Letters of Boniface I
The whole work on one page. Select a passage number to open that passage with its notes, Scripture references, and citation.
Chapter 3
3.0PL 20:756b–756 b
Bonifacius episcopus Patroclo, Remigio, Maximo, Hilario, Severo, Valerio, Juliano, Castorio, Leontio, Constantino, Joanni, Montano, Marino, Mauricio, et caeteris episcopis per Gallias et septem provincias constitutis.
Bishop Boniface to Patroclus, Remigius, Maximus, Hilary, Severus, Valerius, Julian, Castorius, Leontius, Constantine, John, Montanus, Marinus, Mauricius, and the other bishops established throughout the Gauls and the Seven Provinces.
3.1PL 20:756b–757 c
Valentinae nos clerici civitatis adierunt, proponentes per libellum crimina, quae Maximum teste tota provincia asserunt commisisse; delegata toties cognitione, illum constituta semper subterfugisse judicia, nec confisum conscientia festinasse, ut si esset innocens, examinatis omnibus purgaretur; quae toties decreta, ex nostrarum quoque chartarum instructione cognovimus. Qui econtrario probavit de se illa quae dicta sunt, qui ad ea confutanda, cum essent innumera, a decessoribus meis provinciali delegata cognitione, conventus, etiam dicitur evitasse, et adesse minime voluisse. Et nullus dubitat, quod ita judicium nocens subterfugit, quemadmodum ut absolvatur qui est innocens quaerit. Sed astuta cavillatio eorum, qui versutis agendum credunt esse consiliis, numquam innocentiae nomen accipiet. Confitetur enim de omnibus, quisquis se subterfugere judicium dilationibus putat. Veniat tamen aliquando ille, qui talis perhibetur, in medium : nec prodest illi, toties latuisse, toties subterfugisse, quem sui actus et commissa, quocumque fugerit, ea quae objiciuntur illi, si vera sunt, crimina persequuntur. Debueram quidem jam nunc dignam, pro ejus accusatis in nostro judicio actibus, qui cognitionem et decretum judicium saepe declinando credidit illudendum, ferre sententiam : at ne aliquis praecocem forsitan judicaret, et sibi qui absens est, licet sit quaesitus a nobis, reservatum esse nihil diceret; maluimus intercapedine temporis data differri, cum hoc etiam ejus accusatores assererent, de suis intentionibus et moribus sic securum Maximum, tanto magis damnanda committere, quanto tardius se constituto judicio praesentaret. Quem Manichaeorum involutum caligine, arguunt turpi secta olim ita, ne eum possit abluere, animum sordidasse, in probationem objectae rei gesta synodalia proferentes; et commissis involutum undique flagitiis, nullum eum sanitatis habuisse respectum. Quem furore suo et insana temeritate ad saecularium quoque judicum tribunalia subditum quaestioni, quod in vili quoque persona turpissimum est, objicerent pervenisse, et homicidii damnatum asserunt, gestis prolatis in medium : et hunc talem post tanta taliaque commissa episcopatus adhuc sibi nomen in suis latibulis vindicare in propriae civitatis infamiam, nimiis doloribus conqueruntur, et sanctum nomen vindicando sibi velle polluere.
The clergy of the city of Valence have approached us, setting out in a petition the crimes which they assert, with the whole province as witness, that Maximus has committed; that, though the hearing was so often delegated, he always evaded the appointed judgments, and did not hasten, trusting in his conscience, so that, if innocent, he might be cleared after everything had been examined; and we have learned from the record of our own papers too that this was so often decreed. He, on the contrary, proved what was said about him, since, when summoned to refute it, though the charges were countless, by the provincial hearing delegated by my predecessors, he is even said to have avoided it and to have been quite unwilling to appear. And no one doubts that the guilty man evades judgment just as the innocent man seeks it in order to be acquitted. But the cunning quibbling of those who think one should act by crafty counsels will never receive the name of innocence. For whoever thinks he can escape judgment by delays confesses to everything. Let the man who is reported to be such come forward at last: it does not profit him to have hidden so often, to have evaded so often, when his acts and offences, the crimes laid against him, if they are true, pursue him wherever he flees. I ought indeed now to have pronounced a fitting sentence for his acts, accused in our judgment, since he thought he could mock the hearing and the decreed judgment by often declining it: but lest anyone perhaps judge it premature, and lest the absent man, though sought by us, say that nothing had been reserved for him, we preferred that it be put off, with an interval of time given; since his accusers also asserted this, that Maximus, thus secure about their charges and about his own conduct, commits things the more worthy of condemnation the later he presents himself before the appointed judgment. They charge that, wrapped in the darkness of the Manichaeans, he once so soiled his soul with that foul sect that it cannot be washed out, bringing synodal proceedings as proof of the charge; and that, wrapped all round in committed crimes, he had no regard for amendment. They charge that in his fury and mad rashness he came even before the tribunals of secular judges and was subjected to torture, which is most shameful even in a low person, and they assert, bringing proceedings forward, that he was condemned for homicide; and they complain with excessive grief that such a man, after so many and such great offences, still claims the name of bishop for himself in his hiding places, to the disgrace of his own city, and wishes to pollute a holy name by claiming it.
3.2PL 20:757c–758 b
Ideoque, fratres charissimi, quia audiendus hic praesentare se noluit, ne convictus forsitan ab accusantibus se clericis, posset digna tandem aliquando, praesentatus episcopali judicio, pronuntiationis congruae feriri sententia; (quamquam illi cum haec edicta fuerit, quae potest hujus nominis esse jactura, qui pudorem numquam habuisse sacerdotii perhibetur, et locum suum ne modico quidem tempore custodisse?) dilationem tamen dedimus, et decrevimus vestrum debere intra provinciam esse judicium, et congregari synodum ante diem kalendarum Novembrium : ut si adesse voluerit, praesens si confidit ad objecta respondeat; si vero adesse neglexerit, dilationem sententiae de absentia non lucretur. Nam manifestum est confiteri cum de crimine, qui indulto et toties delegato judicio purgandi se occasione non utitur. Nihil enim interest, utrum in praesenti examine omnia quae dicta sunt comprobentur, cum ipsa quoque pro confessione procurata toties constet absentia. Nos autem per omnes provincias litteras dirigimus, ne excusationem sibi ignorationis obtendat, ut ad provinciam venire cogatur, et illic se constituto praesentare judicio. Quidquid autem vestra Charitas de hac causa duxerit decernendum, cum ad nos relatum fuerit, nostra, ut condecet, necesse est auctoritate firmetur. Data sub die idus Junias, Monaxio viro clarissimo consule.
And therefore, dearest brothers, since he has not been willing to present himself to be heard, lest, convicted perhaps by the clergy accusing him, he might at last, presented before the episcopal judgment, be struck with the sentence of a fitting pronouncement (though, when this is pronounced against him, what loss of this name can there be for one who is said never to have had the modesty of the priesthood and not to have kept his place even for a little time?), we have nevertheless granted a delay, and have decreed that your judgment ought to be within the province, and that a synod be assembled before the Kalends of November: so that, if he wishes to be present, he may answer the charges in person, if he is confident; but if he neglects to be present, he may not gain a postponement of the sentence from his absence. For it is plain that he confesses to the crime who does not use the opportunity of clearing himself when a judgment has been granted and so often delegated. For it makes no difference whether everything said is proved in a present examination, since his absence, so often contrived, is established as a confession. We are sending letters throughout all the provinces, lest he plead ignorance as an excuse, so that he may be compelled to come to the province and present himself there before the appointed judgment. Whatever your charity thinks should be decreed in this case, when it has been reported to us, must, as is fitting, be confirmed by our authority. Dated on the Ides of June [13 June 419], in the consulship of Monaxius, a most distinguished man.
