et deceptionem, et malitiam, habitare in eo creditur quem replevit. Hac autem fallacia etiam presbyteros, qui adversus Susannam in crudelitatem se verterant, intravit, implens animas eorum incendio libidinis, et sera senii voluptate. Scriptum est enim: « Venerunt autem et duo presbyteri, pleni iniqua cogitatione.» His insidiis implevit et universum populum Judaeorum, dicente propheta de eo: « Vae gens peccatrix, populus plenus peccatis, semen pessimum, filii iniqui, » Semen quippe nequam diabolus, et filii ejus, propter iniquitatem et plenitudinem, dicti sunt peccatores. Si autem ab his qui ejus in Scripturis filii nominantur, juxta substantiae participationem non capitur [al. nuncupantur], siquidem impossibile hoc esse in creaturis frequenter ostensum est, neque alius quis potest eum capere participatione substantiae, sed tantummodo assumptione fraudulentissimae voluntatis. Operationem quippe et studia non solum bonorum operum, sed etiam malorum in creaturis diximus; naturam vero atque substantiam solius in alios posse Trinitatis intrare.
As to the second example we had set out, that Satan entered into Judas, this must be said. The devil, observing by certain movements and signs of action to which vices Judas's heart was most inclined, caught him open to the snares of avarice; and, having found the door of greed, he put into his mind how he might get the money he desired and, for the sake of gain, become the betrayer of his master and Saviour, exchanging piety for silver and receiving the price of the crime from the Pharisees and Jews. This occasion of thought gave Satan room to enter his heart and fill him with a most evil will. So he entered not by substance but by activity, since to enter into someone belongs to that nature alone which is shared by many. So the devil is not shareable; he is not creator but subsists as a creature. That is why, being alterable and changeable, he fell from holiness and virtue. We said above that what is shareable (μετοχικόν), that is, what is received by participation, is incorruptible and unchangeable, and consequently eternal; and that what can be changed has been made and has a beginning; and that what is incorruptible is everlasting both backward and forward. So the devil does not fill anyone, as some think, by participation in his nature or substance, nor does he become his indweller; but he is believed to dwell in the one he has filled through fraud, deception and malice. By this deceit he also entered the elders who turned to cruelty against Susanna, filling their souls with the fire of lust and the late pleasure of old age. For it is written: "And the two elders came, full of wicked thought." With these snares he also filled the whole people of the Jews, as the prophet says of it: "Woe, sinful nation, people full of sins, most wicked seed, lawless sons." For the devil is the wicked seed, and his sons, because of their iniquity and fullness, are called sinners. And if he is not received by participation of substance by those who are named his sons in the Scriptures (for it has often been shown that this is impossible in creatures), neither can anyone else receive him by participation of substance, but only by taking on a most deceitful will. For we have said that the activity and pursuit not only of good works but also of evil ones are found in creatures, but that only the nature and substance of the Trinity can enter into others.
Chapter 62
62PL 23
Abunde, ut reor, occursum est propositiae quaestioni. Quia vero ineptum et stultum videtur, adversus fatua respondere, et si quid in buccam ruerit [al. irruit] impiorum, hoc velle dissolvere; non enim tantum impietas est, scelerata proponere, quantum et de sceleratis cum resistente velle tractare; idcirco illud quod solent jactare, praetereo sacrilega adversus nos audacia proclamantes: Si Spiritus sanctus creatus non est, aut frater est Dei Patris, aut patruus est unigeniti Jesu Christi, aut filius Christi est, aut nepos est Dei Patris, aut ipse Filius Dei est, et jam non erit unigenitus Dominus Jesus Christus, cum alterum fratrem habeat. Miseri atque miserabiles, non sentientes de incorporeis et invisibilibus, juxta corporalium et visibilium disputari non licere naturam. Fratrem esse vel patruum, nepotem vel filium, corporum nomina sunt, et imbecillitatis humanae vocabula. Trinitas vero omnes has praetergreditur nuncupationes. Et quotiescunque in aliqua de his cadit; nominibus nostris, et incongruis vocabulis non suam naturam loquitur. Cum igitur sancta Scriptura amplius de Trinitate non dicat, nisi Deum Patrem esse Salvatoris, et Filium generatum esse a Patre, hoc tantummodo debemus sentire quod scriptum est. Et ostenso quod Spiritus sanctus increatus sit, consequenter intelligere, quod cujus non est creata substantia, recte Patri Filioque societur.
