Psalm against the Party of Donatus
The whole work on one page. Select a passage number to open that passage with its notes, Scripture references, and citation.
Chapter 1
1CSEL 51:3lines 1–13
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Abundantia peccatorum solet fratres conturbare. propter hoc dominus noster uoluit nos praemonere comparans regnum caelorum reticulo misso in mare congreganti multos pisces omne genus hinc et inde. quos cum traxissent ad litus, tunc coeperunt separare, bonos in uasa miserunt, reliquos malos in mare. quisquis nouit euangelium, recognoscat cum timore. uidet reticulum ecclesiam, uidet hoc saeculum mare; genus autem mixtum piscis iustus est cum peccatore; saeculi finis est litus: tunc est tempus separare; qui modo retia ruperunt, multum dilexerunt mare; uasa sunt sedes sanctorum, quo non possunt peruenire.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. The abundance of sins is wont to trouble the brothers. For this reason our Lord willed to warn us beforehand, comparing the kingdom of heaven to a net cast into the sea, gathering many fish of every kind from here and there. When they had drawn them to the shore, then they began to sort them: the good they put into vessels, the rest, the bad, into the sea. Whoever knows the gospel, let him recognize it with fear. He sees that the net is the church, he sees that this world is the sea; the mixed kind of fish is the righteous with the sinner; the world’s end is the shore: then is the time to sort; those who have now broken the nets have loved the sea too much; the vessels are the seats of the saints, where they cannot come.
Chapter 14
14CSEL 51:3lines 14–26–4
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Bonus auditor fortasse quaerit, qui ruperint rete. homines multum superbi, qui iustos se dicunt esse. sic fecerunt (et) scissuram et altare contra altare. diabolo se tradiderunt, cum pugnant de traditione et crimen quod commiserunt in alios uolunt transferre. ipsi tradiderunt libros et nos audent accusare, ut peius committant scelus quam commiserunt et ante. qui possent causam librorum excusare de timore, quia Petrus Christum negauit, dum terreretur de morte, modo quo pacto excusabunt factum altare contra altare et pace Christi conscissa spem reponunt in homine? quod persecutio non fecit, ipsi fecerunt in pace.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. A good listener perhaps asks who broke the net. Men very proud, who say that they are righteous. So they made both a split and altar against altar. They handed themselves over to the devil when they fight about the handing over, and the crime that they committed they want to transfer onto others. They themselves handed over the books, and they dare to accuse us, so as to commit a worse crime than they committed even before. Those who could have excused the matter of the books as done from fear, since Peter denied Christ while he was terrified of death, now, how will they excuse the setting up of altar against altar, and, with Christ’s peace torn apart, putting their hope in a man? What persecution did not do, they themselves did in peace.
Chapter 27
27CSEL 51:4lines 27–38
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Custos noster, deus magne, tu nos potes liberare a pseudoprophetis istis, qui nos quaerunt deuorare. maledictum cor lupinum contegunt ouina pelle. nomen iusti ouina pellis, schisma est in lupino corde. qui non nouerunt scripturas, hos solent circumuenire; audiunt enim 'traditores' et nesciunt quid gestum est ante. quibus si dicam: 'probate', non habent quid respondere. suis se dicunt credidisse: dico ego mentitos esse; quia et nos credidimus nostris, qui eos dicunt tradidisse. uis nosse qui dicant falsum? qui non sunt in unitate. olim iam causa finita est, quod uos non statis in pace.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Our guardian, great God, you can deliver us from these false prophets, who seek to devour us. They cover an accursed wolfish heart with a sheep’s skin. The name of the righteous is the sheep’s skin; schism is in the wolfish heart. Those who do not know the Scriptures they are wont to deceive; for they hear ‘traitors’ and do not know what was done before. If I say to them, ‘Prove it’, they have nothing to answer. They say they believed their own people: I say those lied; for we too believed our own, who say that they handed over. Do you want to know who speak falsely? Those who are not in unity. The case was closed long ago; the trouble is that you do not stand in peace.