Chapter 4
4.1PL 20:760a–760 b
Beatus apostolus Petrus, cui arx sacerdotii dominica voce concessa est, in immensum gratulationis extollitur, quoties pervidet concessi sibi honoris a Domino intemeratae se pacis filios habere custodes. Quid enim gaudio debeat majore pensare, quam quod agnoscit acceptae potestatis illaesa jura servari? Vere namque immobile requirit a diversis destinata super negotiis quibusque consultatio fundamentum, quae ejus consulit sedis arcanum, quam constat dignatione petrae spiritalis elatam.
The blessed apostle Peter, to whom the citadel of the priesthood was granted by the Lord’s voice, is exalted beyond measure in rejoicing whenever he sees that he has sons who guard unblemished the peace of the honour granted him by the Lord. For what should he weigh with greater joy than recognizing that the rights of the power he received are kept unharmed? For truly the consultation sent by various people on any matters requires an immovable foundation, when it consults the inner counsel of his see, which is known to have been raised up by the favour of the spiritual rock.
4.2PL 20:760b–760 c
Frequentia igitur, ut scrinii nostri monimenta declarant, ad charitatem tuam ex ejus fonte scripta manarunt, quibus sollicitudinem ecclesiarum per Macedoniam et Achaiam sitarum Fraternitati tuae, quam scimus ecclesiasticam disciplinam canonum notione servare, certum est esse commissam. Nec immerito id ducimus factum. Hanc enim gratiam Dilectioni tuae apostolica sedes officio diligentis impertit. Unde fit, ut Sanctitatem tuam gnaram faciamus hujusce negotii, quod ex ea provincia auribus nostris ingeritur destinatum, cujus prudentiae tuae dudum cura mandata est.
Frequently, then, as the records of our archive show, letters have flowed from his spring to your charity, by which it is certain that the care of the churches situated in Macedonia and Achaea has been entrusted to your brotherhood, which we know keeps church discipline by knowledge of the canons. Nor do we think this was done without reason. For the apostolic see bestows this grace on your love in the office of one who cares. Hence it is that we make your holiness aware of this business, which has been brought to our ears, sent from that province whose care was long ago committed to your prudence.
4.3PL 20:760c–761 a
Corinthii enim olim beati Pauli praedicatione laudati, quorum preces subdendas magis credidimus esse, quam narrandas, Perigenem, sicut jam dudum a sancta synodo super ejus nomine pagina directa testatur, sanctum et instituti optimi qualitate pollentem, civitatis suae non tam accipere quam retinere desiderant sacerdotem. Cujus ordinationis seriem si integro ordine exponendam putavero, fiat necesse est ejus laudis augmentum; et huic nimirum proficiet, si faciamus vel ordinantis, vel ordinati recto tramite mentionem. Quis (??)(??)(??) bitet ejus meritis deputari; quis (??)(??)(??)(??) fuisse divini, ideo hunc a Patrenibus (??)(??) non esse susceptum, et diu super praemissa ecclesia, magna deliberatione suspensum, ut hujus ovilis pastor fieret, in cujus caulis suam a cunabulis transegisset aetatem? Judicia Dei abyssus multa : quod congrue aptamus exemplum, et nemo crederet quod in ordinatoris aliquando locum subrogari posset, quia fuerat ab aliis ordinatus. Non ambigo coelestis tunc istud fuisse sententiae.
For the Corinthians, once praised by the preaching of the blessed Paul, whose prayers we have thought should rather be attached than narrated, desire not so much to receive as to keep as priest of their city Perigenes, a holy man strong in the quality of an excellent way of life, as the letter sent long ago by the holy synod about his name testifies. If I think the course of his ordination should be set out in full order, it must be an increase of his praise; and it will surely profit him if we make mention, in the right way, both of the one who ordained and of the one ordained. Who … doubts that it should be credited to his merits; who … that it was of God that he was therefore not received by the people of Patras, and was long held in suspense, with great deliberation, over the church first assigned, so that he might become shepherd of this fold in whose pens he had spent his life from the cradle? “The judgments of God are a great deep”: we fittingly apply this example; and no one would have believed that he could at some time be put in the place of the one who ordained him, because he had been ordained by others. I do not doubt that this was then a sentence from heaven.
4.4PL 20:761a–761 b
Qua vel consensu qui illic auctoritatem sedis apostolicae praesentabant, eum in nostrorum numerum recipimus : et in eos necesse est vigorem censurae, qui contra nostrum factum post haec nescientibus nostris incitare dicuntur populos, si perstiterint, exseramus. Quod quidem et Dilectionem tuam in eos ex nostra praeceptione facere volumus : ut eorum licentiam, quibus nihil tale commisimus, refrenemus.
By this, or by the consent of those who represented the authority of the apostolic see there, we receive him into the number of our own; and against those who are said, after this, without our people’s knowledge, to be stirring up the peoples against our act, we must put forth the vigour of censure if they persist. We wish your love too to do this against them by our command, so that we may restrain the licence of those to whom we entrusted nothing of the kind.
Chapter 5
5.1PL 20:761b–762 a
Credebamus, post epistolas nostras pro ecclesiasticae disciplinae observatione transmissas, omnibus aditum praesumptionibus praecludendum, cum ad consultationem Dilectionis tuae praebuissemus debitum pro causarum aestimatione responsum; constituentes ea debere servari, quae ecclesiastica exigit disciplina. Sed quantum nunc tuae Sanctitatis nobis relatio patefecit, apud plerosque valuisse quod scripsimus; apud quosdam autem admonitionem nostram inefficacem cognovimus fuisse. Nec hoc Fraternitati tuae possumus imputare, cum te anxium pro commissa tibi ecclesiarum sollicitudine et rebus et litteris sentiamus. Vigilantiae tuae laudamus industriam, qui ne videaris tibi commissa negligere, id non praetermittis litteris indicare, quod sedis apostolicae debeat censura corrigere : hunc te Dei nostri habere professus timorem, quem prudentissime inesse convenit sacerdoti; qui tunc tibi esse poterit gloriosus, si ea quae curae tuae commissa sunt, prodesse ecclesiis fuerimus experti. Intuetur enim te, ut epistolis tuis ipse fideliter es locutus, beatissimus Petrus apostolus oculis suis, qualiter summi rectoris utaris officio. Nec potest tibi esse non proximus, qui pastor dominicarum ovium est perpetuus constitutus; aut aliquam ubivis positam ecclesiam non curare, in quo universalis ecclesiae positum legimus fundamentum.
We believed that after our letters sent for the observance of church discipline the way would be closed to all presumptions, since we had given your love’s consultation the answer due in view of the cases, decreeing that what church discipline requires must be kept. But as your holiness’s report has now revealed to us, what we wrote has prevailed with most; with some, however, we have learned that our admonition was ineffective. Nor can we impute this to your brotherhood, since we perceive from your actions and your letters that you are anxious for the care of the churches entrusted to you. We praise the diligence of your vigilance, since, lest you seem to neglect what is entrusted to you, you do not omit to indicate by letter what the censure of the apostolic see ought to correct: professing to have that fear of our God which it befits most wisely to be in a priest, who will then be able to have glory, if we find that what has been entrusted to your care benefits the churches. For the most blessed apostle Peter, as you yourself have faithfully said in your letter, watches with his own eyes how you use the office of chief ruler. Nor can he fail to be near you, he who has been appointed perpetual shepherd of the Lord’s sheep; nor can he fail to care for any church placed anywhere, in whom we read that the foundation of the universal church was laid.