The proposed question has, I think, been answered fully. But since it seems silly and foolish to answer fatuities and to want to refute whatever comes into the mouths of the impious (for it is not so much impiety to propose wicked things as to want to discuss wicked things with an opponent), I pass over what they usually throw out, crying out against us with sacrilegious audacity: "If the Holy Spirit is not created, he is either the brother of God the Father, or the uncle of the only-begotten Jesus Christ, or the son of Christ, or the grandson of God the Father, or himself the Son of God, and then the Lord Jesus Christ will no longer be only-begotten, since he has another brother." Wretched and pitiable men, not perceiving that about incorporeal and invisible things one may not argue according to the nature of corporeal and visible things! Brother or uncle, grandson or son, are names of bodies and words of human weakness. But the Trinity goes beyond all these designations. And whenever it falls under any of them, it is spoken of in our names and inadequate words, not according to its own nature. Since, then, holy Scripture says no more about the Trinity than that God is the Father of the Saviour and that the Son was begotten by the Father, we must think only what is written. And once it has been shown that the Holy Spirit is uncreated, we must consequently understand that he whose substance is not created is rightly joined with the Father and the Son.
Chapter 63
63PL 23
Haec juxta eloquii nostri paupertatem in praesenti dicta sufficiant· timorem meum, quod de Spiritu sancto loqui ausus sim, indicantia. Quicunque enim in eum blasphemaverit, non solum in hoc saeculo, verum etiam in futuro non dimittetur ei, nec ulla misericordia et venia reservabitur illi qui conculcaverit Filium Dei, et injuriam [al. contumeliam] fecerit Spiritui gratiae ejus, in quo sanctificatus est. Quod quidem et in Deo Patre est intelligendum. Nam qui blasphemaverit in eum, et impie egerit, sine venia cruciabitur, nullo pro eo Dominum deprecante, sicut scriptum est, « Qui autem in Dominum Deum peccaverit, quis orabit pro eo » Necnon et qui Filium negaverit coram hominibus, negabitur ab eo coram Patre, et angelis ejus,. Ergo quia nulla venia in Trinitatem conceditur blasphemantibus, omni studio et cautela est providendum, ut ne in brevi quidem parvoque sermone de ea disputantes, labamur. Quia potius si quis hoc volumen legere voluerit, quaesumus, ut mundet se ab omni opere malo, et cogitationibus pessimis: quo possit illuminato corde ea intelligere quae dicuntur, et plenus sanctitate atque sapientia, ignoscere nobis, sicubi voluntatem nostram non implevit effectus, et tantummodo consideret qua mente quid dictum sit, non quibus expressum sit sermonibus. Sicut enim pietatis sensum nobis audaciter juxta nostram conscientiam vindicamus, ita quantum de eo loqui pertinet, venustatem rhetoricam facundiam que, juxta consequentiam textumque sermonis, procul abesse simpliciter confitemur. Studii quippe nostri fuit, de Scripturis sanctis disserentibus, pro intelligere quae scripta sunt, et imperitiam mensuramque nostri non ignorare sermonis.
Let these things suffice for the present, said according to the poverty of our speech, showing my fear at having dared to speak of the Holy Spirit. For whoever blasphemes against him will not be forgiven, neither in this age nor in the age to come; and no mercy or pardon will be reserved for one who has trampled on the Son of God and outraged the Spirit of his grace, in whom he was sanctified. This must be understood of God the Father too. For one who blasphemes against him and acts impiously will be tormented without pardon, with no one interceding with the Lord for him, as it is written: "But one who sins against the Lord God, who will pray for him?" And one who denies the Son before men will be denied by him before the Father and his angels. So, since no pardon is granted to those who blaspheme against the Trinity, every care and caution must be taken so that, discussing it even in a short and small treatise, we do not slip. Rather, if anyone wishes to read this volume, we ask that he cleanse himself from every evil work and from wicked thoughts, so that with an enlightened heart he may understand what is said, and, full of holiness and wisdom, forgive us wherever the result has not fulfilled our wish, and consider only with what intent each thing was said, not in what words it was expressed. For as we boldly claim for ourselves, according to our conscience, a sense of piety, so, as far as speaking of it is concerned, we simply confess that rhetorical charm and eloquence, in the sequence and texture of the discourse, are far from us. For our aim, discussing the holy Scriptures, was to understand what is written, and not to be unaware of the inexperience and measure of our speech.