Chapter 39
39CSEL 51:4lines 39–51–5
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Dixerunt maiores nostri et libros fecerunt inde, qui tunc causam cognouerunt, quo recens possent probare: erant quidam traditores librorum de sancta lege episcopi de Numidia et non quilibet de plebe. cum Carthaginem uenissent episcopum ordinare, inuenerunt Caecilianum iam ordinatum in sua sede. irati sunt, quia ipsi non potuerunt ordinare. erant Botrus et Caelestius hostes Caeciliano ualde, impii fures superbi, de quibus longum est referre. iunxerunt se simul omnes crimen in illum conflare, dicunt ordinatorem eius sanctos libros tradidisse. sic pacis retia ruperunt et errant modo per mare.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Our forebears spoke, and wrote books about it, they who heard the case then, when they could prove it while it was fresh: there were certain traitors of the books of the holy law, bishops from Numidia, and not just anyone from the common people. When they had come to Carthage to ordain a bishop, they found Caecilian already ordained in his own see. They were angry because they themselves had not been able to ordain. There were Botrus and Caelestius, bitter enemies of Caecilian, impious, thieves, proud, of whom it would be long to tell. They all joined together to stir up a charge against him; they say that his ordainer had handed over the holy books. So they broke the nets of peace and now wander through the sea.
Chapter 52
52CSEL 51:5lines 52–64
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Ecce quam bonum et iocundum fratres in unum habitare! audite uocem prophetae, ut sitis in unitate. crimen nobis quis probauit antiquum de traditione? quis obiecit in iudicio? qui sederunt iudicare? quibus testibus conuicit, quis ausus est affirmare? sed hoc libenter finxerunt, quod se nouerant fecisse. quia fama iam loquebatur de librorum traditione, sed qui fecerant latebant in illa perturbatione, inde alios infamarunt, ut se ipsos possent celare. per illos ceteri errarunt principes ex ipsa parte, quia non credere collegis putauerunt sibi turpe. iam, fratres, finiatur error et simus in unitate.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Behold how good and how pleasant it is for brothers to dwell in one! Hear the voice of the prophet, so that you may be in unity. Who has proved against us the old crime of handing over? Who charged it in a court? Who sat to judge? By what witnesses did he convict? Who dared to affirm it? But this they gladly invented, because they knew they had done it themselves. For rumour was already talking about the handing over of the books, but those who had done it were hidden in that confusion; so they defamed others, in order to conceal themselves. Through them the other leaders of that same party went astray, because they thought it shameful not to believe their colleagues. Now, brothers, let the error be ended, and let us be in unity.
Chapter 65
65CSEL 51:5lines 65–77–6
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Fecerunt quod uoluerunt tunc in illa caecitate. non iudices consederunt, non sacerdotes de more, quo solent in magnis causis congregati iudicare, non accusator et reus steterunt in quaestione, non testis, non documentum, quo possent crimen probare, sed furor dolus tumultus, qui regnant in falsitate. proferantur nobis gesta, quae in concilio solent esse, uideamus quae res coegit fieri altare contra altare. si malus erat sacerdos, deponendus erat ante, si non poterat deponi, tolerandus intra rete, sicut modo toleratis tam multos malos aperte, et qui fertis pio furore, ferretis unum pro pace.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. They did what they wanted then, in that blindness. No judges sat together, no bishops according to custom, as they are wont to assemble and judge in great cases; no accuser and defendant stood in the inquiry, no witness, no document by which they could prove the crime, but rage, deceit, uproar, which reign in falsehood. Let the proceedings be produced for us, which are usually kept in a council; let us see what thing forced altar to be set against altar. If the bishop was bad, he should have been deposed first; if he could not be deposed, he should have been tolerated within the net, just as you now openly tolerate so many bad men; and you who bear them with pious rage would have borne one for the sake of peace.