5.2PL 20:762a–762 b
Te ergo, frater charissime, omnis cura respectat omnium ecclesiarum, quas tibi vice sedis apostolicae a nobis creditas recognosces : ut et prava corrigas, et dissipata componas; etsi quae inter episcopos eveniant causae, sub divini judicii timore distinguas : ut creditis tibi a sede apostolica gubernaculis contra omnes fluctus nascentium procellarum juste et prudenter utaris.
On you, then, dearest brother, rests all the care of the churches, which you will recognize have been entrusted by us to you in the place of the apostolic see: so that you may correct what is crooked and set in order what is scattered; and if any cases arise between bishops, you may decide them under the fear of the divine judgment: so that you may use the helm entrusted to you by the apostolic see justly and prudently against all the waves of rising storms.
5.3PL 20:762b–763 a
In notitiam singulorum, ad quos ante jam scripsimus quem deberent tramitem custodire, nostras te epistolas pertulisse dixisti : quibus debitum se commodare consensum plurimi sacerdotum sacrarum traditionum memores sunt professi; quos fraterna charitate complexi. Tales esse cognoscimus coepiscopum nostrum Adelphium, vel fratrem Perigenem, cui beati sermo concilii jam dudum adstipulator accessit. Ad episcopatus speculam jam vocabat Dei, inquam, sententia, cujus beneficia saepe credimus esse contraria; et in adversum vertimus, quae post recognoscimus profuisse. Quam rem continuat negotii praesentis exemplum. Tristis absque dubio coepiscopus noster Perigenes fuit, cum eum nemo susciperet ordinatum. Nonne huic hoc expediens erat, ut hunc civitate sua Patrenses populi unitae voce contradictionis arcerent? Sed quanto inclinatus fuit, cum eum ordinatum nemo suscepit, tanto sublimior nunc est, cum a suis poscitur, qui ab externis fuerat refutatus. Evidens enim Dei manifestumque judicium, qui cum id temporis voluit praestolari, quo mereretur huic ecclesiae praesidere, in qua et natus asseritur et renatus.
You have said that you delivered our letters to the knowledge of each of those to whom we had already written what course they ought to keep: to which very many priests, mindful of the sacred traditions, professed to lend due consent; whom we have embraced with brotherly charity. We recognize as such our fellow bishop Adelphius and our brother Perigenes, to whom the word of the blessed council came long ago as a supporter. The judgment of God, I say, was already calling him to the watchtower of the episcopate, God whose benefits we often believe to be adverse; and we turn into adversity what we afterwards recognize to have been profitable. The example of the present business continues this. Our fellow bishop Perigenes was no doubt sad when no one received him after he was ordained. Was it not expedient for him that the peoples of Patras kept him from their city with a united voice of opposition? But the lower he was bowed when no one received him after ordination, the more exalted he is now, when he is asked for by his own, who had been rejected by strangers. For it is an evident and manifest judgment of God, who wished him to wait for that time when he would deserve to preside over this church, in which he is said to have been both born and reborn.
5.4PL 20:763a–763 c
Frater charissime, quoniam prudentiae tuae injunctorum vel delegatorum pondus incumbit, petitio supplicum vel diligentiae tuae electae jamdudum vel vicinitatis ratione te respectat. Quam quidem petitionem non absque admiratione perlegimus, propterea quod tuis epistolis privaretur. Omnibus eo, quem res exigunt, ordine celebratis, aliqua ad nos scripta transmittas : nolumus enim coepiscopo Perigeni nostram paginam destinare prius, quam tuas accipiamus epistolas, cujus ordinationi videntur omnia delegata. Accelerabis id agere propter desiderium postulantium. Melius enim nosse dignaris, eos in hanc precem sola, ut arbitror, erga religionem devotione fervere; maxime cum irreprehensibiliter eum asserant per annos innumeros in presbyterii honore durasse, et non indebito saltu, sed ad summum gradatim venisse fastigium. Cui ad plenitudinem confirmationis episcopatus sui hoc solum residet, quod nostros in honore suo necdum suscepit affatus. Intelligere autem tuam non ambigo charitatem hoc non absque admiratione, quod et huic videmur nostram paginam non misisse, nec supplicibus praebuisse responsum. Actum a nobis est, ut et apostolicae sedis auctoritas, et Dilectionis tuae honorificentia servaretur. Data xiii kal. Octobr. Monaxio v. c. consule.
Dearest brother, since the weight of what has been enjoined and delegated rests on your prudence, the petition of the suppliants looks to you, whether because of your diligence, chosen long ago, or because of nearness. We read this petition not without surprise, because it lacked your letter. When everything has been carried out in the order the matters require, send us some letter: for we do not wish to send our page to our fellow bishop Perigenes before we receive your letter, to whom everything concerning his ordination is seen to have been delegated. You will hasten to do this because of the desire of the petitioners. For you deign to know better that they burn in this petition, as I think, only with devotion to religion; especially since they assert that he remained blameless for countless years in the honour of the presbyterate, and came to the highest summit not by an undue leap but step by step. For the fullness of the confirmation of his episcopate only this remains: that he has not yet received our greetings in his honour. I do not doubt that your charity understands that it is not without surprise that we seem neither to have sent our page to him nor to have given an answer to the petitioners. This has been done by us so that both the authority of the apostolic see and the honour of your love might be kept. Dated the thirteenth day before the Kalends of October [19 September 419], in the consulship of Monaxius, a most distinguished man.
Chapter 7
7.1PL 20:766a–767 b
Ecclesiae meae, cui Deus noster meum sacerdotium vobis res humanas regentibus deputavit, cura constringit, ne causis ejus, quamvis adhuc corporis incommoditate detinear, conventus a sacerdotibus universis et clericis, et Christianae plebis perturbationibus agitatus, apud aures Christianissimi principis desim. Si quid enim secus quam oportet eveniat, non vos id facere, qui cuncta aequa moderatione componitis; sed nos, per nostram tacentes desidiam, videbimur quod civitatis quietem et Ecclesiae pacem pervertere valeat admisisse. Cum enim humanis rebus divinae cultor religionis Domino favente praesideas; nostra culpa erit, si non id sub vestra gloria, quam certum est divinis semper rebus animo promptiore favisse, firmo et stabili jure custodiatur, quod per tot annorum seriem et sub illis etiam principibus obtinuit, quos nulla nostrae religionis cura constrinxit, id est ethnicis, et sub vestrae Imperio Clementiae minime quae sunt illicita formidentur. Ipsa enim Ecclesia devotionem tuam, christianissime Imperator, meo quidem sermone, sed suo venerabilis appellat affectu, quam Christus Deus noster, vestri fidus rector et gubernator Imperii, uni desponsatam sibi et intactam virginem servat, ne in eam aliquos patiamini insidiantium procellarum fluctus illidi, et quietam faciem tempestatis insolitae tumore turbari, gloriosissime et tranquillissime Imperator auguste. Ipsa ergo, quae uni desponsata, vestra tamen mater est, Ecclesia hac pietatem vestram legatione, quam suis sacerdotibus commisit, appellat, praeterita praesentiaque repetit. Vobis, inquit, religiose imperantibus, modo tutus est populus, tam fidus Deo, quam tibi, principi christiano. Ecce enim inter ipsa mysteria, inter preces suas, quas pro vestri felicitate dependit Imperii, teste apud quem et de cujus sede agitur sancto Petro, sollicitis pro religionis observantia vocibus clamat : cum sollicita petitione miscetur oratio, ne hos in varias res semel evulsa distrahat a cultu solito, tentatore sollicitante, discordia. Ageret pluribus, princeps christianissime, nisi apud te suarum esset secura causarum, et in oppressionibus idolorum, in haereticorum correctionibus, fide tua, divino cultu pariter cum Imperio semper florente vicisset. Habet refugium, tuae mansuetudinis animum cum religionis veneratione conjunctum : cum quidquid huic proficiat, vos agatis, conferatis fratribus et consacerdotibus meis, probatissimis viris, a me et ab omnibus qui Ecclesiam faciunt istam, ad te legatis : quibus, precamur, sacrae causam religionis prosequentibus, in urbe vestrae mansuetudinis hoc animo, quo postulatis annuitis, in perpetuum statui universalis Ecclesiae consulatis. Data kalendis Julii.
The care of my church, to which our God assigned my priesthood while you rule human affairs, constrains me, though I am still held back by bodily infirmity, not to be absent from the ears of the most Christian prince on its behalf, approached as I am by all the priests and clergy and stirred by the disturbances of the Christian people. For if anything should happen otherwise than it should, it will not seem that you did it, who settle all things with fair moderation, but that we, keeping silent through our sloth, admitted what can overturn the quiet of the city and the peace of the church. For since you, a worshipper of the divine religion, preside over human affairs with the Lord’s favour, it will be our fault if, under your glory, which is known always to have favoured divine things with a readier mind, what held good through so long a course of years, even under those princes whom no care for our religion bound, that is, the heathen, is not kept by firm and stable right, and if, under the rule of your Clemency, unlawful things are not dreaded. For the church itself, most Christian emperor, appeals to your devotion, in my words indeed, but with its own venerable affection; the church which Christ our God, the faithful ruler and governor of your empire, keeps as a virgin betrothed to himself alone and untouched, that you may not allow the waves of plotting storms to dash against it, nor its quiet face to be troubled by the swelling of an unaccustomed tempest, most glorious and most serene emperor Augustus. This church, then, which, though betrothed to one, is yet your mother, appeals to your piety by this embassy which it has committed to its priests, and recalls the past and the present. While you rule religiously, it says, the people is now safe, as faithful to God as to you, a Christian prince. For see, amid the very mysteries, amid the prayers it offers for the happiness of your empire, with Saint Peter as witness, before whom and about whose see the matter is being dealt with, it cries out with anxious voices for the observance of religion: with anxious petition prayer is mingled, that discord, once torn into various factions, may not, at the tempter’s urging, draw them away from their accustomed worship. It would plead at greater length, most Christian prince, were it not secure of its causes before you, and had it not, by your faith, always prevailed in suppressing idols and correcting heretics, with divine worship flourishing together with the empire. It has a refuge: the mind of your gentleness, joined with veneration of religion: since whatever benefits it, you do; confer with my brothers and fellow priests, most approved men, sent to you by me and by all who make up this church: and, as they pursue the cause of sacred religion, we pray that, in the city, with the same mind with which you grant what is asked, you may provide for the state of the universal church for ever. Dated the Kalends of July [1 July 420].
Chapter 12
12.0PL 20:772d–772 d
Bonifacius, episcopus urbis Romae, Hilario episcopo Narbonensi.
Boniface, bishop of the city of Rome, to Hilary, bishop of Narbonne.
12.1PL 20:772d–773 a
Difficile quidem fidem querimoniis commodamus, quarum sacerdotes Domini pulsat intentio, maxime cum eos loquuntur quidpiam contra patrum statuta tentasse : sed frequenter has asserit, sicut nunc, multitudo causantium. Ecce enim, ut charitas tua recognoscit ex subditis, Lutubensis ecclesiae cleri ordo, vel plebis, preces suas et lacrymas ad nos, quantum datur intelligi, magno cum dolore miserunt, dicentes, coepiscopum nostrum Patroclum, sua petitione cessante, in locum decedentis episcopi, nescio quem in aliena provincia praetermisso metropolitano contra patrum regulas ordinasse. Quod nequaquam possumus ferre patienter : quia convenit nos paternarum sanctionum diligentes esse custodes. Nulli etenim videtur incognita synodi constitutio Nicaenae, quae ita praecipit, ut eadem proprie verba ponamus. Per unamquamque provinciam jus metropolitanos singulos habere debere, nec cuiquam duas esse subjectas. Quod illi, quia aliter, credendum non est, servandum sancto Spiritu suggerente sibimet censuerunt.
We do not readily lend credence to complaints whose intent attacks priests of the Lord, especially when they say that they have attempted something against the statutes of the fathers: but often, as now, a multitude of complainants asserts them. For see, as your charity will recognize from the attached documents, the order of the clergy and people of the church of Lodève have sent us their prayers and tears, with great grief, so far as can be understood, saying that our fellow bishop Patroclus, without their petition, ordained someone or other in the place of their deceased bishop, in another’s province, passing over the metropolitan, against the rules of the fathers. This we can by no means bear patiently: for it befits us to be diligent guardians of the fathers’ sanctions. For the constitution of the synod of Nicaea seems unknown to no one, which commands thus, that we may set down its very words: that in each province the metropolitans individually ought to have the right, and no one is to have two subject to him. This they decreed, at the suggestion of the Holy Spirit, was to be kept by themselves, for it is not to be believed otherwise.
12.2PL 20:773a–774 a
Unde, frater charissime, si ita res sunt, et ecclesiam supradictam provinciae tuae limes includit, nostra auctoritate commonitus, quod quidem facere sponte deberes, desideriis supplicantium, et voluntate respecta, ad eumdem locum in quo ordinatio talis celebrata dicitur, metropolitani jure munitus, et praeceptionibus nostris fretus, accede : intelligens arbitrio tuo secundum regulas patrum quaecumque facienda sunt a nobis esse concessa; ita ut peractis omnibus, apostolicae sedi quidquid statueris te referente clarescat, cui totius provinciae ordinationem liquet esse mandatam. Nemo ergo eorum terminos audax temerator excedat, nec aliquis in illorum contumeliam partibus suis, quae sibi non videntur concessa, defendat. Cesset hujusmodi pressa nostra auctoritate praesumptio eorum, qui ultra licitum suae limitem dignitatis extendunt. Quod idcirco dicimus, ut advertat charitas tua, adeo nos canonum praecepta servare, ut ita constitutio quoque nostra definiat, quatenus metropolitani sui unaquaeque provincia in omnibus rebus ordinationem semper exspectet. Data v idus Febr. dominis nostris Honorio xiii et Theodosio x augg. conss.
Therefore, dearest brother, if things are so, and the boundary of your province includes the church mentioned, admonished by our authority to do what you ought to do of your own accord, having regard to the desires and the will of the petitioners, go to the place where such an ordination is said to have been celebrated, fortified by the right of the metropolitan and relying on our instructions: understanding that whatever must be done according to the rules of the fathers has been granted by us to your judgment; so that, when everything is completed, whatever you decide may become clear to the apostolic see by your report, the see to which it is plain that the ordering of the whole province has been entrusted [to you]. Let no bold violator, then, cross their boundaries, nor let anyone defend, to their injury, parts that do not seem to have been granted him. Let the presumption of those who extend themselves beyond the lawful limit of their dignity cease, suppressed by our authority. We say this so that your charity may notice that we keep the precepts of the canons so far that our constitution too determines that each province always awaits the ordination of its own metropolitan in all things. Dated the fifth day before the Ides of February [9 February 422], in the consulship of our lords Honorius for the thirteenth time and Theodosius for the tenth time, Augusti.