Chapter 78
78CSEL 51:6lines 78–90
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Gaudium magnum esset nobis, si tunc nolletis errare; sed si tunc non uisum est uerum, uel nunc experti uidete. multos nunc habetis prauos, qui uobis displicent ualde, nec tamen hos separatis a uestra communione. non dico de illis peccatis, quae potestis et negare: fustes ignes mortes dico, quae committunt uestri in luce, et tamen suffertis illos uel errore uel timore. quantum erat, ferrent unum patres uestri pro unitate, si tantus erat tumultus, ut non possent degradare. adde quod innocens erat et nil poterant probare. sed ne crimen quaereretur, ubi se uidebant esse, finxerunt se nimis iustos, cum totum uellent turbare.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. It would be a great joy to us if you had not been willing to go astray then; but if the truth was not seen then, at least now, having learned by experience, see it. You now have many crooked men who greatly displease you, and yet you do not separate them from your communion. I do not speak of those sins which you can even deny: clubs, fires, deaths, I mean, which your people commit in broad daylight, and yet you put up with them, from error or from fear. How small a thing it would have been for your fathers to bear one man for unity, if the uproar was so great that they could not degrade him. Add that he was innocent, and they could prove nothing. But so that the crime should not be looked for where they saw it lay, they made themselves out to be exceedingly righteous, since they wanted to throw everything into confusion.
Chapter 91
91CSEL 51:6lines 91–103–7
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Honores uanos qui quaerit, non uult cum Christo regnare, sicut princeps huius mali, de cuius uocantur parte. nam Donatus tunc uolebat Africam totam obtinere; tunc iudices transmarinos petiit ab imperatore. sed haec tam iusta petitio non erat de caritate. hoc ipsa ueritas clamat, quam uolo modo referre. nam consensit imperator, misit qui sederent Romae sacerdotes, qui tunc possent Caecilianum cum illo audire. dicta causa est, nil probatum est: ausus est et appellare et post collegarum sedem audiri ab imperatore. hinc petitio illa probatur non esse de caritate. deinde ubique uictus coepit christianos rebaptizare.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Whoever seeks empty honours does not want to reign with Christ, like the leader of this evil, from whose party they are named. For Donatus then wanted to hold all Africa; then he asked the emperor for judges from overseas. But this so righteous petition did not come from love. The truth itself cries this out, which I now wish to relate. For the emperor consented and sent men to sit at Rome, bishops who could then hear Caecilian with him. The case was pleaded, nothing was proved: he dared even to appeal, and after the court of his colleagues to be heard by the emperor. From this it is proved that that petition was not from love. Then, beaten everywhere, he began to rebaptize Christians.
Chapter 104
104CSEL 51:7lines 104–116
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Iustitiam sequi si uultis, totam causam cogitate. quod postea fecit Donatus, factum quare non est ante? dissentiebant sacerdotes in tota Africana parte: sacerdotes transmarini possent inde iudicare. quid cucurristis ad schisma et altare contra altare, ut, quod postea iudicatum est, iam non possetis audire et a iudicibus uestris cogeremini appellare, dum uultis erroris regnum quoquo modo confirmare? et nunc et uos totum noscitis, sed fingitis uos nescire, et cum uos ueritas urget, patres dicitis errasse, quasi uos aliquis uetet iam recedere ab errore. sed superbia uos ligauit in cathedra pestilentiae.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. If you wish to follow justice, consider the whole case. What Donatus did later, why was it not done before? The bishops disagreed throughout the whole region of Africa: bishops from overseas could have judged it. Why did you run to schism and altar against altar, so that what was judged later you could no longer hear, and were forced to appeal from your own judges, while you wish by any means to establish the reign of error? And now you too know the whole of it, but pretend not to know, and when the truth presses you, you say your fathers erred, as if anyone forbade you now to withdraw from error. But pride has bound you in the seat of pestilence.
Chapter 117
117CSEL 51:8lines 117–129
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Karitatem Christi qui habet, pacem non potest odisse. uel uos iam, populi, audite et nobiscum concordate, qui non tenetis cathedram, pro qua pugnetis iniuste. si modo episcopi uestri ex una aliqua regione haberent inter se litem, quos uelletis iudicare nisi alterarum regionum qui non essent de ipsa lite? sed cum discussissent causam, pronuntiarent pro una parte, numquam communicaretis qui illis nollent consentire. quare ergo communicastis istis, qui hoc fecerunt ante? nam et ipsi non consenserunt transmarinorum sententiae, qui pro nobis iudicarunt; nam nobis iunguntur hodie. si iudex Christus hoc dicat, quid habetis respondere?