Chapter 13
13.1PL 20:774b–775 a
Retro majoribus tuis super provinciis apostolicae sedis injunctum diligenter a tua charitate debet impleri. Causae etenim ecclesiarum per eas provincias positarum pervigili sunt circumspectione curandae. Ita quippe vice sua beatus apostolus Petrus ecclesiae Thessalonicensi cuncta commisit, ut intelligat se sollicitudinem manere multorum : quam minorem facere nova, quae vires habere non possunt, tentamenta non debent. Non est enim eorum cedendum studiis, quos novitas rerum, et indebitae desiderium dignitatis accendit : sed elaborandum est, et Deo nostro favorem praestante certandum, ut quisquis contra licitum nititur, sibi per omnia recognoscat occursum. Quapropter, frater charissime, fretus jam dudum a te auctoritate suscepta, contra inimicas turmas idoneus Dei nostri miles armare. Nihil hic timebis dubii, nihil incerti formidabis eventus. Habes beatum apostolum Petrum, qui ante te pro sua possit vi repugnare. Nolo perturbatione maris conciti terrearis. Fidem quippe, quam in arcano tui pectoris portas, omnibus rebus certum est esse majorem. In nullo te turbo, in nullo penitus procella vexabit. Non patitur ille sedis suae perire privilegium te laborante piscator. Omnis tumor fluctuum, omnis procella cessabit, eo favente nisibus tuis, cui soli mare pervium fuit. Aderit nimirum, et violatores canonum atque ecclesiastici juris inimicos Deo auctore compescet, qui talium mentium semper vota frustratur.
What was enjoined of old on your predecessors concerning the provinces of the apostolic see must be fulfilled diligently by your charity. For the cases of the churches situated in those provinces are to be cared for with watchful attention. For the blessed apostle Peter, in his own stead, so entrusted everything to the church of Thessalonica that it understands that the care of many rests on it: which new attempts, that can have no strength, ought not to make less. For we must not yield to the zeal of those whom novelty and the desire of undue dignity inflame: but we must labour and strive, with our God granting favour, so that whoever strives against what is lawful may find himself opposed in everything. Therefore, dearest brother, relying on the authority you received long ago, arm yourself as a fit soldier of our God against the hostile troops. You will fear nothing doubtful here, you will dread no uncertain outcome. You have the blessed apostle Peter, who can fight before you by his own strength. I do not want you to be frightened by the disturbance of a stirred-up sea. For the faith which you carry in the secret of your breast is certainly greater than all things. In nothing will the whirlwind, in nothing at all will the storm trouble you. That fisherman does not allow the privilege of his see to perish while you labour. All the swelling of the waves, every storm, will cease, with his favour on your efforts, to whom alone the sea was passable. He will surely be present and, God being the author, will restrain the violators of the canons and the enemies of church law, he who always frustrates the wishes of such minds.
13.2PL 20:775a–776 a
In caeteros etiam contumaces jus concessae potestatis exerce. Nullum etenim locum vides a nobis otiosum relictum. Ad Thessalos comminationis et correptionis plenas litteras misimus. Ad synodum, quae dicitur illicite (Corinthi) congreganda de causa fratris nostri et coepiscopi Perigenis, cujus scripsimus statum nulla posse penitus ratione turbari, talia scripta direximus, quibus universi fratres intelligant, primo convenire se citra tuam conscientiam minime debuisse; deinde, de nostro non esse judicio retractandum. Numquam enim licuit de eo rursus, quod semel statutum est ab apostolica sede, tractari. In qua pagina nostra, ut condecuit, honorem debitum tuae servavimus Sanctitati, sicut ejus charitas tua lectione cognoscet.
Exercise the right of the power granted you against the other obstinate men also. For you see that no place has been left idle by us. We have sent the Thessalians a letter full of threat and rebuke. To the synod which is said to be unlawfully assembling (at Corinth) concerning the case of our brother and fellow bishop Perigenes, whose standing we have written can by no means be disturbed, we have sent such a letter as will make all the brothers understand, first, that they ought not to have met without your knowledge; then, that what was our judgment is not to be reconsidered. For it has never been lawful to deal again with what has once been decided by the apostolic see. In that page of ours, as was fitting, we have kept the honour due to your holiness, as your charity will learn by reading it.
13.3PL 20:776a–776 b
Perrevii autem coepiscopi nostri negotium, cujus nobis libellus ab eodem destinatus fecit indicium, cui consacerdotes sui molesti nimis esse dicuntur, ita ut eum ecclesia sua crederent esse pellendum, diligenter audire tuam volumus charitatem, conventis supradictis coepiscopis nostris, quorum se vim sustinere deplorat. Tunc demum, ut intelligant, si quid a se factum est contra consuetudinem, prius esse cassandum, omnibus vestigatis ad nos tua charitas referre maturet; quatenus prolatum a tua fraternitate judicium sententia nostra valeat roborari.
As for the business of our fellow bishop Perrevius, of which the petition he sent us informed us, to whom his fellow priests are said to be very troublesome, so much so that they believe he should be driven out of his church: we wish your charity to hear it diligently, summoning the fellow bishops mentioned, whose violence he laments that he endures. Then at last, so that they may understand that anything they have done against custom must first be annulled, let your charity hasten, when everything has been investigated, to report to us, so that the judgment given by your brotherhood may be strengthened by our sentence.
13.4PL 20:776b–777 a
Sane in epistola Thessalis fratribus destinata id a nobis scriptum volumus recognoscas, Pausianum, Cyriacum atque Calliopum a nostra communione penitus submovendos : ita ut remedium solum interventionis tuae gratiam se habere cognoscant. Maximum autem, quem male tua charitas retulit ordinatum, in totum sacerdotii censemus honore privandum.
Indeed, we wish you to recognize what we have written in the letter sent to the Thessalian brothers: that Pausianus, Cyriacus and Calliopus are to be wholly removed from our communion, so that they may know that their only remedy is the favour of your intervention. As for Maximus, whom your charity reported was wrongly ordained, we decide that he is to be wholly deprived of the honour of the priesthood.
13.5PL 20:777a–777 a
Tuae charitatis est Severum apostolicae sedis notarium, animis acceptissimum nostris, de nostro proprio latere destinatum, peractis omnibus, tota celeritate dimittere; ut gestarum ordinem rerum, eodem festinius revertente, noscamus. Data v idus Martias, Honorio xiii et Theodosio x Augustis consulibus.
It is for your charity, when everything is done, to send back with all speed Severus, notary of the apostolic see, most welcome to our mind, sent from our own side, so that we may learn the course of events when he returns more quickly. Dated the fifth day before the Ides of March [11 March 422], in the consulship of Honorius for the thirteenth time and Theodosius for the tenth time, Augusti.
Chapter 14
14.0PL 20:777a–777 a
Dilectissimis fratribus universis episcopis per Thessaliam constitutis Bonifacius.
Boniface to his most beloved brothers, all the bishops established throughout Thessaly.
14.1PL 20:777b–777 b
Institutio universalis nascentis Ecclesiae de beati Petri sumpsit honore principium, in quo regimen ejus et summa consistit. Ex ejus enim ecclesiastica disciplina per omnes Ecclesias, religionis jam crescente cultura, fonte manavit. Nicaenae synodi non aliud praecepta testantur : adeo ut non aliquid super eum ausa sit constituere, cum videret nihil supra meritum suum posse conferri : omnia denique huic noverat Domini sermone concessa. Hanc ergo Ecclesiis toto orbe diffusis velut caput suorum certum est esse membrorum : a qua se quisquis abscidit, fit Christianae religionis extorris, cum in eadem non coeperit esse compage.
The institution of the universal church at its birth took its beginning from the honour of blessed Peter, in whom its government and its sum consist. For from him, as from a spring, church discipline flowed through all the churches as the practice of religion was already growing. The precepts of the synod of Nicaea testify nothing else: so much so that it did not dare to decree anything over him, since it saw that nothing could be conferred above his merit: in short, it knew that everything had been granted to him by the word of the Lord. It is certain, then, that this [church] is to the churches spread throughout the world as the head of its members: from which whoever cuts himself off becomes an exile from the Christian religion, since he has not begun to be in the same frame.
14.2PL 20:777b–778 a
Audio episcoporum quosdam, apostolico jure contempto, novum quidpiam contra Christi proprie praecepta tentare, cum se ab apostolicae sedis communione, et, ut dicam verius, potestate separare nituntur, eorum petentes auxilium, quos ecclesiasticarum sanctio regularum majoris esse non dedit potestatis. Leguntur etenim praecepta majorum; et quibus in Ecclesias juris aliquid dederint invenimus. Jam temerator est ecclesiasticae disciplinae, quisquis in ejus leges, cum sibi nihil debeatur, irrepit, ea sibimet vindicando, quae sibi a patribus negata videantur.
I hear that some of the bishops, despising apostolic right, are attempting something new, properly against the precepts of Christ, since they are striving to separate themselves from the communion, and to speak more truly, from the power, of the apostolic see, seeking the help of those to whom the sanction of the church’s rules did not give greater power. For the precepts of the elders are read; and we find to whom they gave any right over the churches. He is already a violator of church discipline who, when nothing is owed him, creeps into its laws, claiming for himself what is seen to have been denied him by the fathers.
14.3PL 20:778a–778 a
Accipite ergo admonitionem et correptionem nostram, ex quibus unam pontificibus, alteram dissidentibus exhibemus. Nam ideo ait Apostolus : Quid vultis, in virga veniam ad vos, an in charitate et in spiritu mansuetudinis? Scitis enim beato Petro utrumque possibile, id est in mansuetudine mites, in virga superbos arguere.
Receive, then, our admonition and our rebuke, of which we show the one to the bishops, the other to those who dissent. For this is why the Apostle says: “What do you wish? Shall I come to you with a rod, or in love and in a spirit of gentleness?” For you know that both are possible to blessed Peter, that is, to correct the gentle in gentleness and the proud with the rod.
14.4PL 20:778a–779 a
Ergo servate honorem debitum capiti : quia nolumus ut intra se membra decertent, ita ut tendatur eorum ad nos usque certamen; dum fratrem et coepiscopum nostrum Rufum dignum ducitis contemptu : cui nihil novum auctoritas nostra concedit, sequens priorum gratiam, qua huic cura ecclesiarum saepe videtur injuncta. Quod factum ita intemeratum servari volumus in futurum, sicut a patribus hujus dispositionis forma servata est. Non decet fratres alterius dignitate morderi. Certe si in quoquam ejus supra debitum fuit visa correptio, quoniam ideo tenet sedes apostolica principatum, ut querelas omnium libere acceptet; interpellari nos super hoc missa legatione convenerat, quos curam omnium rerum manere videatis. Cesset novella praesumptio. Nemo audeat sperare quod non licet. Nullus ea quae sunt a patribus gesta, et per tantum temporum custodita, temerare contendat. Ordinationi nostrae pareat quisquis se episcopum recognoscit. Episcopos per Illyricum citra conscientiam coepiscopi nostri Rufi nullus ordinare praesumat, etc. Data v idus Martias, Honorio xiii et Theodosio x Augustis consulibus.
Keep, therefore, the honour due to the head: for we do not wish the members to fight among themselves so that their contest reaches all the way to us, while you think our brother and fellow bishop Rufus worthy of contempt, to whom our authority grants nothing new, following the favour of our predecessors, by which the care of the churches is seen often to have been enjoined on him. We wish this arrangement to be kept unblemished in the future, as the form of this disposition has been kept by the fathers. It does not befit brothers to be stung by another’s dignity. Certainly, if his rebuke was seen in anyone’s case to go beyond what was due, since the apostolic see holds the primacy precisely so that it may freely accept the complaints of all, it would have been fitting to appeal to us about this by sending an embassy, since you see that the care of all things rests on us. Let the novel presumption cease. Let no one dare to hope for what is not lawful. Let no one strive to violate what was done by the fathers and kept through so long a time. Let whoever recognizes himself a bishop obey our ordinance. Let no one presume to ordain bishops throughout Illyricum without the knowledge of our fellow bishop Rufus, etc. Dated the fifth day before the Ides of March, in the consulship of Honorius for the thirteenth time and Theodosius for the tenth time, Augusti.
Chapter 15
15.0PL 20:779a–779 a
Dilectissimis fratribus Rufo et caeteris episcopis per Macedoniam, Achaiam, Thessaliam, Epirum veterem, Epirum novam, Praevalin et Daciam constitutis, Bonifacius.
Boniface to his most beloved brothers Rufus and the other bishops established throughout Macedonia, Achaea, Thessaly, Old Epirus, New Epirus, Praevalis and Dacia.
15.1PL 20:779a–779 b
Manet beatum apostolum Petrum per sententiam dominicam universalis Ecclesiae ab hoc sollicitudo suscepta; quippe quam, Evangelio teste, in se noverit esse fundatam : nec umquam ejus honor vacuus potest esse curarum; cum certum sit summam rerum ex ejus deliberatione pendere. Quae res animum meum usque ad Orientis loca quae per ipsam sollicitudinem quodam modo videmus, extendunt. Indesinenter enim ab unoquoque illinc veniente percontor de pace fratrum, id est, de quiete pontificum, quae solet, quoties diabolus huic invidet, alicujus praesumptione turbari. Cum igitur ad nos ordine suo cuncta servari fama nunc usque detulerit, vehementer mirati sumus ejus rei stupentes, ut poscebat ratio relatorum, quam in injuriam patrum intentio novella tentavit.
The care of the universal church, received from the Lord’s sentence, rests with the blessed apostle Peter; for he knows, with the gospel as witness, that it is founded on him; nor can his honour ever be empty of cares, since it is certain that the sum of things hangs on his deliberation. This matter extends my mind as far as the regions of the East, which in a way we see through this very care. For I ask without ceasing of everyone who comes from there about the peace of the brothers, that is, about the quiet of the bishops, which is usually disturbed by someone’s presumption whenever the devil envies it. Since, then, report had until now brought us that everything was kept in its order, we were greatly surprised, astonished at the thing, as the account of the reports demanded, which a novel attempt has ventured to the injury of the fathers.