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Whoever has the love of Christ cannot hate peace. You at least, O peoples, listen now and agree with us, you who do not hold a bishop’s chair for which to fight unjustly. If now your bishops from some one region had a dispute among themselves, whom would you want to judge except men of other regions who were not part of the dispute? But when these had examined the case and pronounced for one side, you would never communicate with those who refused to agree with them. Why then did you communicate with these men, who did this before? For they too did not agree with the verdict of the overseas bishops, who judged in our favour; for they are joined to us today. If Christ the judge says this, what have you to answer?
Chapter 130
130CSEL 51:8lines 130–142–9
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Lumen cordis si est in uobis, uerum potestis uidere. sunt preces Donati et acta, quibus quod dictum est probate. quae si credere non uultis, uos huc aliqua proferte. quibus si et nos non credimus, erit rixa sine fine. amplectamur ergo pacem. quid ad nos quod gestum est ante? obicitis traditionem: respondemus uos fecisse. clamatis uos de Macario: et nos de circumcellione. illud nostrum iam transactum: uestri non cessant usque hodie. habet paleas area nostra: uos hoc solum uultis esse; uos enim non uultis pacem. illi minantur de fuste: et utinam minarentur et non tunderent cotidie. hos si expellunt isti uestri, non habent per quos regnare.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. If the light of the heart is in you, you can see the truth. There are the petitions of Donatus and the proceedings: by them prove what has been said. If you do not wish to believe these, produce something here yourselves. If we too do not believe those, there will be a quarrel without end. Let us therefore embrace peace. What is it to us what was done before? You charge the handing over: we answer that you did it. You cry out about Macarius: and we about the circumcellion. That of ours is already past: yours do not stop even today. Our threshing floor has chaff: you want it to be this alone; for you do not want peace. Those men threaten with the club: and would that they only threatened and did not beat every day. If these of yours drive them out, they have no one through whom to reign.
Chapter 143
143CSEL 51:9lines 143–155
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Modum si excessit Macarius conscriptum in christiana lege, uel legem regis referebat, ut pugnaret pro unitate. non dico istum nil peccasse, sed uestros peiores esse. quis enim praecepit illis per Africam sic saeuire? non Christus, non imperator haec probatur permisisse, fustes et ignes priuatos et insaniam sine lege. quia scriptum est: reconde gladium, scelus non putant in fuste, non ut homo moriatur, sed ut conquassetur ualde et postea moriatur inde, iam cruciatus languore. sed tamen si miserentur, occidunt et uno fuste. fustes Israheles uocant, quod dixerunt cum honore, ut plus uastent ipsum nomen quam corpus quod caedunt inde.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. If Macarius exceeded the measure written in the Christian law, at least he was carrying out the law of the king, so as to fight for unity. I do not say that he sinned in nothing, but that yours are worse. For who commanded them to rage like this throughout Africa? Not Christ, not the emperor, is shown to have permitted these things, private clubs and fires and madness without law. Because it is written, ‘Put back your sword’, they do not think it a crime with a club, not so that a man dies, but so that he is badly battered and afterwards dies of it, already tortured by weakness. But yet if they take pity, they kill even with one blow of the club. They call the clubs ‘Israels’, which they said as an honour, so that they lay waste the name itself more than the body they beat with them.
Chapter 156
156CSEL 51:9lines 156–168–10
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Nolite nobis iam, fratres, tempus Macarii imputare. si crudeles erant illi, et nobis displicent ualde; si autem falsa de illis dicunt, deus potest iudicare. nos amemus pacem Christi, gaudeamus in unitate. si qui sunt mali in ecclesia, nil nobis possunt nocere. si non possunt nobiscum esse, excludantur salua pace. si non poterunt excludi, excludantur uel de corde. dixit Ezechiel sanctus quosdam consignatos esse, qui gemunt peccata fratrum et non se separant inde. sic nos propter malos fratres non separemur a matre, quod tunc impii fecerunt extra leuantes altare, ut peiores nunc haberent quam quos se fingunt fugisse.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Do not, brothers, charge us any more with the time of Macarius. If those men were cruel, they greatly displease us too; but if they tell lies about them, God can judge. Let us love the peace of Christ, let us rejoice in unity. If there are bad men in the church, they can do us no harm. If they cannot be with us, let them be excluded, peace being kept. If they cannot be excluded, let them be excluded at least from the heart. Holy Ezekiel said that certain men were sealed, who groan over the sins of their brothers and do not separate themselves from them. So let us not be separated from our mother on account of bad brothers, as impious men did then, raising an altar outside, so that they now have worse men than those they pretend to have fled.