15.2PL 20:779c–780 b
Certo enim cognovimus indice, apud Corinthum, quod exagitati dicimus, synodum congregandam super ejus discutiendo statu, quem Corinthiis apostolica sedes, examinatis omnibus atque discussis, constituit sacerdotem; secuta Dei voluntatem, quae hunc ipsum, quantum docetur dilationibus temporum, ejus ovilis, in quo creverat et cui creverat, voluit esse pastorem. Cujus ordinationis si vestra esset charitas ignara, libenter ab origine sua quae sunt in praeterito de eo gesta retexerem; ut his, quorum aspectus negotii ejus non per ignorantiam, sed per studium involvit obscurum, manifestatione clareret, sententiam de eo specialiter fuisse divinam, qua, ut diximus, Ecclesiae Corinthiorum velut alumnum suum judicium coeleste servavit. Quam rem omnium civium et clericorum a nobis oppido postulavit assensus. Nec tamen id abrupte praeceptio nostra constituit : sed, ut ecclesiastica disciplina poscebat, diligentius fratrem et coepiscopum nostrum Rufum negotii jussimus interiora rimari, et petitionis summam sua de proximo moderatione pensare; ut nihil immaturum ab hac sede fieri videretur, quae aliorum praesumptiones saepe compressit. Ad nos post aliquanti temporis spatium super hoc praedicti episcopi nostri (Rufi), quae praemissis desideriis convenirent, scripta venerunt : quorum evidentissimam rationem secuti, dedimus hunc Ecclesiae illius esse pontificem, in qua per singulos honorum gradus praeteritam quoquo transegisset aetatem.
For we have learned from a sure informant that at Corinth, which we say has been stirred up, a synod is to be assembled to discuss the standing of him whom the apostolic see, after everything was examined and discussed, appointed priest for the Corinthians; following the will of God, which willed this very man, as far as the delays of time show, to be shepherd of the fold in which he had grown up and for which he had grown. If your charity were ignorant of his ordination, I would gladly unfold from its origin what was done about him in the past, so that it might become clear by manifestation to those whose view of his business is wrapped in darkness not through ignorance but through partisanship, that the sentence about him was specially divine, by which, as we said, the heavenly judgment kept him for the church of the Corinthians as its own nursling. This the assent of all the citizens and clergy earnestly asked of us. Yet our command did not decree it abruptly: but, as church discipline required, we ordered our brother and fellow bishop Rufus to search out more carefully the inner parts of the business and weigh the substance of the petition with his own moderation from nearby; so that nothing premature might seem to be done by this see, which has often suppressed the presumptions of others. After some time, letters came to us about this from our bishop mentioned (Rufus), saying that they agreed with the desires set out before: following their most evident reasoning, we gave him as bishop to that church in which he had spent his past life through the several grades of honours.
15.3PL 20:780b–781 a
Quam ad rem faciendam memorato episcopo mea directa secunda protinus, quae presbyterio universo complicuit, auctoritate mundavi, retro majores secutus qui Ecclesiam Thessalonicensem sibi semper familiarem et in collegii charitate famulantem, dignam, sicut fides asserit scriniorum, hoc honore duxerunt. Quem fratri Rufo apostolicae etiam in posterum gratia sedis indulget; sequax Domini, qui exaltat humiliatos, et humiliat semper elatos; dum illis gratiam tribuit, his resistit.
To accomplish this I directed my [letter] at once to the bishop mentioned, … and confirmed by my authority, following my predecessors, who, as the record of the archives affirms, held the church of Thessalonica, always close to them and serving in the charity of the college, worthy of this honour. This the favour of the apostolic see grants to brother Rufus for the future also; following the Lord, who exalts the humbled and always humbles the exalted, while he gives grace to the former and resists the latter.
15.4PL 20:781a–781 b
Quantum est ergo humilitatis munus, quod gratiae divinae lance pensatur? Et quanta est poena superbiae, cui proprie totius mundi Dominus et rector obsistit? Melius autem Fraternitati vestrae intelligendum relinquo, quis humilitatis, et quis superbiae sit magister. Sed absit hoc a Domini sacerdotibus, ut in hunc aliquis eorum cadat reatum, ut, nova quidpiam usurpatione tentando, inimica sibi faciat scita majorum : aemulum se illum specialiter habere cognoscens, apud quem Christus noster sacerdotii summam locavit. In cujus contumeliam quisquis insurgit, habitator coelestium non poterit esse regnorum. Tibi, inquit, dabo claves regni coelorum, in quae nullus sine gratia janitoris intrabit. Tu es, inquit, Petrus, et super hanc petram aedificabo Ecclesiam meam. Quicumque igitur cupit etiam ante Deum nostrum sacerdotii dignitate censeri; quoniam ad Deum Petro suscipiente pervenitur, in quo Ecclesiam, sicut supra memoravimus, universalem certum est esse fundatam, debet esse mitis et humilis corde : ne incipiat discipulus contumax illius, cujus superbiam imitatus est, poenam subire doctoris.
How great, then, is the gift of humility, which is weighed on the scale of divine grace? And how great is the punishment of pride, which the Lord and ruler of the whole world specially opposes? I leave it rather for your brotherhood to understand who is the master of humility and who of pride. But far be it from the Lord’s priests that any of them fall into this guilt, so that, by attempting something by novel usurpation, he makes the decrees of the elders hostile to himself: knowing that he has as his special rival him with whom our Christ placed the sum of the priesthood. Whoever rises up to insult him cannot be a dweller in the heavenly kingdoms. “To you,” he says, “I will give the keys of the kingdom of heaven,” into which no one will enter without the favour of the doorkeeper. “You are Peter,” he says, “and on this rock I will build my church.” Whoever, then, desires to be counted worthy of the dignity of the priesthood before our God also, since one comes to God with Peter receiving him, on whom, as we mentioned above, it is certain that the universal church is founded, ought to be meek and humble of heart: lest, a contumacious disciple of him whose pride he imitated, he begin to undergo the punishment of his teacher.
15.5PL 20:781c–782 b
Congregatur ergo, ut redeamus ad causam hujus injuriae, synodus cujus dilecto consultum semper superhabens concilii recognoscat arcanum : et fiet, quod quidem fieri per regulas omnino non poterit, fratris et coepiscopi nostri Perigenis honor dubius et incertus, quem in sede Ecclesiae supradictae nostra sententia collocavit. Quis ergo hunc rudis et peregre fortasse nunc demum rediens accusator incessit? Quis certe antistitum, ut fratrum conveniret turba, praecepit, lectis epistolis nostris? Quoniam locus exigit, si placet recensere canonum sanctiones, reperietis quae sit post Ecclesiam Romanam secunda sedes, quaeve sit tertia. A quibus ideo ita rerum videtur ordo distinctus, ut se Ecclesiarum pontifices caeterarum, sub uno tamen eodemque sacerdotio, habere cognoscant quibus charitate servata propter ecclesiasticam disciplinam debeant esse subjecti. Et quidem haec sententia canonum a vetustate duravit, ut nunc usque, Christo nostro favente, perdurat. Nemo umquam apostolico culmini, de cujus judicio non licet retractari, manus obvios audacter intulit : nemo in hoc rebellis exstitit, nisi qui de se voluit judicari. Servant Ecclesiae magnae praedictae per canones dignitates, Alexandrina et Antiochena, habentes ecclesiastici juris notitiam. Servant, inquam, statuta majorum, in omnibus deferentes, et ejus vicissitudinem recipientes gratiae, quam se in Domino, qui pax nostra est, nobis debere cognoscunt.