Chapter 169
169CSEL 51:10lines 169–181
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Omnis qui scripturas legit nouit quod uolo aperire. Iohannes Baptista dixit tunc ad Iudaeos aperte, quod illos tamquam aream suam posset Christus uentilare. misit in messem operarios discipulos praedicare, per quos area collecta est et uentilata de cruce. tunc iusti tamquam frumentum ecclesias implerunt caste uendentes quae possidebant et mundo dicentes uale. illi tamquam semen erant, quod toto dispersum est orbe, ut alia surgeret messis, quae uentilanda est in fine. haec crescit inter zizania, quia sunt haereses ubique; huius palea sunt iniusti, qui non sunt in unitate. ex quibus si erat Macarius, nos quid uis rebaptizare?
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Everyone who reads the Scriptures knows what I wish to open up. John the Baptist said then plainly to the Jews that Christ could winnow them as his threshing floor. He sent workers into the harvest, the disciples, to preach; through them the threshing floor was gathered and winnowed by the cross. Then the righteous, like the wheat, filled the churches chastely, selling what they possessed and saying farewell to the world. They were like seed, which has been scattered through the whole world, so that another harvest might rise, which is to be winnowed at the end. This grows among the weeds, because there are heresies everywhere; its chaff are the unrighteous, who are not in unity. If Macarius was one of these, why do you want to rebaptize us?
Chapter 182
182CSEL 51:10lines 182–194–11
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Pone in corde areas duas, ut possis quod dico uidere. certe et priores habebant sanctos, sicut ostendunt scripturae. nam et septem milia uirorum deus se dixit reliquisse, et sacerdotes et reges multi iusti sunt in lege. ibi habes tantos prophetas, habes multos et de plebe. dic mihi quis tunc iustorum separauit sibi altare. multa scelera admittebat iniquus populus ille, idolis sacrificatum est, tot occisi sunt prophetae et nemo tamen iustorum recessit ab unitate. iusti iniustos sufferebant uenturo uentilatore, uno templo miscebantur, sed mixti non erant corde, dicebant in illos tanta et unum habebant altare.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Picture two threshing floors in your heart, so that you can see what I say. Certainly the former people too had saints, as the Scriptures show. For God said that he had left seven thousand men, and in the law many priests and kings are righteous. There you have so many prophets, you have many also from the common people. Tell me which of the righteous then set up an altar apart for himself. That unrighteous people committed many crimes: sacrifice was made to idols, so many prophets were killed, and yet none of the righteous withdrew from unity. The righteous bore with the unrighteous until the winnower should come; they were mingled in one temple, but they were not mingled in heart; they said such things against them and had one altar.
Chapter 195
195CSEL 51:11lines 195–205
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Quid uobis ad haec uidetur? secunda messis ecclesiae, quae per totum orbem crescit, plura debet sustinere: habet [et]iam domini exemplum et in Iuda traditore. hunc inter bonos ferebat, hunc misit et praedicare. malus seruus praedicabat, sed Christus erat in fide, quia qui iudici credebant non curabant de praecone. quando dedit sanctam cenam, nec tunc illum exclusit inde, et posset per illum tradi, etiam si inde exisset ante. sed nobis exemplum datum est malos fratres tolerare, ut, cum non possunt excludi, solo separemur corde.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. What do you think of this? The second harvest, that of the church, which grows through the whole world, must bear more: it has already the Lord’s example in Judas the traitor. Him he bore among the good, him he also sent to preach. A bad servant was preaching, but Christ was in the faith, because those who believed the judge did not care about the herald. When he gave the holy supper, not even then did he exclude him from it, and he could have been betrayed through him even if Judas had gone out from there before. But to us an example was given to tolerate bad brothers, so that, when they cannot be excluded, we are separated only by the heart.
Chapter 206
206CSEL 51:11lines 206–218–12
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Rogo, respondete nobis, quid uultis rebaptizare. lapsos sacerdotes uestros pellitis a communione et nemo tamen post illos ausus est rebaptizare et quoscumque baptizarunt uobis communicant hodie. quid ab eis acceperunt, si non habebant quid dare? legite quomodo adulteri puniantur in sancta lege; non enim dicere possunt, quia peccarunt a timore. si sancti soli baptizant, post istos rebaptizate. quid calumniamini nobis, quia sumus in unitate, qui nondum eramus nati in illa persecutione? scriptum est peccata patrum ad filios non pertinere, sed nemo dat fructum bonum, si praecisus est de uite.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. I ask you, answer us: why do you want to rebaptize? You drive your fallen bishops from communion, and yet no one after them has dared to rebaptize, and all whom they baptized are in communion with you today. What did they receive from them, if those had nothing to give? Read how adulterers are punished in the holy law; for they cannot say that they sinned from fear. If only the holy baptize, rebaptize after these men. Why do you slander us because we are in unity, we who were not yet born in that persecution? It is written that the sins of the fathers do not pertain to the sons, but no one bears good fruit if he is cut off from the vine.
Chapter 219
219CSEL 51:12lines 219–231
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Scitis catholica quid sit et quid sit praecisum a uite. si qui sunt inter uos cauti, ueniant, uiuant in radice; antequam nimis arescant, iam liberentur ab igne. ideo non rebaptizamus, quod unum signum est in fide, non quia uos sanctos uidemus, sed solam formam tenere, quia ipsam formam habet sarmentum, quod praecisum est de uite. sed quid illi prodest forma, si non uiuit de radice? uenite, fratres, si uultis, ut inseramini in uite. dolor est cum uos uidemus praecisos ita iacere. numerate sacerdotes uel ab ipsa Petri sede et in ordine illo patrum quis cui successit uidete: ipsa est petra quam non uincunt superbae inferorum portae.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. You know what the Catholic is, and what is cut off from the vine. If there are any prudent among you, let them come, let them live in the root; before they dry up too much, let them now be freed from the fire. We do not rebaptize for this reason, that there is one sign in the faith, not because we see that you are holy, but that you hold only the form; for the branch that is cut off from the vine has the very form. But what does the form profit it, if it does not live from the root? Come, brothers, if you are willing, that you may be grafted into the vine. It is a grief when we see you lying so, cut off. Count the bishops even from the very see of Peter, and in that order of fathers see who succeeded whom: that is the rock which the proud gates of the underworld do not conquer.
Chapter 232
232CSEL 51:12lines 232–244–13
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Talis si quis ad te ueniat plenus catholica fide, quales illos sanctos uiros omnes solemus audire, et si tibi dicat: 'frater, quid me uis rebaptizare? quid sit ante factum nescio, nunc autem sum in Christi fide. si me maculat quod nescio, tu qualis sis nunc ostende: uultus tuos ecce attendo, ignoro quid sit in corde. si me maculat quod nescio, tu me maculas fortasse, et si te credo esse sanctum, quibus communicas uide. si maculat quod nescimus, iam non potes sanctus esse, quem maculant tot peccata, quae committunt uestri occulte. si autem quod nescis non curas, nec ego quod factum est ante'. et tamen christianum talem audes ⟨tu⟩ rebaptizare.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. If someone comes to you like this, full of the Catholic faith, such as we are accustomed to hear all those holy men were, and says to you: ‘Brother, why do you want to rebaptize me? What was done before I do not know; but now I am in the faith of Christ. If what I do not know stains me, show what sort of man you are now: see, I look at your face; I do not know what is in your heart. If what I do not know stains me, perhaps you stain me, and if I believe you are holy, see with whom you communicate. If what we do not know stains, you can no longer be holy, you whom so many sins stain, which your people commit in secret. But if you do not care about what you do not know, neither do I about what was done before.’ And yet you dare to rebaptize such a Christian.