A synod is being assembled, then, to return to the cause of this injury, which … the hidden purpose of the council; and there will come about, what can by no means be done according to the rules, that the honour of our brother and fellow bishop Perigenes, whom our sentence placed in the see of the church mentioned, will be doubtful and uncertain. Who then is this accuser, raw and perhaps only now returning from abroad, who assails him? Which of the bishops, certainly, ordered that a crowd of brothers should assemble, after our letters had been read? Since the place requires it, if you please to review the sanctions of the canons, you will find what is the second see after the Roman church, and which is the third. By them the order of things is seen to have been so distinguished that the bishops of the other churches, under one and the same priesthood, may know to whom, keeping charity, they ought to be subject for the sake of church discipline. And indeed this sentence of the canons has lasted from antiquity, as it lasts until now, with our Christ’s favour. No one has ever boldly raised his hands against the apostolic summit, whose judgment may not be reconsidered: no one has been a rebel in this except one who wished to be judged about himself. The great churches mentioned, Alexandria and Antioch, keep their dignities through the canons, having knowledge of church law. They keep, I say, the statutes of the elders, deferring in all things, and receiving in return that grace which they know they owe to us in the Lord, who is our peace.
15.6PL 20:782b–783 b
Sed quia res postulat, approbandum documentis est, maximas Orientalium Ecclesias in magnis negotiis, in quibus opus esset disceptatione majore, sedem semper consuluisse Romanam, et quoties usus exegit, ejus auxilium postulasse. Sanctae memoriae Athanasius et Petrus, Alexandrinae sacerdotes Ecclesiae, hujus sedis auxilium postularunt. Cum Antiochena Ecclesia per multum temporis laboraret, ita ut fierent illinc propter hoc ipsum saepe discursus, primo sub Meletio, postea sub Flaviano, apostolicam sedem manifestum est esse consultam. Ad cujus auctoritatem post multa, quae ab Ecclesia nostra gesta sunt, nemini dubium est Flavianum communionis gratiam recepisse; qua in perpetuum caruerat, nisi hinc super hoc scripta manassent. Clementissimae recordationis princeps Theodosius Nectarii ordinationem propter ea, quia in nostra notione non esset, habere non existimans firmitatem, missis e latere suo aulicis cum episcopis, formatam huic a sede Romana dirigi regulariter depoposcit, quae ejus sacerdotium roboraret. Ante breve tempus, id est, sub praedecessore meo beatae recordationis Innocentio, Orientalium Ecclesiarum pontifices, dolentes se a beati Petri communione sejunctos, per legatos pacem, sicut charitas vestra retinet, poposcerunt. Quo tempore apostolica sedes omnia non difficulter indulsit, illi parens magistro qui ait : Si cui autem aliquid donastis, et ego; nam et ego si quid donavi propter vos in persona Christi : ut non possideamur a Satana; non enim ignoramus versutias ejus : id est, quia semper dissensione laetatur.
But since the matter requires it, it must be proved by documents that the greatest churches of the East, in great matters in which there was need of a greater discussion, have always consulted the Roman see, and, whenever need required, asked for its help. Athanasius and Peter of holy memory, priests of the church of Alexandria, asked for the help of this see. When the church of Antioch laboured for a long time, so that journeys were often made from there on this very account, it is plain that the apostolic see was consulted, first under Meletius, later under Flavian. No one doubts that, by its authority, after many things done by our church, Flavian received the grace of communion, which he would have lacked for ever had letters on this matter not flowed from here. The prince Theodosius of most clement memory, thinking that the ordination of Nectarius did not have firmness because it was not within our knowledge, sent courtiers from his side with bishops and asked that a letter of communion be sent to him by the Roman see in due form, to strengthen his priesthood. A short time ago, that is, under my predecessor Innocent of blessed memory, the bishops of the Eastern churches, grieving that they were separated from the communion of blessed Peter, asked for peace through legates, as your charity remembers. At that time the apostolic see granted everything without difficulty, obeying that master who says: “If you have forgiven anyone anything, I also; for if I have forgiven anything, it was for your sake in the person of Christ, so that we may not be possessed by Satan; for we are not ignorant of his devices”: that is, because he always rejoices in dissension.
15.7PL 20:783b–784 a
Quoniam igitur ad probandam veritatem arbitror quae diximus, fratres charissimi, exempla sufficere, quamvis plura vestri notione teneantur; absque fraternitatis injuria conventui vestro volumus his litteris obviatum, quas a nobis per Severum, apostolicae sedis notarium, animis acceptissimum nostris, e nostro latere destinatum videatis esse directas, convenientes, ut condecet, fratres, nequis, volens in nostra communione durare, fratris et coepiscopi nostri Perigenis iterum ad discutiendum in medium nomen adducat : cujus sacerdotium apostolus Petrus semel jam Spiritus sancti suggestione firmavit, nihil huic relinquens in posterum quaestionis, cui, dum constitueretur a nobis per ejus temporis spatium quo vacavit, nihil omnino constet objectum. Cesset accusatio, cujus invidiam probamus auctorem. Solvatur machina falsitatis in eum compositae; quia ad sacerdotium, Dei nostri et omnium bonorum favore, pervenit.
Since, then, I think the examples we have given suffice to prove the truth, dearest brothers, though more are held in your knowledge, we wish, without injury to the brotherhood, to oppose your assembly by this letter, which you see has been sent by us through Severus, notary of the apostolic see, most welcome to our mind, sent from our side; admonishing you, brothers, as is fitting, that no one who wishes to remain in our communion bring the name of our brother and fellow bishop Perigenes again into the open for discussion: whose priesthood the apostle Peter has already once confirmed at the suggestion of the Holy Spirit, leaving no question about it for the future, since it is clear that nothing at all was charged against him when he was appointed by us during the time the see was vacant. Let the accusation cease, whose author we prove to be envy. Let the machine of falsehood built against him be dismantled; for he came to the priesthood with the favour of our God and of all good men.
15.8PL 20:784a–784 b
Sane quoniam servandus accusatori locus est, ne audentiam penitus incitare videamur, si quid ab eodem postquam episcopus nostris est auctoritatibus constitutus, contra disciplinam et propositum sacerdotii fertur admissum, coepiscopus noster Rufus, cui ad vicem nostram cuncta committimus, cum ceteris fratribus quos ipse delegerit, negotium curabit audire; ad nostram relaturus omnia notionem, quaecumque cognitioni ejus rerum cursus et ordo monstrant.
Indeed, since a place must be kept for an accuser, lest we seem to provoke audacity altogether, if anything is reported to have been committed by him against discipline and the purpose of the priesthood after he was appointed bishop by our authority, our fellow bishop Rufus, to whom we entrust everything in our stead, will take care to hear the business with the other brothers whom he himself chooses; he will report to our knowledge whatever the course and order of things show to his inquiry.
15.9PL 20:784b–784 c
Illud etiam, quoniam auctoritas nostra commonitione solita vacare non debet, hortamur et repetito saepius sermone praecipimus, ut in omnibus huic viro obedientiam dispositionibus commodetis. Nullus, ut frequenter diximus, alicujus ordinationem citra ejus conscientiam celebrare praesumat, cui, ut supra dictum est, vice nostra cuncta committimus. Sibi certe hujus praesumptionis auctores imputabunt in posterum, cum se viderint apostolicae charitatis extorres. Data v idus Martias, Honorio xiii et Theodosio x Augustis consulibus.
This too, since our authority ought not to lack its customary admonition, we urge and command with words often repeated: that you lend obedience to this man in all his dispositions. Let no one, as we have often said, presume to celebrate anyone’s ordination without the knowledge of him to whom, as was said above, we entrust everything in our stead. The authors of this presumption will certainly have themselves to blame in the future, when they see themselves exiles from apostolic charity. Dated the fifth day before the Ides of March [11 March 422], in the consulship of Honorius for the thirteenth time and Theodosius for the tenth time, Augusti.