Chapter 245
245CSEL 51:13lines 245–257
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Uae qui pro cathedris uestris sic contenditis iniuste. clamatis uos solos sanctos, aliud dicitis in corde, quia uidetis et uos multos malos abundare ubique. numquid dicere potestis: 'mixti sumus intra rete'? respondetur enim uobis iam uos illud disrupisse. neque dicere potestis paleas uos sustinere; iterum enim respondemus: hoc fecissetis et ante. non enim peiores erant illo Iuda traditore, cum quo apostoli acceperunt primum sacramentum cenae, cum tanti sceleris reum inter se iam scirent esse; nec tamen hos inquinabant sordes in alieno corde. et tamen christianos fratres audetis rebaptizare.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Woe to you who strive so unjustly for your bishops’ chairs. You cry out that you alone are holy; you say something else in your heart, because you see that among you too many bad men abound everywhere. Can you say, ‘We are mixed within the net’? For the answer to you is that you have already broken it. Nor can you say that you bear with the chaff; for again we answer: you should have done this before as well. For those men were not worse than Judas the traitor, with whom the apostles received the first sacrament of the supper, when they already knew that one guilty of so great a crime was among them; and yet the filth in another’s heart did not defile them. And yet you dare to rebaptize Christian brothers.
Chapter 258
258CSEL 51:14lines 258–288–15
Omnes qui gaudetis de pace, modo uerum iudicate. Audite, fratres, quod dico, et mihi irasci nolite. quia non sunt falsa quae auditis, potestis et considerare. quid si ipsa mater ecclesia uos alloquatur cum pace et dicat: 'o filii mei, quid querimini de matre? quare me deseruistis, iam uolo a uobis audire. accusatis fratres uestros et ego laceror ualde. quando me premebant gentes, multa tuli cum dolore. multi me deseruerunt, sed fecerunt in timore; uos uero nullus coegit sic contra me rebellare. dicitis mecum uos esse, sed falsum uidetis esse: ego catholica dicor et uos de Donati parte. iussit me apostolus pro regibus mundi orare; uos inuidetis, quod reges iam sunt in christiana fide. si filii estis, quid inuidetis, quia auditae sunt preces meae? quando enim dona miserunt, noluistis acceptare et obliti estis prophetas, qui illud praedixerunt ante, quod gentium reges magni missuri essent dona ecclesiae. quae dona cum respuistis, ostendistis uos non esse et Macarium coegistis suum dolorem uindicare. sed ego quid uobis feci, uestra mater in toto orbe? expello malos quos possum, quos non possum cogor ferre; fero illos, donec sanentur aut separentur in fine. uos me quare dimisistis et crucior de uestra morte? si multum malos odistis, quales habetis uidete. si et uos toleratis malos, quare non in unitate, ubi nemo rebaptizat nec altare est contra altare? malos tantos toleratis, sed nulla bona mercede, quia, quod debetis pro Christo, pro Donato uultis ferre'. cantauimus uobis, fratres, pacem, si uultis audire. uenturus est iudex noster: nos damus, exigit ille.
All you who rejoice in peace, now judge what is true. Listen, brothers, to what I say, and do not be angry with me. Because what you hear is not false, you can also consider it. What if mother church herself should address you in peace and say: ‘O my sons, why do you complain of your mother? Why have you deserted me? I want to hear it from you now. You accuse your brothers, and I am greatly torn. When the nations pressed me hard, I bore much with grief. Many deserted me, but they did it in fear; but no one forced you to rebel against me like this. You say you are with me, but you see that it is false. I am called Catholic, and you are of the party of Donatus. The apostle commanded me to pray for the kings of the world; you are envious that the kings are now in the Christian faith. If you are sons, why are you envious that my prayers have been heard? For when they sent gifts, you refused to accept them, and you forgot the prophets, who foretold long before that great kings of the nations would send gifts to the church. When you spurned those gifts, you showed that you are not my sons, and you forced Macarius to avenge his grief. But what have I done to you, I, your mother throughout the whole world? I expel the bad whom I can; those I cannot I am compelled to bear; I bear them until they are healed or are separated at the end. Why have you abandoned me, so that I am tormented by your death? If you hate the bad so much, see what sort you have. If you too tolerate the bad, why not in unity, where no one rebaptizes and there is no altar against altar? You tolerate such bad men, but for no good reward, because what you ought to bear for Christ, you choose to bear for Donatus.’ We have sung peace to you, brothers, if you are willing to hear. Our judge is coming: we give, he will exact.